Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608067C070209
Original file (9608067C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that his Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) election be changed from “child only” to “spouse and child”.

APPLICANT STATES:  In effect, that in 1970, he completed RSFPP election form; that he did not list his wife as the beneficiary instead he elected “child only” coverage and that he did not discover the mistake until April 1995.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant’s military records show:

The applicant was a member of the Army Reserve.  The applicant was married with children.  On 7 October 1966, the applicant elected to participate in the RSFPP for “children only”.  On 1 September 1970, the applicant retired.  On 
18 September 1970, the applicant again indicated that his three beneficiaries were his children.

The applicant claims that he did not discover that his spouse was not covered under the RSFPP until sometime in April 1995.

On 27 December 1995, the applicant filed an appeal to this Board for correction of his military records.

Beginning October 1972, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service mailed each retiree elections forms and a letter of instruction.  The Army Echoes, issued bi-monthly thereafter, continued with special items on the RSFPP and SBP.  In July 1973 and, again, in November 1973, the Retired Pay Division sent each retiree, who had not elected to participate in the Plan, a card with notice of the deadline for election and instructions on how forms could be obtained for submission.

Open Enrollment Periods allowed retirees who had not previously elected to participate in the SBP an opportunity to do so.  Literature and election certificates were provided to all retirees who had not previously elected SBP participation.  The amount of information on survivor plans intensified during each of the three Open Enrollment Periods, 1972, 1981, and 1992. 

In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the SBP Board which recommended that the applicant’s request be denied.  

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence which would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.  
2.  The applicant alleges that he was not aware that his spouse was not listed as his beneficiary until April 1995. The available evidence of record shows that in 1966 and 1970, the applicant elected RSFPP for “children only” coverage, excluding his spouse from RSFPP coverage.  The available records also show that the applicant had numerous opportunities to correct this error even if he says he was not aware of the error.  The applicant received numerous articles in the Army Echoes on both RSFPP and SBP over the years.  The amount of information on survivor plans intensified during each of the three Open Enrollment Periods, 1972, 1981 and 1992, and it is reasonable to expect that during those time periods or as a result of any Echoes articles, the applicant would examine his participation.  Further, in 1984, RSFPP child costs were suspended for the applicant when his youngest child lost eligibility after graduating from college.  The applicant’s RSFPP participation which excluded his spouse would have definitely come to his attention and that would have been in the 1983-84 time-frame. 

3.  There is no apparent government administrative error in this case, nor has an injustice been served since the RSFPP protection paid for was appropriately received by his eligible children.

4.  The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor convincing argument in support of his request.

4.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, there exists no basis for granting the applicant’s request.  

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013961

    Original file (20070013961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. At this time but before 1 September 1969, a retired member who was participating in the RSFPP without inclusion of the former option 4 could have elected to have that option included in his election. The FSM retired in November 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009927

    Original file (20080009927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 2656-5 dated 25 August 2005 shows that the applicant selected Option C (Immediate Annuity) to provide an immediate annuity to his spouse and dependent children based on his full retirement pay beginning on the day after the date of his death, whether before or after age 60. Based on the foregoing evidence, it is now appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show that he changed his SBP election to immediate annuity coverage for spouse only based on full gross pay without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00568

    Original file (BC-2006-00568.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior to the servicemember’s 1 October 1963 retirement, he was married and elected spouse and child RSFPP coverage, Option 4 - that allowed the member to terminate RSFPP premium payments in the event the beneficiary lost eligibility. We find no evidence he attempted to elect SBP coverage for the applicant during any of the four open enrollment periods provide by law. Regardless, it appears the servicemember made no attempt to elect SBP coverage for the applicant when he was eligible during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792

    Original file (20070013792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons. Even if the FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007740

    Original file (20140007740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 5 January 2012, which shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He also provided a retiree account statement, effective 7 March 2012, which shows he had spouse-only SBP coverage. He provided a retiree account statement, effective 21 March 2014, which shows he had children-only SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009413

    Original file (20100009413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected by changing his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election from children only to spouse coverage. The applicant married in September 2000 and he had one year from his date of marriage to enroll in the RCSBP for spouse coverage. Since there is no evidence which shows the applicant attempted to enroll in the SBP within one year of his marriage, regrettably, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02399

    Original file (BC-2004-02399.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force he elected child coverage under the SBP. If his daughter’s disability was diagnosed while she was otherwise eligible, the member could have elected coverage on her behalf during the initial open enrollment; however, there is no evidence such an election was submitted. We believe the applicant would have elected to provide coverage for his daughter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003898

    Original file (20090003898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a DD Form 2656-3, dated 23 November 1999, which shows an election of spouse and child beneficiary category based on the full amount of retired pay with immediate coverage. Each statement showed the current SBP coverage elected by the retiree or the fact that no SBP election is reflected. As such, the election for spouse and child only made at the time of his retired pay application would not have been valid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003452

    Original file (20090003452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003452 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that a military retiree can have a portion of his or her monthly retired pay withheld in order to provide, after his or her death, a monthly survivor benefit to a surviving spouse, child(ren), or other eligible recipient(s). On remarriage a retiree may elect SBP spouse coverage for the first spouse acquired...