APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for upgrade of his discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: He restates his original contentions, verbatim (COPY ATTACHED).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which are summarized in a memorandum presented before this Board on 8 January 1997 (COPY ATTACHED).
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2. The applicant has submitted an identical copy of his original request, without change, for the Boards consideration.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis upon which to grant the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The original decision by this Board is reaffirmed.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506883C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for upgrade of his undesirable discharge, which was denied by this Board on 1 November 1995. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which are summarized in a memorandum presented before this Board on 1 November 1995. The applicant has not furnished any documentary evidence which would support a determination that he had PTSD, nor do his records so indicate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065403C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS : Reconsideration of his earlier application to correct his military records by showing that he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge based on his service during Operation Desert Storm. The original consideration by the ABCMR denied the request for award of the Combat Medical Badge solely because there was no evidence that the applicant was personally...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9308593
He is also receiving blood work for hepatitis. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00036
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial noting the applicant has not exhausted her administrative remedies. A review of the applicants request determined her first avenue of relief is through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05179 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507475C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for upgrading of his separation to honorable, which was denied by this Board on 19 July 1995. APPLICANT STATES: That he was punished, but not one attempt to treat him for his problems. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608580C070209
On 3 April 1997, a member of the staff of the Board spoke with the applicant and requested copies of the sworn affidavits supporting her allegation. In lieu of the requested affidavits, she furnished a newspaper article, dated 5 days after her request was received at the Board and a copy of her prior denial of release from active duty. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608317C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for promotion to Major. The statute under which the Board was established provides that an application must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. However, The Board has never denied an application simply because it was not submitted within the required time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511095C070209
COUNSEL CONTENDS: That the previous decision indicated a review of morning reports for a period for which the applicant was not in service. Further, it is requested that all morning reports for the applicants entire period of service be reviewed. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 04176 2
In the original case, the applicant contended he served on temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam and Okinawa, Japan, and submitted a sworn statement from an alleged eyewitness who served with him in Vietnam in support of his request. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit F. On 20 Feb 14, AFPC/DPAPP directed the applicants DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect 4 months and 13 days of foreign-service credit for his service in Germany during the period 3 Oct 63 through 15 Feb 64. The...