Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607136C070209
Original file (9607136C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, the applicant requests she receive benefits based on her deceased husband’s (a former serviceman) retirement from the Army.  

APPLICANT STATES:  She states that her husband never received monthly retirement benefits, that he served his country for 23 years with honor, and that he loved his country.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The former serviceman’s (FSM) military records show:

He enlisted in the Army on 28 July 1960 and was released from active duty on 27 July 1963.  He reenlisted for three years on 23 August 1967 and remained on active duty until his discharge in 1983.

On 8 May 1979 he was notified that a Army selection board determined that he was to be barred from reenlistment under the Army’s Qualitative Management Program (QMP).  On 
8 August 1979 the FSM notified the Army Military Personnel Center that he would execute a statement that he would not submit a request for reconsideration, that he would complete his remaining term of enlistment and would take no further action. 

The FSM was discharged on 14 March 1983 upon expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had 18 years, 6 months, and 
8 days of active service, and 14 days of lost time.

A 3 May 1996 advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) concerning the service of the FSM indicates that he had 18 years, 7 months, and 8 days of active Federal service, and because he did not complete 20 years of active Federal service he was ineligible for retired pay benefits.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets the policies, standards, and procedures concerning the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 12-4 of that regulation concerns the twenty-year retirement law (10 USC 3914), and states in part, that a soldier who has completed 20, but less than 30 years of active Federal service in the US Armed Forces may, at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army, be retired at his request.  The soldier must have completed all required service obligations at the time of retirement.

Army Regulation 600-200, chapter 4, then in effect, sets forth policy and prescribes procedures for denying reenlistment under the QMP.  This program is based on the premise that reenlistment is a privilege for those whose performance, conduct, attitude, and potential for advancement meet Army standards. It is designed to (1) enhance the quality of the career enlisted force, (2) selectively retain the best qualified soldiers to 30 years of active duty, (3) deny reenlistment to nonprogressive and nonproductive soldiers, and (4) encourage soldiers to maintain their eligibility for further service.  Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.  A soldier who has completed 18 years or more of service on the effective date of the DA bar to reenlistment memorandum may be extended to reach retirement eligibility.     
  
DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  The FSM did not complete 20 years of active Federal service, was not eligible for retirement nor entitled to any retirement benefits. 

2.  The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of her request.   

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.


DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021535

    Original file (20100021535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a memorandum to the FSM from the Military Department of Arkansas, Office of The Adjutant General, subject: Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, dated 21 March 1988 * the FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * a self-authored letter to AR-PERSCOM, dated 27 September 2002, with the following attachments: * the FSM's State of Arkansas Certificate of Death which shows the informant's name as "B---y M--------n" [the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090179C070212

    Original file (2003090179C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM's military records show: The FSM’s wife is not entitled to any retirement benefits, as the service member was not retired at the time of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605630C070209

    Original file (9605630C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that although his selection under the Army’s Qualitative Management Program and subsequent separation “weighed heavily on” him he had not “yet reached [his] “bottom” and continued to drink after his separation. The applicant states that his “discharge was a direct result of the Army’s failure to properly diagnose and treat [his] disease of alcoholism” and he is “now requesting that [he] be given something for the over 16 years of active service [he] gave [his] country.” EVIDENCE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013081

    Original file (20110013081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 October 1974 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 October 1976 * memorandum, U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (USAEREC), dated 15 January 1992, subject: Department of the Army (DA) Imposed Bar to Reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP), and allied documents * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008249

    Original file (20090008249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the ex-spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that the FSM's records be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage and that she be paid the SBP benefit payments. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708117C070209

    Original file (9708117C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that the FY94 early retirement program allowed soldiers with over 18 years of active Federal service to apply for early retirement regardless of specialty or grade if they were facing involuntary separation as a result of the QMP. On 31 December 1993 the applicant was separated from active duty in pay grade E-6 and received $19,534.18 in separation pay. Individuals identified for involuntary separation under the QMP, with less than 18 years of active Federal service, were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007646

    Original file (20120007646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021472

    Original file (20100021472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows she enlisted in the RA on 12 August 1971. She was honorably discharged from active service on 6 December 1988 in pay grade E-5. There is no evidence of record and she did not provide any evidence to show that she was not provided the opportunity to be reassigned to overcome the indicated areas of deficiency or that she was improperly barred from reenlistment and thus was unable to complete 20 years of active Federal service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006973

    Original file (20090006973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. This letter also notified the FSM that he was entitled to participate in the RCSBP and that "By law, he had only 90 calendar days from the date he received this letter to submit his Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate (DA Form 1883). The FSM's records do not indicate that he elected to participate in the RCSBP and the applicant has not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024370

    Original file (20100024370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). After receiving legal counsel, the FSM voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The FSM's record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement and does not support the issue of an honorable or general discharge by the separation...