Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508744C070209
Original file (9508744C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his administrative medical discharge from the ARNG be corrected to a medical retirement.

APPLICANT STATES:  He was not given a medical examination or compensation for his disability.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 11 October 1991 with no prior service, was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-3.

While assigned to an ARNG unit, the applicant submitted a civilian physician’s statement, dated 26 February 1993, stating that he had a recurrent dislocation of his left shoulder and was scheduled for surgical repair of that shoulder within a few weeks.

On 17 March 1993 the applicant submitted a letter to his commander requesting that he be discharged due to his shoulder problems, stating that he would not be able to perform his military duties.

The applicant’s medical records were then reviewed by the Virginia ARNG State Surgeon who determined his recurrent shoulder dislocation was disqualifying for retention.

Accordingly, on 1 July 1993 the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG and as a reserve of the Army due to medical disqualification.

Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while performing active or inactive (weekend drill) duty.

Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel in the ARNG and USAR.  Paragraph 12-1 prescribes the procedures for separating members for medical disqualification.  This paragraph requires a member who is determined to be medically disqualified for retention to be discharged or transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired) (regardless of years of service), unless the member requests, and is granted, a waiver.

The authority of the Board is applicable to the National Guard only in certain limited situations, such as when the Guard has been Federalized or when the subject matter of an application affects a person’s status as a Reserve of the Army while a member of the National Guard of the United States.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  The Board does not have the authority to change the type of separation the applicant received from the ARNG.  However, the Board does have the authority to change his discharge from the USAR (when he was discharged as both a reservist and a guardsman) to a medical retirement.

2.  However, there is no evidence that the applicant’s shoulder dislocation was service related.

3.  As such, he was not entitled to be considered for medical retirement and was properly administratively discharged due to medical disqualification.

4.  In addition, it is noted that the applicant himself requested that he be administratively discharged.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016072

    Original file (20090016072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The Army Reserve Personnel Command Form 249-E in the applicant's record confirms he completed a total of 16 years and 10 months of qualifying service for retirement between 29 June 1972 and 27 January 1998. Absent any evidence of record confirming the service-connected medical conditions for which he received a disability rating from the VA or any other medical conditions rendered him unfit to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510471C070209

    Original file (9510471C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB) for a determination of whether they are able to perform the duties of their grade and military specialty with the medically disqualifying condition. Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while performing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016390

    Original file (20110016390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board stated in the "Discussion and Conclusion" portion of the Record of Proceedings that the evidence of record shows he [the applicant] underwent a Medical Duty Review Board in February 2001 and he was found fully fit and deployable at the time." The applicant provides: * Memorandum, dated 8 march 2003, Subject: MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) Medical Retention Board (MMRB) Approval * Various civilian and/or service medical records throughout his military service CONSIDERATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019324

    Original file (20090019324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. Although the applicant contends he should have gone through medical processing since his injury occurred on active duty, the available evidence shows his medical condition did not render him medically unfit or unable to meet retention...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607088C070209

    Original file (9607088C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40, the regulation which governs PEB’s, paragraph 4-19b, states that a PEB may decide that a soldier’s physical defect was EPTS, but must then determine whether the condition was aggravated by military service. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, Retirement or Separation for Physical Disability, provides for the medical retirement and for the discharge for physical unfitness, with severance pay, of soldiers who incur a physical disability in the line of duty while serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510220C070209

    Original file (9510220C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    After he stopped attending drills, he was discharged for medical disqualification upon the advice of the ARNG State Surgeon even though he had been found physically fit to perform his duties by a physical evaluation board (PEB). This paragraph requires a member who is determined to be medically disqualified for retention to be discharged or transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired) (regardless of years of service), unless the member requests, and is granted, a waiver of the medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506854C070209

    Original file (9506854C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the ARNG with no prior service on 14 January 1974, entered on his initial active duty for training on 4 June 1974, was awarded the military occupational specialty of supply specialist, and was honorably released from active duty and returned to his ARNG unit on 5 December 1974. The PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged with severance pay, rated 10 percent disabled, contingent on the applicant’s unfitting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606812C070209

    Original file (9606812C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The formal PEB concluded that the applicant’s left shoulder condition “prevents reasonable performance of duties required by grade and military specialty” and rated his condition at 20 percent under VASRD Code 5201. They noted that the applicant’s shoulder condition was properly rated and that “although the applicant established that he probably had a herniated disc at L5-S1 before separation that fact was considered and did not change any PEB findings or recommendations.” The PDA concluded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002434

    Original file (20130002434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was medically retired. The medical records provided by the applicant do not include any service medical records. The applicant's service medical records are not available for review and his civilian medical records show he declined intervention procedures for his ulcers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004562

    Original file (20070004562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show he transferred to the Retired Reserve, effective 15 June 2005. The evidence of record shows that the applicant elected to be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army with 19 years of creditable service for retired pay. Thus, the evidence of record shows that the applicant completed 20 creditable years of service prior to the date he was discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army.