APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable, that the reason for his discharge be changed to for the convenience of the government and his reentry (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1. He contends that the punishment that he received was too severe when compared to todays standards and that he has been a good citizen and free of drug charges since his release from the Army.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army for 2 years on 11 January 1972. He received a BCD on 23 October 1974 as the result of a conviction by a general court-martial. During his service he accumulated 257 days of lost time.
On 4 January 1974 he pleaded guilty before a general court-martial to four specifications of violation of Article 92, UCMJ, unlawful possession and sale of controlled substances (drugs). He was found guilty of the charge and specifications and in accordance with a pretrial agreement with the convening authority, was sentenced to a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 9 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to pay grade E-1.
His sentence to confinement was remitted to 8 months by the Clemency and Parole Board. Thereafter, the findings and sentence of the his court-martial was affirmed by the Court of Military Review. At the conclusion of his period of confinement, he was separated from the service with a BCD pursuant to authority contained in Army Regulation 635-200. The reason for his discharge was conviction by a court-martial. He was assigned an RE-4 code.
Army Regulation 635-200, Personnel Separation, provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The reason and authority for the separation will be determined by the type separation. Separation by reason of a general court-martial is a nonwaivable disqualification for future entry into the service.
Army Regulation 601-210, Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program, provides that persons separated from the last period of service with a nonwaiverable disqualification will be assigned code RE-4.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 23 October 1974, the date of discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 23 October 1977.
The application is dated 3 November 1995 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
BOARD VOTE:
EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022000
His record contains a DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 1 March 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 3, as a result of court-martial with a BCD. It states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The DA Form 4833 was completed prior to the applicants...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055013C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The time for the applicant to file a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009736
The applicant's case was reviewed by three appellate military judges of the U.S. Army Court of Military Review (CMR) on 30 December 1975. The applicant submitted an application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) requesting upgrade of his discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605695C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable or general. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029837
On 20 May 1994, applicant was accordingly discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, section IV, by reason of court-martial, other, with a bad conduct discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant's request for change of his RE code has been carefully...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015743
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of one specification of manslaughter. He has not provided sufficient evidence or argument to show his discharge should be upgraded to an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2007-144
CGPC stated that even if the Board waives the statute of limitations, relief should be denied because a “complete review of the applicant’s record does not reveal an error or injustice with regards to his processing for separation.” CGPC stated that the applicant’s bad conduct discharge was part of his sentence upon conviction of several serious offenses and that the Commandant denied clemency upon review and ordered that the BCD be executed. Given that the BCD was part of the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017771
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003470C070206
On 12 April 1995, the applicant was discharged from the Army pursuant to the sentence of the special court-martial and was issued a BCD. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003782
It is not available in the applicant's service record). The applicant was discharged accordingly. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.