Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605145C070209
Original file (9605145C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he declined to participate in the SBP (Survivor Benefit Plan) upon remarriage to his current spouse.  

3.  The applicant’s military records show that he retired from active duty on 30 June 1962 with the rank of chief warrant officer four with more than 21 years of creditable active service.  

4.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Military members who were retired before 21 September 1972 had until 20 September 1974 to apply for coverage under the SBP.  The applicant elected SBP participation for his spouse on 1 December 1972. He notified the DFAS that his spouse died in February 1990. The Retired Annuitant Pay Statement issued to him at that time states that due to the death of his spouse the SBP cost was suspended, and that he should notified DFAS if he remarried.  

5.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised that the applicant failed to notify the DFAS of his remarriage before the first anniversary of the marriage.  Had he done so, he would have been advised that he had the option to terminate the SBP coverage which had been suspended due to the loss of his spouse.  The DFAS offered no objections to granting the applicant’s request.  

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant had elected SBP participation for his first spouse.  When his spouse died, the SBP coverage was suspended, and he was informed that he should notify the DFAS if he remarried.  

2.  It appears that the applicant neglected to notify the DFAS of his remarriage within the first year, and this resulted in unwanted SBP coverage.  

3.  Although he did not exercise his option to terminate SBP coverage at the time of his remarriage, it would still be appropriate to correct the records as recommended by the DFAS.  

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned terminated spousal SBP coverage subsequent to his remarriage on 6 November 1993 and to reimburse him for premiums collected since that date if applicable.  

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005870C070208

    Original file (20040005870C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. When a member elects spouse coverage, that election is normally irrevocable. His spouse SBP coverage had been suspended for 6 years when he remarried in February 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004968

    Original file (20130004968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    was deceased as of 3 June 2006 * it appears he failed to notify DFAS (however, DFAS indicated they had been notified) * he has since remarried and would like to continue his benefit plan for his current spouse * DFAS continued to collect payments all this time (however, DFAS indicated they had not been collecting spouse premiums but had been erroneously collecting child premiums) d. a DD Form 2656, undated by the applicant, which shows; * he indicated his current coverage was spouse and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014175

    Original file (20130014175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law, once made, is irrevocable. When he and Maureen were divorced, the coverage did not change but the spouse premiums were suspended. The applicant does not now have the option to terminate his SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013040

    Original file (20100013040.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse coverage. The applicant states: * He nor his wife wishes to be covered by the SBP * he assumed after being retired for 43 years and having lost his first wife the SBP no longer applied * he is a retired lieutenant colonel (LTC) who retired in October 1967 and elected to participate in the SBP with spouse coverage * his first wife died in 2001, he was 81 years old at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019000

    Original file (20070019000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070019000 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 12 January 1987, the applicant completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) and elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he requested termination of his SBP coverage on 1 January 2005; that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028852

    Original file (20100028852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he elected to discontinue participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and dismissal of the $10,502.66 debt established by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) for SBP premiums he did not pay when he remarried after he retired from military service. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he elected to discontinue participation in the SBP or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013118

    Original file (20140013118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated 1 February 1981, shows he was married to Anne and elected Option C (Immediate Coverage) Spouse Only at the Full Retired Pay Rate. State of Arkansas Marriage License showing he married Cherry on 30 March 2006; and b. DD Form 2656-6, dated 9 July 2014, showing: (1) An "X" was placed in item 8 (Remarriage) and an "X" in item (4) of item 8 indicating he was selecting coverage for his new spouse if his current coverage is former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074802C070403

    Original file (2002074802C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SBP provides a survivor 55 percent of a participant’s military retired pay. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the SBP in March 1990. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested on 1 August 1997 not to resume his spouse SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013841

    Original file (20110013841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was informed he could elect to enroll his current spouse in the SBP by filing out the appropriate forms. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1995, permitted a previously participating retiree upon remarriage to elect not to resume spouse coverage or to increase reduced coverage for the latter spouse (requiring a payback with interest of SBP premiums prior to the first anniversary of the remarriage). This statement shows whether or not SBP premiums are being deducted from a retiree's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008892

    Original file (20140008892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 August 2013, they received his application for the annuity and at that time they discovered that he and the FSM had remarried on 5 September 2002. c. If a member who had elected former spouse coverage subsequently married, subject to certain limitations, she/he could change the former spouse election to provide an annuity on the new spouse in accordance with Title 10, USC, section 1450(f). Notwithstanding the fact that neither the FSM nor the applicant notified DFAS at any time after...