Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070019000
Original file (20070019000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070019000 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) be cancelled.

2.  The applicant states that after he remarried in 2004 he thought the SBP would be a benefit for his wife, so he sent their marriage certificate to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).  However, they were devastated when DFAS informed them they owed a debt of $2,312.56 plus monthly premiums of $100.87.  They have to budget every dollar, every month, to eradicate their debts and cannot afford to incur additional debt.

3.  The applicant provides his marriage license; five letters from DFAS, one dated 3 December 2007, two dated 14 January 2008, one dated 25 February 2008, and one dated 26 February 2008; seven Retiree Account Statements; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 January 1987; an uncompleted DD Form 2789 (Waiver/Remission of Indebtedness Application); a DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request); and a current statement of concurrence from his spouse.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on    4 January 1971.

2.  On 12 January 1987, the applicant completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) and elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage.  His spouse at the time was Ivonne.

3.  The applicant retired on 31 January 1987.

4.  The applicant’s marriage to Ivonne ended on an unknown date for an unknown reason.

5.  On 3 December 2004, the applicant married Gloria.

6.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Changes in SBP options are not authorized except in specific instances or as authorized by law.

7.  Public Law 94-496, enacted 14 October 1976 (but effective 1 October 1976), provided for the suspension of spouse costs if marriage ends in death or divorce.

8.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985, permitted a previously participating retiree upon remarriage to elect not to resume spouse coverage or to increase reduced coverage for the latter spouse.  Changes must be made prior to the first anniversary of remarriage or else the previously suspended coverage resumes by default on the first day of the month following the first anniversary of the remarriage, with costs owed from that date.  An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law, once made, is irrevocable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage when he retired.  When his first marriage ended, his SBP was suspended.  At the first anniversary of his remarriage in December 2004, his SBP automatically restarted.  The only problem in this case is that the applicant did not notify DFAS that he had remarried until almost three years after his marriage, resulting in a debt retroactive to December 2005.

2.  However, it appears the applicant is currently working to pay off some debts and he cannot afford this additional SBP debt.  Although there is no government error in this case, it would be equitable to correct the applicant’s records to show he requested termination of his SBP within one year of his marriage in December 2004.  This termination would be irrevocable.  His spouse has concurred with his request.

BOARD VOTE:

___xx_____  ___xx___  __xx__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he requested termination of his SBP coverage on 1 January 2005; that his request was processed in a timely manner, thus voiding his current SBP debt; and that he be refunded any SBP premiums he paid due to his December 2004 marriage.




 _   _______ xxx_____________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070019000





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070019000



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007570

    Original file (20100007570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 December 2009, this Board granted him relief by correcting his records to show he elected to terminate his SBP coverage within one year of his marriage to Sandra (he married her on 23 November 2001). On 31 December 2009, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that as a result of the ABCMR's directive, his records were corrected to show he terminated SBP spouse coverage effective 31 October 2001. At the time of his retirement he was married to Linda and elected full spouse coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007403

    Original file (20100007403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * When he retired he was married to his former spouse and they divorced in January 2007 * When he remarried in September 2007, he sent documentation to decline SBP * He believes this information is on record because no premiums were taken out of his retired pay until January 2010 * He has noticed that he now owes $1,700.00 in debt for this clerical error * He submitted paperwork for the "secondary beneficiaries" prior to the birth of his fourth child and his name was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028852

    Original file (20100028852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he elected to discontinue participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and dismissal of the $10,502.66 debt established by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) for SBP premiums he did not pay when he remarried after he retired from military service. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he elected to discontinue participation in the SBP or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014175

    Original file (20130014175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law, once made, is irrevocable. When he and Maureen were divorced, the coverage did not change but the spouse premiums were suspended. The applicant does not now have the option to terminate his SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013841

    Original file (20110013841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was informed he could elect to enroll his current spouse in the SBP by filing out the appropriate forms. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1995, permitted a previously participating retiree upon remarriage to elect not to resume spouse coverage or to increase reduced coverage for the latter spouse (requiring a payback with interest of SBP premiums prior to the first anniversary of the remarriage). This statement shows whether or not SBP premiums are being deducted from a retiree's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013040

    Original file (20100013040.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse coverage. The applicant states: * He nor his wife wishes to be covered by the SBP * he assumed after being retired for 43 years and having lost his first wife the SBP no longer applied * he is a retired lieutenant colonel (LTC) who retired in October 1967 and elected to participate in the SBP with spouse coverage * his first wife died in 2001, he was 81 years old at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074802C070403

    Original file (2002074802C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SBP provides a survivor 55 percent of a participant’s military retired pay. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the SBP in March 1990. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested on 1 August 1997 not to resume his spouse SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005870C070208

    Original file (20040005870C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. When a member elects spouse coverage, that election is normally irrevocable. His spouse SBP coverage had been suspended for 6 years when he remarried in February 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011948

    Original file (20140011948.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, through a member of congress, in effect, correction of his record to show: * he elected not to resume Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his current spouse in conjunction with remarriage * recoupment of premiums paid 2. Only upon receipt of the marriage certificate some 24 years after the applicant's second marriage did the DFAS resume SBP coverage resulting in a debt of $63,932.30 for unpaid premiums beginning the first month following his first anniversary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020841

    Original file (20090020841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the following: * he was never informed he had to decline the SBP within 1 year of his divorce from his former spouse * he received no written communications from the military to keep him informed of these circumstances * the Tennessee Army National Guard requested that he complete a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) in 2008 for inclusion in his application for retired pay * he completed the DD Form 2656 and declined SBP 3. On 18 October 1991, the...