Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511534C070209
Original file (9511534C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that her records be corrected to show that she reenlisted on 11 July 1994 for a period of 3 years instead of 2 years and that she be authorized repayment of $568.73 that was recouped from her pay as an unearned enlistment bonus.

3.  The applicant states, in effect, that she reenlisted on 11 July 1994 for a period of two years because that was the most she could reenlist for without exceeding the retention control point (RCP) for her grade.  She further states that had she been informed that her enlistment bonus was going to be recouped, she would have requested an exception to policy to exceed her RCP and would have reenlisted for an additional year to avoid the recoupment.  However, after being informed that her enlistment bonus was being recouped, she submitted her request which was approved by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel (ODCSPER).

4.  The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 2 March 1989 for a period of 6 years, for training in military occupational specialty 63H, and for a cash bonus in the amount of $4,500.00.  The scheduled date of the expiration of her term of service was to be 1 March 1995.  

5.  On 11 July 1994 she reenlisted in the pay grade of E-4 for a period of 2 years. 

6.  On 5 November 1994 the applicant submitted a request to increase her period of reenlistment from 2 years to 3 years due to the recoupment of the unearned portion of her enlistment bonus.  The ODCSPER approved her request on 22 November 1994.

7.  Army Regulation 601-280, paragraph 8-22b, states that an enlistment bonus recipient who is discharged and immediately reenlists before completing the obligated service will not be required to refund the unearned portion as long as the reenlistment is for at least 2 years beyond the time which the enlistment bonus was paid.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The failure of retention personnel to properly counsel the applicant concerning her reenlistment has worked an injustice upon her.

2.  In order to have been eligible to retain the unearned portion of her enlistment bonus, the applicant needed to reenlist for a period of 3 years.

3.  Had the applicant been properly advised of her available options, as well as the policy concerning bonus recoupment, it is reasonable to presume that she would have elected to reenlist for 4 years so as to avoid bonus recoupment.

4.  Therefore, it would be equitable and just to correct the applicant’s term of service to reflect 3 years instead of 2 years and return that portion of her enlistment bonus which was recouped through no fault of her own.

5.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned reenlisted on 11 July 1994 for a period of 3 years and by reimbursing her with that portion of the enlistment bonus which was recouped as a result of her 2-year reenlistment on 11 July 1994. 

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608515C070209

    Original file (9608515C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he reenlisted on 22 November 1994 for a period of 3 years instead of 2 years and that he be authorized repayment of $326.94 that was recouped from his pay as an unearned enlistment bonus. It opined, in effect, that subsequent to the applicant’s reenlistment, the applicable regulation was changed to allow soldiers serving in the pay grade of E-4 who enlisted for a period of 6 years to reenlist for a period of 3 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605183C070209

    Original file (9605183C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he reenlisted on 17 February 1993 for a period of 4 years instead of 3 years and that he be authorized repayment of $493.73 that was recouped from his pay as an unearned enlistment bonus. Had he been informed that his enlistment bonus was going to be recouped, he would have reenlisted for an additional year to avoid the recoupment. It further recommended that the applicant’s request to extend his reenlistment of 17 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605188C070209

    Original file (9605188C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    She goes on to state that she believes that she has been unfairly assessed in the recoupment of her SRB because she had served 4 years of her 6-year reenlistment and had reclassified to a shortage MOS. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511845C070209

    Original file (9511845C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that recoupment of the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) be stopped and that the debt be remitted. It opined that in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 recoupment of the unearned portion of an SRB is required when a soldier voluntarily reclassifies out of the bonus MOS. Inasmuch as there are provisions for allowing soldiers to retain their bonus entitlements when they are reclassified by the Department into a different MOS to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010241

    Original file (20100010241.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 July 2006, by memorandum, her immediate commander notified her of his intent to initiate separation action against her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5-8, by reason of parenthood (failure to maintain an FCP). On 11 July 2006, her immediate commander initiated separation action against her under the provisions of chapter 5-8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of failure to maintain an FCP. With respect to the separation code, the evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012476

    Original file (20140012476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Program – U.S. Army Delayed Entry Program) shows: * she enlisted for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist) * she enlisted under the U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (Reduced Military Service Obligation (MSO) Enlistment Bonus 3 Years Active and 3 Years Selected Reserve) * she was authorized an enlistment bonus in the amount of $30,000 2. Enlistment bonuses for RA Soldiers are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000407

    Original file (20090000407.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    That memorandum stated that a member with an enlistment (or reenlistment) bonus who is discharged for immediate reenlistment or appointment (as officers) in a Military Department for which no bonus or special pay is paid, may be considered to have completed the full term of service for which the bonus was paid. The advisory opinion did, however, point out that each Service Secretary has the authority to render a case-by-case determination to waive recoupment action when such recoupment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605486C070209

    Original file (9605486C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) that was recouped from him be given back to him. APPLICANT STATES: That the unearned portion of his SRB was recouped from him under the false assumption that his separation was due to his own misconduct. In view of the preceding, the applicant’s separation for weight control failure was properly considered voluntary for the purpose of the collection of the unearned portion of his SRB monies.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360

    Original file (BC 2014 00360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code “JBK.” Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code “JBK.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007351

    Original file (20080007351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the recoupment of her Selective Enlistment Bonus (SEB) be recalculated. On 18 January 2008, in a response to a Congressional Inquiry, the Director, DFAS, stated that the applicant's debt was the result of recoupment of her SEB based on her not completing the entire 3 years and 25 days of her contracted enlistment. He further states that the applicant was voluntarily separated by reason of pregnancy at her own request on 22 February 2007, prior to her...