Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511056C070209
Original file (9511056C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3.  The applicant states that he was on vacation with his wife at the time the notice from the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) arrived notifying him that he would have to be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve by 26 August 1995.  He goes on to state that the letter was unclear as to when the option election statement had to be returned but he understood that it would have to be before his mandatory removal date of 26 August 1995.  He further states that he returned the option statement electing transfer to the Retired Reserve and shortly thereafter received orders discharging him from the USAR.  

4.  The applicant's military records show that the ARPERCEN notified the applicant on 8 September 1993 that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.

5.  On 26 April 1995 the ARPERCEN notified the applicant by mail that he had completed the maximum allowable service under the law and that he must either be transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged by 26 August 1995.  The notification letter contained an option form for the applicant to complete and specified that it must be returned no later than the suspense date indicated (26 May 1995).

6.  The applicant completed the option form on 27 June 1995, a month after the suspense date indicated on the letter of notification.  However, because the applicant failed to respond by the established suspense date, discharge orders were published on 16 June 1995 discharging him effective 25 August 1995. 

7.  Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail and transfer of Army Reserve soldiers.  Chapter 7 of the regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

8.  Due to recent Departmental changes, certain benefits, such as commissary and post exchange privileges, accrue to Reservists with more than 20 of qualifying service who are transferred to the Retired Reserve that do not accrue to those who are discharged.  

9. Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, established the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted soldiers from the reserve components.  Paragraph 1-30 stated, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was evidence of manifest error or fraud.  After the effective date of discharge, orders could be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or correct administrative errors such as errors concerning rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the notification letter was unclear as to when the election statement was to be returned to the ARPERCEN is without merit.  Not only was the notification letter very specific regarding the date the option statement was to be returned, but the letter was a standard military letter format containing a suspense date that should have easily been understood by someone of the applicant’s rank and experience.

2.  However, it is not unreasonable to expect the Department to revoke the discharge orders if the election option statement was received prior to the effective date of discharge from the USAR.  While the Board recognizes that suspense dates are established to ensure actions are accomplished in a timely manner, extenuating circumstances that may arise that cause an individual to miss an established suspense date should not necessarily serve as the basis for denying an individual a benefit that they might otherwise be entitled.

3.  In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:                 

	a.  by voiding the 25 August 1995 discharge from the Army Reserve of the individual concerned; and

	b.  by showing that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 25 August 1995.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608861C070209

    Original file (9608861C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He states, in effect, that he was not given the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve and that when he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve in October 1994, because of the frustration he was experiencing in not receiving answers to his letters to the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), he was informed by a letter from the ARPERCEN dated 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607938C070209

    Original file (9607938C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, it is reasonable to presume that had the applicant been given the proper guidance regarding transfer to the Retired Reserve prior to his being discharged from the USAR, he would have elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve because he had received the notification indicating his eligibility for receipt of Reserve retired pay at age 60. In view of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610340C070209

    Original file (9610340C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He states that until he submitted a request to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in 1994 he was under the impression that he was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) because he continued to receive statements of his retirement points. In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509392C070209

    Original file (9509392C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, inasmuch as he separated from active duty under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program (VSIP), he is obligated to remain in the USAR in some capacity as a condition of receiving his annual VSI payments. Although it is a requirement for USAR soldiers to request transfer to the Retired Reserve or another USAR Control Group in lieu of being...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607980C070209

    Original file (9607980C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 15 December 1984 and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same day. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081455C070215

    Original file (2002081455C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her discharge be revoked and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. In support of her application, she submits copies of her: Election of Options Form; two follow-up requests dated 11 December 1997 and 14 June 2002; response memorandum from the 90 th Regional Support Team (RST), dated 25 July 2002; Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 21 February 1991; Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511563C070209

    Original file (9511563C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 23 December 1965 and was promoted to the rank of captain on 8 July 1969. On 18 October 1990 the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) sent the applicant a notice informing him that he had been twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel and that he was required to complete and return an option selection form within 30 days or he would be discharged in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609813C070209

    Original file (9609813C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, there is a letter from the ARPERCEN dated 22 July 1993 informing the applicant that he could not be transferred to the USAR because discharge orders had already been published. However, it appears that the applicant was either not informed that he was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve or that he had to submit a request to be transferred to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004504C070206

    Original file (20050004504C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he retired on 21 April 1993 and was assigned to the US Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group, by Orders Number 24-9, published by Headquarters (Hqs), 108th Division (Training [tng]), dated 25 March 1993. The evidence shows that orders were later published releasing the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and he was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 15 December 1995. Based on the evidence provided, it would be equitable and just to correct the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069110C070402

    Original file (2002069110C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed after the effective date of discharge unless there was a manifest error or fraud. Because entitlement laws have changed, the applicant is now eligible for “Gray Area” benefits from a discharged status and his retired pay will not be jeopardized by...