Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510990C070209
Original file (9510990C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device (BSM).

APPLICANT STATES:  That the two medals requested were left off of his DD Form 214.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 13 October 1965 and after training as a radio operator served 1 year, 5 months, and 24 days in Vietnam.  He was honorably discharged on 12 September 1968.

The record also reflects that on 7 July 1968 general order 223, 71st Evacuation Hospital, awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam on 6 July 1968.

The record contains no evidence, however, that he was either recommended for or awarded a BSM with “V” during his service.

Army Regulation 600-22-8, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the Army of the United States after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself by heroic or meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy; or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  A “V” device is worn to denote participation in acts of heroism involving conflict with an armed enemy.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  Based on a review of the available records, there is no documentation to suggest that he was recommended for or awarded the BSM or the BSM with “V”.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

NOTE:  Since the record reflects that he was awarded the Purple Heart, the Commander, US Army Reserve Personnel Center will be requested to correct his records accordingly.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007766

    Original file (20140007766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Silver Star * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device * BSM for meritorious service * two Purple Hearts * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB for action in ground combat against a hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057743C070420

    Original file (2001057743C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with one oak leaf cluster and the Purple Heart. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show all of his awards. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Registrar, provides, in pertinent part that the 1 st Battalion, 12 th Cavalry, 1 st Cavalry Division was awarded the Valorous Unit Award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088647C070403

    Original file (2003088647C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are also no other award orders or other documents on file in the MPRJ that indicate that the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM with “V” Device while serving in the RVN. Paragraph 6-5 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the “V” Device. However, although the record confirms he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service, it contains no evidence to indicate that he received the “V” Device with this award or with any other award he received during his tenure...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014505

    Original file (20130014505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Newspaper article * DD Form 214 * Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's SS order confirms he was a medic who refused evacuation at the time he was wounded in action in order to treat casualties. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068168C070402

    Original file (2002068168C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 15 April 1969 to 16 March 1971 by Department of the Army General Order Number 5, dated 1973. NOTE : Request that the Army Review Boards Agency, Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021485

    Original file (20110021485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. Mr. HEH states he served with the applicant in Vietnam and they were both exposed to heavy shelling, rocket attacks, and small arms fire from the enemy. His request for correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and BSM with "V" device was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record. The applicant’s claim that he sustained fragment wounds to his back during a rocket attack is not supported by the available evidence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012114

    Original file (20110012114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded a second award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and that all of his authorized awards be added to his DD Form 214 ( Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served 4 years, 1 month, and 14 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080677C070215

    Original file (2002080677C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his second award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, that he be issued the second award of the BSM and that he be awarded the Purple Heart. Accordingly, the Board finds that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for his injury on 23 February 1969. b. by correcting his records to show that he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device and issuing him a "V" Device for wear on his already awarded BSM; and

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082529C070215

    Original file (2002082529C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Air Medal (AM) with "V" Device. It also shows that he participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam and is entitled to be awarded three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application that he was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053618C070420

    Original file (2001053618C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service record which shows that he was awarded the PH. Nor is there any evidence of record which shows he was recommended for the award. The evidence of record shows that the applicant met the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of 10 January 1967 to 29 November 1968.