Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510673C070209
Original file (9510673C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, discharge upgrade.  The applicant contends that he should have an honorable discharge as he never received a general or special court-marital or spent time in confinement, 

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 May 1954 for 3 years.  He was discharged on 18 November 1954 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  On 19 November 1954 he reenlisted for 3 years. 

His disciplinary record reflects that he received 3 summary and 1 special court-martials. 

On 27 September 1957, a psychiatric examination found no signs of significant psychiatric illness and was psychiatrically cleared for administrative action as
deemed necessary.

On 9 October 1957 the applicant was recommended for elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208.  In his statement, the commanding officer noted that the applicant had 4 court-martials and since being assigned to his unit has made no attempt to become a satisfactory soldier.  On 16 October 1957 the applicant was advised of the separation action being taken against him. 

The applicant’s record indicates that a board of officers was convened on 16 October 1957.  The board’s proceedings are not part of the applicant’s record, however, discharge with a undesirable discharge was apparently recommended and was subsequently approved.  The applicant was discharged on 8 November 1957 under other than honorable conditions.  

There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 8 November 1957, the date he was discharged.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 8 November 1960.

The application is dated 27 September 1995 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059810C070421

    Original file (2001059810C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 11 January 1954, the applicant’s commander requested that he appear before a board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010996

    Original file (20060010996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010996 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608704C070209

    Original file (9608704C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He reenlisted on 12 December 1952 and was dishonorably discharged on 13 August 1954 pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019545

    Original file (20110019545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record includes a letter from the NPRC Records Reconstruction Branch, dated 15 January 1991, informing him he had been erroneously issued an NA Form 13038 showing his service was terminated by "general discharge under honorable conditions." The applicant is advised to destroy the erroneous NA Form 13038 in his possession showing he was separated by "General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001108

    Original file (20090001108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 November 1957, a psychiatric evaluation was conducted on the applicant and the psychiatrist who performed this examination essentially opined that the applicant was extremely poorly motivated for further military service, that he was not a suitable candidate for rehabilitative efforts, and that he should be presented to a Board of Officers for consideration for separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Unfitness - Frequent Incidents of a Discreditable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510406C070209

    Original file (9510406C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. On 11 August 1954 he reported to a military physician that he had “Fell off horse two months ago and has had pain in his back since then.” During that examination he demonstrated tenderness over his left flank and hip, but was not diagnosed as having serious injuries. The time for the applicant to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605682C070209

    Original file (9605682C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, although he reenlisted, the commander never recommended him for the appointment. A review of the applicant’s records maintained by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) show that the applicant, while attempting to obtain service connected disability from the DVA for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in 1990, claimed that he had been promised by his commander in Korea that he would be recommended for promotion to warrant officer if he reenlisted. Failure to file within 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062167C070421

    Original file (2001062167C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was dishonorably discharged on 8 October 1957.Army Regulation 635-200, at paragraph 3-10, then in effect, provided that a soldier would be given a DD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015241

    Original file (20080015241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant’s available military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 19 May 1950 and was discharged on 16 January 1958 under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The evidence of record shows that the applicant initially entered active duty on 19 May 1950, was honorably discharged for the purpose of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509383C070209

    Original file (9509383C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 19 October 1963. PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 19 October 1966.