Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509383C070209
Original file (9509383C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his records be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 19 October 1963.  He indicates that he has been a good citizen and that a grave injustice was done to him.

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

During the period 21 May 1946-6 November 1947, 27 September 1950-4 April 1951, and 5 April 1951-18 April 1957, the applicant served on active duty (8 years and 7 days and    13 days of lost time).

On 19 April 1957, he reenlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-5.

On 4 May 1963, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for being absent without leave for the period 1-2 May 1963. His punishment was a forfeiture and official reprimand.

On 14 October 1963, he accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ, for defrauding the Government by falsely and fraudulently claiming travel and dislocation allowances for his wife and 3 children; for obtaining a travel voucher and neglecting to declare use of the same; and, for falsely claiming travel by privately owned vehicle on 5 September 1963.  His punishment was a reduction to pay grade E-4, a forfeiture and an official reprimand.

On 18 October 1963, a bar to reenlistment was approved based on his prior NJP’s and his excessive indebtedness.


On 19 October 1963, he was discharged, under honorable conditions (general discharge), based on the expiration of his term of service.  His records show that he had 14 years, 6 months and 7 days of creditable service and 14 days of lost time. .

There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (AR 15-185, paragraph 8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the ABCMR should commence on the date of final denial by the ADRB.  In complying with this decision, the Board has adopted the broader policy of calculating the 3 year time limit from the date of exhaustion in any case where a lower level administrative remedy is utilized.  The Board will continue to excuse any failure to timely file when it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on        19 October 1963, the date he was discharged.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 19 October 1966.

The application is dated 3 July 1995 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.


DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019028

    Original file (20130019028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he served 16 years of service and would like his general discharge upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. On 22 April 1951, he reenlisted for a period of six years and served until he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-4 on 1 May 1957 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017307

    Original file (20100017307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 31 October 1969, 1 June 1966, and 1 June 1963 which show his service number as "RA XX 8XX XXX." The evidence of record shows the applicant's service number as "RA XX 2XX XXX." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the third digit of his service number in item 2 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 1969 and replacing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011289

    Original file (20120011289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form further shows he was awarded the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Vietnam Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) 13. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 26 February 1969 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005419

    Original file (20090005419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show his service in Korea and Germany. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 215; a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 May 1971; and a copy of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) covering the period 9 April 1957 to 8 April 1969 in support of his application. However, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to show his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089103C070212

    Original file (2003089103C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 31 January 1966 and 31 December 1968 (whichever is appropriate) be corrected to show all of the awards and decorations that he is authorized for service in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant's WD AGO Form 24A (Service Record) and DA Forms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001502

    Original file (20110001502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. removal of two records of nonjudicial punishment (NJP), dated 23 May 1957 and 24 June 1958, from the DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ)) of his late father, a former service member (FSM); b. the FSM's posthumous promotion to colonel (COL); c. copies of the two investigating officer's (IO) reports; and d. identification of his father's accuser. On 23 May 1957, NJP under Article 15, UCMJ, was imposed against the FSM after it was reported that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010365

    Original file (20110010365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains five different DD Forms 214, none of which indicate he was wounded in combat or previously awarded the Purple Heart. It was reestablished by the President of the United States per War Department General Orders Number 3 in 1932. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007242

    Original file (20080007242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Even if the regulatory authority cited on his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021311

    Original file (20140021311.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) dated 18 July 1951 to show he was: * discharged in Sasebo, Japan as a member of Company B, 1st Battalion, 27th Regimental Combat Team (RCT) (Wolfhounds), under the 25th Infantry Division that crossed the Han River in Korea on 7 March 1951 * awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) while attached to the 25th Infantry Division * awarded the Distinguished...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081387C070215

    Original file (2002081387C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He states that he was ordered to active duty for training in April 1957 and completed his training in July 1957. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.