APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which preclude reenlistment.
APPLICANT STATES: He states, in effect that his reentry code is unjust because he was not a bad soldier; that he did not have any Article 15; that he held several positions in his company; that he had already reenlisted to go to Hawaii; that his unit did not force him out of the Army and that he requested separation from the Army.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 25 October 1969. He completed 12 years of formal education. On 4 April 1989, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years. He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 63W10 (Light Wheel Vehicle Repairer). The highest grade he achieved was pay grade E-4.
On 30 November 1992, a bar to reenlistment was initiated against the applicant by his commander. The recommendation was based on the applicants failure of the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC), for repeated failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test and for failure of map reading and navigation. The applicant was counseled and advised of the basis for the action.
On 22 December 1992, the applicant was informed that the bar to reenlistment was approved and he was advised of his rights to appeal.
On 11 March 1993, the applicant signed a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting that he be discharged from the service in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment of which he was unable to overcome; that he understood that if he is separated before his normal expiration term of service is approved, it will be for his own convenience; that he understood that recoupment of unearned portions of Enlistment Bonus (EB)/Selective Bonus (SRB) is required, and that once separated he will not be permitted to reenlist at a later date.
On 16 April 1993, the applicants request for discharge was approved by the battalion commander. On 21 April 1993, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-4, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b (Locally imposed bar to reenlistment), with an honorable discharge. He had completed 4 years and 18 days of active military service. He was awarded the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Service Ribbon. He was given a reentry code of RE-3.
On 1 January 1996, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for a change of the narrative reason for separation.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 16 covers discharges caused by changes in service obligations. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive DA imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar may apply for immediate discharge. Incident to the request the member must state that he understands that recoupment of unearned portions of any enlistment or reenlistment bonus is required and that later reenlistment is not permitted
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.
RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 9, 10, 13, and 14 of Army Regulation 635-200.
Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program). There is no evidence that the applicant has applied through his recruiter for a waiver.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement
2. The Regulation requires that at the time of discharge reentry codes will be assigned based on the service records and the reason for the discharge; therefore, the applicant was assigned reentry eligibility code RE-3.
3. There appears to be no basis for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which established the basis for the reentry eligibility codes.
3. In view of the circumstances in this case, the assigned reentry eligibility code was and still is appropriate.
4. There is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507486C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. On 1 January 1996, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his reentry code. There is no evidence that the applicant has applied through his recruiter for a waiver.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507436C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. On 1 January 1996, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his reentry code. There is no evidence that the applicant has applied through his recruiter for a waiver.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085887C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. This includes anyone with a Department of the Army or locally imposed bar to reenlistment in effect at the time of separation. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicant's prior service, his personal problems, and his good post-service conduct; none of these factors, either individually or in sum, provided a basis to grant the relief requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084646C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that her reentry (RE) code of 4 be upgraded to a 2, that her separation code be changed, and that the bar to reenlistment be removed from her records. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant requested to be discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 5b after being barred from reenlistment. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was given RE code 4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059599C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Accordingly, on 10 May 1990, the applicant was separated from the Army under the provisions of chapter 16-5b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a locally imposed bar to reenlistment with an honorable discharge. This includes anyone with a locally imposed bar to reenlistment in effect at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015110
The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment (RE) code of RE-3 & 4 be changed to a more favorable RE code. Paragraph 16-5, in effect at the time, provided the authority for Soldiers denied or ineligible for continued active duty service to be separated upon their request. However, the RE-3 code does allow his enlistment with a waiver.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058673C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On the same date (22 June 1989), the applicant was notified that he was being barred from reenlistment. In his request, he stated that he understood that if his request for separation was approved that recoupment of unearned portions of any enlistment or reenlistment bonus was required and that he would not be allowed to reenlist at a later date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017394
A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 13 March 1990, shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 16, due to a bar to reenlistment. The regulation in effect at the time stated the reason for discharge based on separation code "KGF" was "[Headquarters, Department of the Army]-imposed bar to reenlistment or locally-imposed bar to reenlistment" and the regulatory authority was Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010572
On 1 December 1992, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 16-5, by reason of inability to overcome locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The regulation, in effect at the time, states the reason for discharge based on separation code KGF is HQDA [Headquarters, Department of the Army] imposed bar to reenlistment; or locally imposed bar to reenlistment and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075483C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, that shows irregularity in the assignment of his RE code.