Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510392C070209
Original file (9510392C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests his records be corrected to show entitlement to the Silver Star (SS), the Purple Heart (PH) and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Distinguished Service Order, Second Class.

3.  During the period 17 January 1949-19 January 1950 and  16 October 1950-11 July 1955, the applicant served on active duty as an enlisted soldier.

4.  On 12 July 1955, he was commissioned as a Second Lieutenant, Artillery and his service thereafter was continuous.

5.  During the period 30 July 1969-12 June 1971, he served in the RVN.

6.  On 10 April 1971, a recommendation for award of the SS was prepared and forwarded to the Commander United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (COMUSMACV).  The Commander, II Field Force Vietnam recommended approval for the regrading to the Bronze Star Medal for Valor (BSM(V)) and the Commander, Third Regional Assistance Command, Vietnam, approved that regrading.  On 8 October 1971, COMUSMACV published General Orders Number 4365 which awarded the BSM (V), to the applicant. 

7.  On 15 May 1971, the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam authorized the applicant to accept and wear the RVN Distinguished Service Order, Second Class.

8.  On 17 February 1971, the applicant was notified of his pending release from active duty, based on the current and contemplated strength reductions. 

9.  On 2 August 1971, a physical examination cleared the applicant for separation and retirement.  There was no mention of wounds by either the applicant or physicians.

10.  On 27 August 1971, the applicant requested he be voluntarily retired effective 31 October 1971.

11.  On 31 October 1971, he was separated from active duty in pay grade 05, under Army Regulation 635-100 and placed on the retired list effective 1 November 1971.  His Report of Separation indicates that he had a total of 22 years,       9 months and 14 days of creditable service.

12.  On 11 January 1984, a VA Rating Decision awarded the applicant a service-connected disability rating of          0 percent, effective 7 May 1982, for various medical conditions.  In 1995 and 1996, these percentages were increased. 

13.  On 5 February 1997, the Commander, Total Army Personnel Command, rendered an opinion (COPY ATTACHED) in which the requirements for award of the SS and the PH were set forth; the applicant’s allegations were refuted; and, a recommendation that his record be corrected to show entitlement to the RVN Distinguished Service Order, Second Class.  Further, that command directed the correction of that portion of the applicant’s Report of Separation pertaining to his awards by correction of selected entries. The recommendation was that the applicant’s request be denied.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the RVN Distinguished Service Order, Second Class should be entered on his Report of Separation.

2.  There is no evidence that he was awarded the SS; however, there is evidence that the command downgraded the initial recommendation to an appropriate award.

3.  There is no evidence that he was entitled to award of the PH.

4.  In view of the foregoing, it would be proper to correct his Report of Separation, but only as shown below.


RECOMMENDATION:

1.  That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing his entitlement to the RVN Distinguished Service Order, Second Class.

2.  That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013888

    Original file (20130013888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the SS or PH (3rd OLC). Copies of his awards and decorations that show, in pertinent part, he was awarded the: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device (4th OLC) - the BSM with "V" Device was awarded on two occasions, for heroism in the RVN on 21 August 1969 and 1 November 1969 * PH (2nd OLC) for wounds received in action in the RVN on 21 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021574

    Original file (20100021574.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows he was wounded in action once during his service in Vietnam and received one award of the PH. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 10 September 1969 through 9 June 1971; b. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214; and c. adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016923

    Original file (20070016923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 3-16 provides guidance on the ARCOM and states, in pertinent part, that it may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. In effect, his review of the DA Form 2-1 and his signature on the DD Forms 214 were the applicant's verification that the information contained in his record and on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016181C080407

    Original file (20070016181C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he also served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) as an infantryman and was wounded, and he feels he deserves a second award of the CIB for this combat service in the RVN. The applicant's record also shows that during his RVN tour, he was awarded the Air Medal and a second award of the BSM, which were not included on his final DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015361

    Original file (20070015361.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 31 May 1971 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show the inactive service he completed from 1 July through 25 August 1949 in Item 22a(2) (Other Service), and that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) be corrected to reflect all awards listed on a National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) Letter he was issued. The evidence of record further confirms the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014505

    Original file (20130014505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Newspaper article * DD Form 214 * Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's SS order confirms he was a medic who refused evacuation at the time he was wounded in action in order to treat casualties. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004965C071029

    Original file (20070004965C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant received three awards of the BSM, two of which were for meritorious service and third, which was for heroism (valor). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002838

    Original file (20110002838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to Company C, 5th SF Group (Airborne), 1st SF, performing duties in MOS 11F as an intelligence specialist during his RVN tour of duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 29 March 1966 through 25 November 1968 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013504

    Original file (20140013504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his highest grade held as specialist five (SP5/E-5) and award of the: * Silver Star (SS) * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) - 2nd Award * Brave Eagle Coin 2. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the...