Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013504
Original file (20140013504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013504 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his highest grade held as specialist five (SP5/E-5) and award of the:

* Silver Star (SS)
* Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) - 2nd Award
* Brave Eagle Coin

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that these awards are missing from his DD Form 214 and he received a battle field promotion to SP5 during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

3.  The applicant provides:

* General orders, dated 18 December 1969
* BSM Certificate, dated 18 August 1969
* BSM (OLC) Certificate, dated 20 October 1969
* Transmittal of Awards memorandum, dated 23 February 1970
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 June 1968 and he held military occupational specialty 11H (Infantry Direct Fire Crewman).  He served in the RVN from 6 November 1968 through 5 November 1969 while assigned to Company E, 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  Item 31 (Appointments and Reductions) the following promotions:

* private/E-1 with a date of rank (DOR) of 5 June 1968
* private (PV2)/E-2 with a DOR of 7 August 1968
* private first class (PFC)/E-3 with a DOR of 6 November 1968
* specialist four (SP4)/E-4 temporary with a DOR of 4 March 1969

	b.  item 38 he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for all periods;

	c.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is no evidence in the available records showing he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is no recommendation for or official orders awarding him a second BSM.

4.  He was released from active duty on 4 June 1970.  His DD Form 214, issued at the time of his separation, verifies in Items 5a and b (Grade, Rate or Rank, and Pay Grade) he was a SP4/E-4.  Item 24 of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized:

* National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with three bronze service stars
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device "1960"
* Air Medal (AM)
* Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB)
* Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)
* BSM
5.  Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), issued:

	a.  General Orders Number 10689, dated 18 August 1969, awarding him the BSM from meritorious service for the period 1 December 1968 to 31 July 1969; and

	b.  General Orders Number 14941, dated 18 December 1969, awarding him the SS for gallantry in action on 9 June 1969.

6.  There are no official orders in his service records that show he received a second award of the BSM.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant a second BSM.

8.  He provides a memorandum issued by Headquarters, 1st Battalion, (Airmobile), 501st Infantry, which indicates that he received a Brave Eagle Coin and Citation.  In addition, he provided the following award certificates for the:

* BSM for meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces in the RVN during the period 1 December 1968 to 31 July 1969
* BSM (OLC) for heroism in ground combat on 18 May 1969

9.  A review of his records indicates his entitlement to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year service entirely during the period 7 December 1941 through 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-marital.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the regulatory guidance for award of the VSM.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following four campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968-22 February 1969)
* Tet 69 Counteroffensive 1969 (23 February-8 June 1969)
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 (9 June-31 October 1969)
* Vietnam Winter-Spring (1 November 1969-30 April 1970)

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  The pamphlet shows the 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry, was awarded the:

* RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 15 August 1968-14 May 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 43, dated 1970
* RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period
18 March 1968-2 May 1970 by DAGO 48, dated 1971

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states:

	a.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

	b.  there is no provision to record commemorative coins on discharge documents.

14.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), then in effect, prescribed the policies and procedures for the promotion and reduction of enlisted Soldiers.  Promotions of enlisted personnel to grades E-4 through E-9, were required to be announced in orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his highest grade held as SP5/E-5 and to add the SS, BSM (OLC), and Brave Eagle Coin.

2.  General orders awarded him the SS; therefore, this award should be added to his DD Form 214.

3.  His unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

4.  He participated in four campaigns and is authorized four bronze service star for each campaign; however, his VSM currently shows three bronze service stars.  His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show an additional bronze service star for wear on his previously-awarded VSM.

5.  His records are void of any derogatory information which would have disqualified him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his records should be corrected to show this award.

6.  His records are void of any promotion orders or a recommendation for promotion, and he failed to provide any evidence which shows he was approved for promotion or was promoted to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5.  Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, his DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank as SP4.

7.  It appears the Brave Eagle Coin is a commemorative coin which is not governed by provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-22 and, as a result, is not shown on a discharge document or in the Army inventory for issuance.

8.  His record is void of orders awarding him a second BSM and the award certificate he provided is insufficient evidence to add the BSM (OLC).  Further, there is no evidence of record that shows a higher authority recommended him for or awarded him a second BSM.  Therefore, this award should not be added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

9.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
5 June 1968 through 4 June 1970;

b.  deleting the VSM with three bronze service stars; and

c.  adding the following to his DD Form 214 in:

* item 24–

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Silver Star 
* VSM with four bronze service stars
* RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show:

* SP5/E-5
* Bronze Star Medal (OLC)
* Brave Eagle Coin



      _____________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013504





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013504



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002765

    Original file (20120002765.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued lists the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) * ARCOM with “V” Device * Combat Medical Badge * BSM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 April 1968 through 4 January 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010457

    Original file (20130010457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and all military records to include his medical record to show his award of the Silver Star (SS); and any compensation due as a result of this award, if any. The applicant states the SS is not listed in his military record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028207

    Original file (20100028207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: a. item 5a (Grade Rate or Rank) sergeant (SGT); and b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005519

    Original file (20120005519.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 May 1968. Although the applicant's records were apparently destroyed in the 1973 National Personnel Record Center fire, his DD Form 214 confirms he was promoted to the rank of SSG after completing 1 year of active duty service; two BSM's, two PH's, an ARCOM, and a CIB are among his earned awards; he had no lost time; and the characterization of his service was honorable. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010272

    Original file (20130010272.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he earned the awards and completed the training, and the information should be recorded on his DD Form 214. d. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 20 September 1967 through 7 May 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003334

    Original file (20140003334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was WIA on a third occasion, or any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the PH (2nd OLC). c. The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013714

    Original file (20140013714 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show 15 additional awards of the AM (i.e., the AM with Numeral 16) because he accrued 763 hours of combat assault or combat support flight time. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded more than one AM. e. However, based on the evidence of record (i.e., certification by the operations officer that the applicant accrued 453 flight hours) and the conclusion they were category III...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017949

    Original file (20080017949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Bronze Star Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal; b. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Bronze Star Medal with first oak leaf cluster, Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089378C070403

    Original file (2003089378C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 and orders on file in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) confirm that he attended and completed the NCO Combat Leader’s Course at Fort Benning, between 17 May and 13 August 1968. The evidence of record confirms that orders were issued...