Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510026C070209
Original file (9510026C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his reentry (RE) code of RE-3C be corrected to an RE code of RE-1.  He states that he was assigned the wrong RE code, which is verified by his separation code and the narrative reason for his separation.

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 August 1985, was awarded the military occupational specialty of motor transport operator, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.  

On 17 February 1987 he accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, for twice failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty.

On 10 August 1989 the applicant was released from the Primary Leadership Development Course due to his failure to pass the leadership examination after three retests.

He was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-4 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) at the expiration of his term of service on 5 October 1991.  His DD Form 214 shows that he had served 6 years, 2 months and 5 days of active duty and was assigned an RE code of RE-3C.

RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade requirements of chapter 2, Army Regulation 601-280, to reenlist, or who have been denied reenlistment under the Qualitative Retention Process according to chapter 10, Army Regulation 601-280.

Army Regulation 601-280, paragraph 2-22, specifies that individuals in pay grade E-4 cannot have more than 8 years of total active service at their ETS, as established by a reenlistment.  Paragraph 2-34 specifies that reenlistments must be in periods of 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 years.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 5 October 1991, the date he was separated.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 5 October 1994.

The application is dated 20 June 1995 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004420

    Original file (20090004420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. Soldiers in the rank of PFC who are on a 2-year initial enlistment and who will have 24 months or less of active Federal service on the day they are discharged to reenlist may, if otherwise qualified, to include those with approved waivers, be reenlisted without a grade waiver. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509576C070209

    Original file (9509576C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 601-210, table 3-6, then in effect, listed the various RE codes and describes the reason(s) a soldier is assigned a particular code. The code RE-3C applied to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who did not meet the basic eligibility pay grade requirements of chapter 2, Army Regulation 601-280, or who had been denied reenlistment under the Qualitative Retention Process according to chapter 10, Army Regulation 601-280. The applicant has not presented and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100592C070208

    Original file (2004100592C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100592 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007830

    Original file (20140007830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably discharged from active duty on 7 February 1993 in accordance with chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation) by reason of expiration of term of service. Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of persons, with or without prior service, into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). He was discharged from active duty under chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 at the expiration of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071675C070403

    Original file (2002071675C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his 15 September 1991 DD Form 214 be corrected to show his rank and grade as Specialist Four (SP4) and E-4, respectively, and that his reentry code of 3C be corrected in order for him to return to active duty. In a 24 June 2000 request to a Member of Congress the applicant stated that he needed his rank and reentry code corrected so that he could return to the Army or enlist in the Army Reserve. The preponderance of evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007792

    Original file (20080007792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army Reenlistment Eligibility Codes (RE codes): a. RE–1, applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001123

    Original file (20110001123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation code JBK is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment who were discharged on completion of their enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 2 October 1989 and applicable to the governing regulation, established RE code 3C as the proper reentry code to assign Soldiers separated with a SPD code of JBK, for failure to meet grade and service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021400

    Original file (20130021400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the following items on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * item 13 (Decorations, Medal, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) * item 19 (Mailing Address After Separation) * item 27 (Reenlistment (RE) Code) 2. The evidence of record does not show and the applicant has not provided evidence showing he was awarded any badges or decorations other than those listed on his DD Form 214. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006749

    Original file (20130006749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130006749 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant was a specialist four with 5 years, 3 months, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009906

    Original file (20080009906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 2-22 of this regulation, in effect at the time, states, in pertinent part, that personnel in grade E-2, regardless of years of service completed, are not authorized reenlistment. Since he had completed over 4 months active service, in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 he was not authorized reenlistment and was to be assigned an RE code of RE-3C. These individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment...