Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509652C070209
Original file (9509652C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect entitlement to incapacitation pay, payment of incurred medical expenses and disability retirement.  He notes he was injured in an automobile accident “on [his] way home from drill” and was denied the opportunity to reenlist because of his medical condition.  He states he contacted his Reserve unit on 11 August 1992 and requested “payment for his medical bills, time off from work and authorization to see a military physician.”  He states he had to pay his medical expenses “from a settlement from [an] insurance company....”

3.  Records indicate he was a member of the Army Reserve and on 18 December 1990 reenlisted for a period of 3 years.  His unit was located in Arkadelphia, Arkansas.  

4.  At 1615 hours on 9 August 1992, while enroute to his residence in Hot Springs, Arkansas, he was involved in a motor vehicle accident.  At the time of the accident the applicant was in a travel status following release from his weekend drill (IDT-inactive duty training).  He was able to drive his vehicle to his mother’s house in Hot Springs and from there was taken to the emergency room at St. Joseph’s Regional Hospital where he was treated and released.  A line of duty investigation, which was not completed until 1994, found the applicant’s injuries occurred in the line of duty.

5.  According to medical statements from a medical association in Dallas, Texas the applicant sought non-emergency medical treatment for injuries resulting from his motor vehicle accident on 17 August, 28 August, 14 October and 9 November 1992.  He also received non-emergency medical treatment from the Entralplex Rehabilitation Corporation in Dallas, Texas in September, October and November 1992.

6.  The applicant received an annual NCO performance evaluation report in November 1992 and November 1993.  The November 1992 report reflected completion of a physical training (PT) test prior to his accident while the November 1993 report noted the applicant had a profile prohibiting completion of the annual PT test.

7.  On 17 December 1993, at the expiration of his 3 year contract, the applicant was released from his Reserve unit and on 13 January 1994 was honorably discharge from the Army Reserve.

8.  In March 1994 the applicant’s initial VA disability claim was denied.  He appealed the decision and ultimately was granted a combined 30 percent disability rating effective 28 March 1994 for residuals of the vehicle accident.  Subsequent appeals resulted in an increased combined disability rating of 40 percent retroactive to 28 November 1994.

9.  Army Regulation 135-381 establishes the policies and procedures for entitlement to health care, incapacitation compensation and death benefits for injury, disease, or illness incurred, contracted, or aggravated while traveling to or from IDT.  It notes that travel must be direct and completed within a reasonable amount of time.  Evidence indicates the applicant was released from IDT at approximately 1530 hours on 9 August 1992.  

10.  It notes reimbursement for emergency treatment, such as that provided by paramedics to save the life, limb, or eyesight of a Reserve Component, obtained from civilian medical facilities is authorized. However, reimbursement for nonemergency care furnished by a private hospital, clinic, dentist, physician, nurse or other authorized health care provider is not authorized unless prior written approval is obtained in advance from appropriate authorities Reserve Component commanders a strictly prohibited from authorizing nonemergency care by civilian health care providers regardless of the line of duty status.

11.  Section 204, title 37, United States Code provides authority for continuation of pay and allowances under certain circumstance to soldiers who are disabled in the line of duty from injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated while in a duty or travel status.  Prerequisites for entitlement to incapacitation pay are inability to perform normal military duties or satisfactory demonstration of loss of nonmilitary earned income.  A soldier disabled on or after 30 September 1988 who is determined unable to perform normal military duties may receive full military pay and allowances.  However, if a soldier in this category continues to receive income from non-military sources, this income will be deducted from the incapacitation pay entitlement.  If a soldier can perform normal military duties, but loses nonmilitary income for an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated on or after 30 September 1988, the soldier is entitled upon request, to a portion of pay and allowance.  It would be an amount equal to lost civilian earned income or full pay and allowances, whichever is less.  Incapacitation pay may be paid for up to a maximum of 6 months.  Only the most meritorious request will be approved for payment beyond the 6 months limits and then only with the approval of the Secretary of the Army.

12.  Army Regulation 635-40, which established the policies and provisions for entitlement to disability separation or retirement, states that Reserve Component soldiers who incur injuries while in a travel status to or from IDT are not eligible for referral into the disability system and as such are not eligible for disability separation or retirement.

13.  In the processing of this application an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was provided by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel.  The opinion concluded the applicant should be granted “incapacitation compensation for the six month period beginning 10 August 1992....”

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence confirms the applicant was injured as a result of a motor vehicle accident while in a travel status following release from (IDT).

2.  While his initial medical care on the day of the accident could be considered emergency in nature and as such reimbursable, his follow-up treatment by civilian health care officials in Dallas, Texas was clearly of a non-emergency nature and would not have been authorized for reimbursement.

3.  The applicant was eligible for incapacitation pay.  In view of the length of time which has elapsed since the accident it would be unlikely that his unit would be able to certify he was unable to perform normal military duties subsequent to the accident.  However, the Board accepts the fact that the applicant’s physical profile prohibiting participation in physical training, which was in place as late as November 1993, is sufficient evidence that he was unable to perform those duties.  As such the applicant should be awarded incapacitation pay subject to the deduction of any nonmilitary income.

4.  Notwithstanding the fact that there is no evidence to support the applicant’s contention that his injuries prevented him from continuing his military career, because the injuries occurred while he was in a travel status he would not have been eligible for disability processing.

5.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1.  That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

	a.  by reimbursing the applicant for emergency medical care provided at St. Joseph’s Regional Health Center on 9 August 1992; and

	b.  by awarding the applicant incapacitation pay for 180 days beginning 10 August 1992 subject to deduction of any income from nonmilitary sources.

2.  That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050007590

    Original file (20050007590.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests that the applicant's records be corrected to show that (1) he did not fraudulently request and obtain unauthorized military pay and benefits; (2) he did not improperly receive medical care at government expense; (3) he did not fail to provide evidence that his injury was aggravated while in a duty status; (4) he did not erroneously receive incapacitation pay; (5) the Army National Guard (ARNG) properly reimbursed him and his private insurer for out-of-pocket medical expenses...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03094856C070212

    Original file (03094856C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By 14 August 2001 the Alabama Army National Guard resolved the issue of the applicant’s home of record and initiated a formal line of duty investigation to determine if injuries sustained by the applicant as a result of the March 1999 motor vehicle accident were considered to have occurred in the line of duty. He noted that his “staff has processed incapacitation pay from March 1999 to June 1999 for which he [the applicant] was entitled and [was] coordinating with the medical treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007061

    Original file (20070007061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion enclosed DA Forms 3349s dated 11 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, showing the applicant was on a physical profile during these periods and was unable to perform his military duties and responsibilities. The advisory opinion also stated that Army Regulation 135-381, paragraph 1-8 provides that a member who is unable to perform military duties because of incapacitation is entitled to full pay and allowances, including all incentive pay to which entitled, less any civilian earned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072152C070403

    Original file (2002072152C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s commander stated that his injury was in line of duty. The evidence also shows that the applicant’s commander, on 5 November 1994, determined that the applicant’s injury was in line of duty, and that he was transported to the Fairview Ridges Hospital emergency room. The applicant may yet want to submit a claim to his commander for his expenses, based on the determination made by this Board to correct the 14 August 1995 finding on the line of duty investigation to “in line of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022642

    Original file (20100022642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. although his medical condition was determined to be in the line of duty (LOD), he did not receive INCAP pay for the period he was not allowed to perform IDTs, nor was he processed by a medical or physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB); b. he received pay for his active duty service performed from 20 January through 5 June 1998 and INCAP pay for the months August through October 1998; and c. he was discharged from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606417C070209

    Original file (9606417C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was a special forces engineer (MOS 183C0) and since his duties included parachuting, the period during which, because of his knee injury, he could not perform “his normal military duties”, to include jump duties, was in fact incapacitating from 23 February 1986, the day of his injury, to 30 April 1990, the day he was restored to jump status, even though he did perform light duty during that period, but could not perform his MOS-required duties. Counsel goes on to describe the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011561C080213

    Original file (20070011561C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 October 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070011561 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In a memorandum dated 1 April 2004, the applicant’s unit requested the applicant be paid incapacitation pay beyond six months. The memorandum noted the line of duty finding had been approved on 9 October 2003 and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011561

    Original file (20070011561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a memorandum dated 1 April 2004, the applicant’s unit requested the applicant be paid incapacitation pay beyond six months. The memorandum noted the line of duty finding had been approved on 9 October 2003 and the applicant had been paid incapacitation pay from 22 September 2003 through February 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the request to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011561

    Original file (20070011561.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a memorandum dated 9 September 2005, the applicant’s unit requested the applicant be paid incapacitation pay beyond six months and restated the facts noted in its 1 April 2004 memorandum on the same matter. Members authorized incapacitation pay are not allowed to attend IDT or to acquire retirement points for drills. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005128

    Original file (20080005128.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DFAS confirmed that the applicant is entitled to INCAP pay, reduced by the amount of earned income she received in her Federal civilian job for the period 9 February through 28 March 2006. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show she applied for INCAP pay for the period 9 February through 28 March 2006; that her request was approved in a timely manner; and that she be paid INCAP pay for that period, reduced, if appropriate, by the amount she still owes as a result of...