Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509336C070209
Original file (9509336C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That her educational loans be paid under the provisions of the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) addendum she executed with her reenlistment contract.

APPLICANT STATES:  That she reenlisted to establish eligibility for the Montgomery G.I. Bill (MGIB), and executed a SLRP addendum in conjunction with that contract.  The fact that an administrative error was made on the contract is not her fault and her loans should be paid in accordance with a SLRP addendum signed by an agent of the Government.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant’s military records show:

She enlisted in the Regular Army for 6 years on 30 January 1980 for 3 years in pay grade E-1.  At the time of her enlistment she was administered the Army Forces Qualification Test (AFQT), on which she scored 19 percentile.  She was awarded the military occupational specialty of petroleum supply specialist and was promoted to pay grade E-4.  She was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group on 30 November 1981 by reason of pregnancy.  

On 1 November 1983 she accepted an assignment to a USAR unit as a clerk typist.  She remained assigned to that unit, was promoted to pay grade E-5, and reenlisted for 6 years on 10 September 1985, giving her an expiration of her term of service (ETS) of 9 September 1991.  On 18 October 1990 she reenlisted for 6 years.  In conjunction with that contract she executed a DA Form 5261-4-R, SLRP Addendum.

Army Regulation 135-7, Incentive Programs, chapter 5.1, Student Loan Repayment Program, restricts the SLRP to those reservists who either enlist or reenlist and who are classified in Mental Category I, II, or IIIA (AFQT score of 50 or higher).  This educational incentive may only be elected at the time of enlistment or reenlistment.  This incentive pays a limited sum of money to a lending institution on the anniversary date of an enlistment or reenlistment.  These payments continue on a yearly basis unless the soldier loses eligibility by being separated from his or her unit.

In the processing of this case an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the Chief, Army Reserve (CAR).  The CAR stated that since the applicant had not previously had eligibility established for the MGIB, she was eligible to reenlist at anytime for that option.  However, since her reenlistment contract cites an incorrect authority for an MGIB reenlistment, her reenlistment is considered erroneous since it was executed prior to the 90-day reenlistment window.  The CAR recommends that the Board correct the authority for the applicant’s reenlistment and authorize her payment of her student loans under the SLRP.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  The applicant was not eligible for the SLRP with an AFQT score of 19 percentile.  As such, issues concerning whether the applicant reenlisted within the 90 day reenlistment window or whether the proper authority was cited on her reenlistment contract are immaterial.

2.  While it is unfortunate that the applicant was led to believe that she would receive benefits under the SLRP, the fact remains that she was not entitled to that benefit.  To give her the SLRP would be giving her a benefit not given to other soldiers in like circumstances.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605309C070209

    Original file (9605309C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that she executed a Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) addendum to her enlistment contract which was properly validated by her recruiter and that her student loans be paid for in accordance with the terms of that addendum. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: She enlisted in the Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 August 1986 for 6 years in pay grade E-3. The applicant was never completed a properly countersigned SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014171

    Original file (20130014171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She enlisted in the CAARNG on 13 March 2001 for the SLRP and bonus incentives. Years later her records were audited and a determination was made to recoup the SLRP incentive that was paid over the years. The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) * NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E * NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 – Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum – ARNG) * NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex S to DD Form 4 – SLRP Addendum – ARNG) * Enlistment Bonus Control Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065409C070421

    Original file (2001065409C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) enlistment addendum be honored as written. On 18 May 2001 the office of the Chief, Army Reserve, denied her request for exception to policy and informed the applicant she could either remain in the unit without the increased SLRP, she could request discharge, or she could petition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509605C070209

    Original file (9509605C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: She was entitled to the SLRP based on her reenlistment and, therefore, retention personnel should have included the SLRP addendum in her reenlistment contract. Entitlement to the SLRP will stop if the soldier contracted for an MOS authorized by Department of the Army for SLRP entitlement and moves to an ineligible MOS, or is reclassified. Obviously, the applicant did not need any additional incentives to reenlist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003873

    Original file (20140003873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. The State Incentive Manager requested an ETP to pay the incentive on 17 April 2013, but the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied the request because paying the incentive violated Army National Guard (ARNG) Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06: * She accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position on 16 February 2010 * The SRIP addendum was missing the applicant's and the witnessing officer's signature dates * The SLRP addendum was also dated 3 May 2009 which was after the her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015219

    Original file (20130015219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to a $15,000 enlistment bonus and eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). The applicant provides: * memorandum from Headquarters, CAARNG, Sacramento, CA, subject: Notification of Termination/Recoupment of Incentives, dated 13 April 2012 * 2 memoranda from National Guard Bureau (NGB), U.S. Property and Fiscal Office for California, Mather, CA, subject: Incentive Notice of Indebtedness, dated 27 June 2012...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005249

    Original file (20130005249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides an ETP request, dated 2 December 2009, she submitted to her immediate commander for payment of the SLRP benefit wherein she stated that before enlisting in September 2006 she was told 96B was a critical MOS that would come with the MGIB, SLRP, and an enlistment bonus. The applicant’s USAR unit previously submitted a request for the applicant to receive the SLRP incentive and it was denied by the approving authority based on the fact that she was not awarded the SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060504C070421

    Original file (2001060504C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In that response the USARC reiterated that the applicant’s MOS was not eligible for the $20,000 SLRP, and added that the regulation which governs the SLRP limits the amount of SLRP a reservist can receive during his or her career as the amount to which he or she While not a matter of record, it would appear likely that any student loans which existed at the time of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008403

    Original file (20140008403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) * Guard Annex (Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement – ARNG – Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment) * Annex S to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) – SLRP Addendum – ARNG of the United States * National Student Loan Data System Financial Aid Review * DD Form 2475 (Department of Defense Educational Loan...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014088

    Original file (20140014088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the $50,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that she contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS/GAARNG (RFP in an ING status), on 30 June 2011, for a period of 1 year in MOS 12K and her enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The evidence of record also shows the NGB decision to deny the applicant's SLRP was based on her...