Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065409C070421
Original file (2001065409C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 4 June 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065409

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) enlistment addendum be honored as written.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that since a representative of the Army who was empowered to enter into a legally binding contract with her executed a $20,000.00 SLRP addendum with her, the Army is bound by the terms of that contract.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 20 February 1988 she enlisted in the Army Reserve for assignment to a Troop Program Unit (TPU). In conjunction with that enlistment she executed a $10,000.00 SLRP addendum.

She was promoted to sergeant, completed her enlistment, and was honorably discharged at the expiration of her term of service on 5 March 1996.

She enlisted in the Army Reserve for 6 years as prior service on 16 May 1999. In conjunction with that enlistment she executed a $20,000.00 SLRP addendum.

On 31 July 2000 the applicant was notified that her original $10,000.00 SLRP contract could not be increased. The applicant sent a letter contesting that ruling on 3 November 2000. The servicing Finance and Accounting Office (F&AO) responded on 30 November 2000, reiterating that a $10,000.00 SLRP cannot be increased.

On 26 January 2001 the applicant requested an exception to policy to increase her $10,000.00 SLRP to a $20,000.00 SLRP.

On 18 May 2001 the office of the Chief, Army Reserve, denied her request for exception to policy and informed the applicant she could either remain in the unit without the increased SLRP, she could request discharge, or she could petition this Board.

On the date the applicant submitted her application, she remained assigned to her TPU, serving in pay grade E-6.

The SLRP provides for the repayment by the Government of a designated portion of any outstanding student loan(s) secured after 1 October 1975. The loan amount to be repaid is 15 percent of the original balance of the loan plus accrued interest not paid by the Department of Education, or $500.00 plus the accrued interest not paid by the Department of the Education, whichever is greater. Payments will be made for each year of satisfactory service in the Selected Reserve. The maximum amount of loans against which the 15 percent is computed will not exceed $10,000. This equates to a maximum annual repayment of $1,500 plus interest. If the amount set for repayment is less than $500.00, then $500.00 becomes the calculated amount for repayment that year. To be eligible for the SLRP incentive, a person must contractually obligate himself or herself to serve satisfactorily, must serve in a reserve unit for a full term of the contractual agreement and must further obligate himself or herself to continue to serve in the same component and the same MOS unless excused for the convenience of the Government. Entitlement to the SLRP will stop if the soldier is separated from his or her unit.  Each complete satisfactory year of service performed under this SLRP agreement establishes an anniversary date. Any qualifying loan which is at least a year old may then be paid in accordance with the terms of this educational enlistment incentive. In other words, a reservist may not submit any loan for repayment until he or she has completed a year of his or her enlistment. The Government will not reimburse a soldier if he or she pays off a student loan. The Government will only pay the lending institution.

Army Regulation 135-7, paragraph 5.1-10, states, in effect, that effective 1 January 1992 when a reservist who executed a SLRP addendum during a previous enlistment enlists in the USAR for assignment to a TPU as prior service, he or she may only receive the amount of SLRP which remained unused from the prior SLRP addendum. The reservist cannot execute a SLRP addendum for a higher amount than the original SLRP addendum.

The Comptroller General of the United States has ruled in similar cases that although a service member may have been misinformed about his entitlements, the Government is not liable for erroneous actions of its officers, agents, or employees in the performance of their official duties.

Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 9-10, states that an enlistment is defective when a soldier receives a written enlistment or reenlistment commitment from recruiting or retention personnel which cannot be fulfilled by the military. This paragraph provides the authority to discharge reservists who have defective enlistments.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was not authorized to execute a SLRP contract for an amount which exceeded the amount of her original SLRP addendum. As such, her enlistment was defective.

2. Contrary to the applicant’s contention, the Army is not bound by the erroneous actions of its officers, agents, or employees in the performance of their official duties. To the contrary, Army regulations specify that a soldier who is given an enlistment incentive which cannot be honored may request discharge. Receiving the incentive is not one of the soldier’s options when a defective enlistment occurs.

3. The applicant was notified that she was limited to her original $10,000.00 SLRP immediately after she submitted her first request for payment of her student loans. As such, she knew her enlistment was defective in a timely fashion.

4. To grant the applicant’s request would be giving her a benefit not provided to other soldiers.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__aao ___ ____rks _ ___jlp___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065409
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2020604
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.07
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082445C070215

    Original file (2002082445C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072517C070403

    Original file (2002072517C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she initiated a SLRP contract for $20,000.00 as indicated in the DA Form 5261-4-R (Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum) she includes with her application. In a 30 May 2001 memorandum the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Office at Fort McCoy stated that although the applicant’s DA Form 5261-4-R was executed with an entitlement of $20,000, she was only eligible for a $10,000 entitlement and payments would be made for that entitlement. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005386

    Original file (20110005386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that all of his student loans are authorized for repayment under the Army Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). The applicant provides copies of: * Annex L to his DD Form 4 (SLRP Addendum – ARNG of the United States) * Letter from Citibank, dated 7 August 2006, informing him of his approved loan for $9,000.00 * Citibank Disclosure Statement, dated 29 August 2006, informing him of his loan payment total (principal and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000883C070206

    Original file (20050000883C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her US Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract be honored and that she be paid $10,000 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). During the enlistment process, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding), acknowledging she was enlisting for MOS 73C (Finance Specialist) and that the MOS qualified for a $10,000 loan repayment under the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000883C070206

    Original file (20050000883C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her US Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract be honored and that she be paid $10,000 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). During the enlistment process, the applicant signed a DA Form 3286-67 (Statement of Understanding), acknowledging she was enlisting for MOS 73C (Finance Specialist) and that the MOS qualified for a $10,000 loan repayment under the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509605C070209

    Original file (9509605C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: She was entitled to the SLRP based on her reenlistment and, therefore, retention personnel should have included the SLRP addendum in her reenlistment contract. Entitlement to the SLRP will stop if the soldier contracted for an MOS authorized by Department of the Army for SLRP entitlement and moves to an ineligible MOS, or is reclassified. Obviously, the applicant did not need any additional incentives to reenlist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605309C070209

    Original file (9605309C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that she executed a Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) addendum to her enlistment contract which was properly validated by her recruiter and that her student loans be paid for in accordance with the terms of that addendum. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: She enlisted in the Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 August 1986 for 6 years in pay grade E-3. The applicant was never completed a properly countersigned SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002338

    Original file (20130002338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provided a copy of Annex A of her enlistment contract, dated 9 February 1993, which shows she acknowledged she agreed to the following: * serve 6 years as an assigned member of a troop program unit and 2 years in the Individual Ready Reserve * training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91M (Hospital Food Service Specialist) * a $10,000.00 SLRP entitlement 4. In addition, Line 7 of Table 9-4 requires the guidance counselor to verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019966

    Original file (20130019966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was approved for the contracted amount of $10,000.00 in accordance with the terms of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Addendum. The applicant states: * on 20 September 2001, he enlisted in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) and signed an SLRP Addendum * he attended Officer Candidate School (OCS) and on 21 August 2004 he accepted a commission as an officer * although he was eligible for the SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007599

    Original file (20090007599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to authorize payment of the outstanding balance of his student loans which were not originally paid off by the military under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). Records available to the Board indicate the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 11 June 1981 for a period of 6 years. The applicant's argument that he has a remaining balance of approximately $6,600.00 in outstanding student loans is not supported by any evidence of record or...