Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507539C070209
Original file (9507539C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment.  In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which preclude reenlistment.  He also  states, in effect, that he was honorably discharged from service and he would like to re-enter the Armed Forces in  an active duty or reserve status.

3.  He was born on 28 October 1968.  He completed 12 years of formal education.  On 24 February 1987, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 71D10 (Legal Specialist).  On 5 December 1989, the applicant was honorably discharged, after serving 1 year, 9 months and 
12 days of creditable active service.  On 6 December 1989, the applicant immediately reenlisted for 4 years.  

4.  On 20 June 1991, while attending the Primary Leadership Course, the applicant was selected to the Commandant’s List for exceeding all course standards in the areas of physical fitness training, drill and ceremonies, land navigation and map reading.  On 1 September 1992, the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-5.  

5.  On 13 December 1993, the applicant was honorably discharged in pay grade E-5 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, (Expiration term of service). He had completed 6 years, 9 months and 20 days of honorable military service.  He was awarded the Army Achievement Medal (4th Award), the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award), the National Defense Service Medal, the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon, the Army Service Ribbon and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

6.  On 27 March 1997, the Retention Management Division at PERSCOM, in a telephonic comment to the Board, advised that it had determined that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was erroneously annotated with reenlistment code of RE-3.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was honorably discharged and was assigned a reentry code.  However, the reentry code is not commensurate with the applicant's overall character of military service.

2.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s record which indicates that he had any disqualifications which would have established the basis for him receiving the reentry code of RE-3.  This is supported by a telephonic opinion provided by the Retention Management Division at PERSCOM.

3.  It is the opinion of this Board, that the applicant's DD Form 214 was erroneously annotated with an reentry code RE-3.
4.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, and in the light of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing a DD Form 215 (Corrections to the DD Form 214), Certificate of Release or Discharge by showing that the individual concerned was honorably discharged on 13 December 1993, and received a reentry code of RE-1.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510004C070209

    Original file (9510004C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. He had completed 4 years of honorable military service. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing a DD Form 215 (Corrections to the DD Form 214), Certificate of Release or Discharge by showing that the individual concerned was honorably discharged on 8 August 1993, and received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 951100C070209

    Original file (951100C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. He had completed 4 years of honorable military service. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was honorably discharged and assigned a reenlistment coded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606833C070209

    Original file (9606833C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. On 29 July 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged in pay grade E-5 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, (Expiration term of service). Although this reentry code RE-3 does not qualified him for continued Army service this reentry code is waivable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609758C070209

    Original file (9609758C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given a separation code of “KGH, and a reentry code of “3.” He had completed a total of 9 years, 1 month, and 26 days active military service, and 2 years, 8 months, and 21 days inactive military service. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment. Based on the applicant’s selection of Option 2 when he was notified of the DA bar to reenlistment, he should have been involuntarily discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511399C070209

    Original file (9511399C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicates that he was honorably discharged on 1 June 1993, in pay grade E-4, under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 (qualitative retention program), separation code “JCC,” with a reentry code of RE-4. He received $7,378.02 in separation pay. A staff member of the Board was informally advised by the authorities at the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, that, based on the applicant’s available records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510425C070209

    Original file (9510425C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 1993, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-4, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b (Locally imposed bar to reenlistment), with an honorable discharge. There is no evidence that the applicant has applied through his recruiter for a waiver. The Regulation requires that at the time of discharge reentry codes will be assigned based on the service records and the reason for the discharge; therefore, the applicant was assigned reentry eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018000

    Original file (20080018000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An upgrade of his reentry (RE) code from RE-4 to RE-3; and c. Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: (1) Item 7b (Home of Record) to show the entry “3xx, North 5th Street, Emmaus, Pennsylvania (PA) 18049; (2) Item 11 (Primary Specialty) to show he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 31P3P (Satellite Communications Maintenance Team Chief) for 11 years, 1 month, and 22 days; in MOS 18E4LTH (Special Forces Communications...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012091

    Original file (20110012091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) awarded him in January 1999 should be added to item 13 of his DD Form 214; b. the following entries should be added to item 14 of his DD Form 214: * Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Training (December 1997) * Advanced Techniques in Evidence and Property Management (April 1997) * Interview and Interrogations (August 1997) * Military Police Advanced Noncommissioned Officer's Course (ANCOC) (June 1996) * Managing Criminal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086730C070212

    Original file (2003086730C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bar was reviewed after 6 months and was subsequently removed. Although the applicant's request to the NCOES Reinstatement Panel is not present for review by the Board. NOTE: In the event that the applicant has not been awarded his third and subsequent awards of the GCM as directed by Board proceedings AR2002071043 dated 24 October 2002, the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA), St. Louis will be requested to accomplish the action as directed by the Board in that case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509703C070209

    Original file (9509703C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 April 1978, he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, for 3 years. On 24 January 1992, the commander indicated that he had presented the notification of the DA bar to reenlistment, explained the available options, and counseled the applicant on his rights, the provisions of the Enlisted Qualitative Early Separation Program, and Army Regulation 635-200. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.