Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9313400
Original file (9313400.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was entitled to Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP) for recruiting duties he performed from 24 March 1987 to 26 April 1988.
3. He states that although he was supposedly suspended from recruiting duties, he was assigned and performed duties as an assistant operations noncommissioned officer (NCO) during that time. In actuality, he claims that he had not been suspended from recruiting duties and, therefore, should be entitled to SDAP for the period in question.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 August 1975, served continuously as an automatic rifleman, personnel carrier driver, team leader, utilities equipment repairer, heat ventilation specialist, recruiter, recruiting station commander, recruiter training NCO, and recruiter assistant operations NCO, and was promoted to pay grade E-7. During the period in question, 24 March 1987 through 26 April 1988, he served as a recruiter training NCO and recruiter assistant operations NCO. He was honorably released from active duty on 26 April 1988 by reason of reduction in authorized strength, fiscal year 1988 early transition program.

5. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from United States Army Recruiting Command (USAREC). The USAREC stated that if the applicant was performing duties as a recruiter or as an assistant operations NCO, he would be eligible for SDAP as a staff recruiter with more than 12 months experience at the SD-3 level.

CONCLUSIONS :

1. The applicant’s records do not show that he was ever relieved from his assignment as a recruiter or as a assistant operations NCO, both positions which warrant SDAP.

2. In the absence of any record of the applicant being relieved from performing the duties associated with his duty positions, he is entitled to SDAP for the period in question.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION :

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was eligible for SDAP as the SD-3 level from 24 March 1987 to 26 April 1988.

2. That he be paid the SDAP for the period for which approved.

BOARD VOTE :

GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

DENY APPLICATION




                 
                  CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015394

    Original file (20100015394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 2 July 2007, and a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER), for the period 1 June - 2 October 2007, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant was also informed that a relief for cause NCOER was to be prepared by his rating officials.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014356

    Original file (20080014356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further stated that because his PCS was to a duty related school and he was still a part of the Defense Attaché Service (DAS), his SDAP was never questioned. The applicant’s claim that his record should be corrected to show the debt he incurred as a result of overpayment of SDAP was cancelled because he was assigned to a duty related training course of instruction for a follow on special duty assignment has been carefully considered. The evidence of record confirms the JMAS training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000304C070208

    Original file (20040000304C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. SFC D___ did not state that the applicant never had the documents.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010926C070206

    Original file (20050010926C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The U. S. Court of Federal Claims noted the applicant had been involuntarily separated from the Army but later reinstated after he successfully applied to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) (in Docket Number AR2000044795 dated 26 June 2001). In its 3 July 2003 Memorandum of Consideration, the ABCMR rejected his assertion, concluding that given receipt of SDAP is contingent on a member performing the special duty for which it is authorized, it would not be appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000582

    Original file (20120000582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to special duty assignment pay (SDAP). The applicant appears to be eligible to receive SDAP of $450.00 per month from 27 February 2010 until 29 April 2011. c. His eligibility for SDAP ended when he left his position on 29 April 2011. d. His request for SDAP is supported for the period stated above. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant was in an active status as a recruiter during the period 27...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9306347

    Original file (9306347.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 4th Endorsement, dated 8 April 1987, from the Chief, Personnel Division (a colonel), HQ, Department of the Army (DA), Office of the Chief, Army Reserve (OCAR), to the Commander, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, indicates that the request for involuntary release from the AGR program was disapproved; that, although the applicant was ineligible for further duty as a recruiter, per Army Regulation 601-1, documentation submitted did not substantiate release from active duty; that a review of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012177

    Original file (20130012177.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows that orders must be issued to award, change, terminate, and reinstate SDAP and that the Commander, HRC, is the order issuing authority; and b. paragraph 3-23 (Eligibility criteria for SDAP) that enlisted Soldiers are eligible to receive SDAP when they are qualified in one of the authorized SD assignments and shows that CMF 18, Army Special Operations Forces Soldiers are authorized SDAP-5. The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued orders for SDAP-5 and he was paid SDAP-5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015384

    Original file (20100015384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 October 2010, the applicant submitted additional information and requests additional relief in the form of: * Promotion to SFC/E-7 with entitlement to back pay and allowances * Removal of the Relief for Cause EER from his official records * A statement of non-rated time filed in his records and on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) in lieu of the Relief for Cause EER 5. On 9 August 1985, he completed the Army Recruiter Course and he was awarded MOS 00E and, on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001232

    Original file (20150001232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    FS K.S. She stated: a. FS K.S. She stated if FS K.S.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005235

    Original file (20110005235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period covering 1 October 2007 through 30 September 2008 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) and any appeal documentation be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The third copy of the contested NCOER, dated 3 March 2009, is a 6-month rated annual report for the period 1 October 2007 through 30 September 2008 which rated his performance as a recruiter within...