Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9207331
Original file (9207331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the Army void his honorable discharge of 9 June 1976 and place him on the physical disability retirement list (PDRL) as of that same date.

APPLICANT STATES : That his medical records clearly show that he was hospitalized for a “psychotic break” while on leave from Korea and this should have qualified him for a physical disability retirement.

COUNSEL CONTENDS : That because the VA gave the applicant a service-connected disability rating of 50% shortly after his separation, it is proof that he was similarly disabled while on active duty and should have been placed on the PDRL.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

He was born in Tel Aviv, Israel, on 23 October 1949 and grew up in a strict Jewish family in the stressful environment of the Middle East. In 1963/64, his family departed Israel and immigrated to the United States. On 1 August 1967, when he was 17 years old, he enlisted in the United States Marine Corps (USMC). After completing Marine boot camp training, he went to Vietnam where he served approximately 5 months before receiving superficial shrapnel wounds for which he was evacuated to the United States.

While recovering from his wounds, the applicant began to exhibit bizarre behavior by refusing to wear his uniform, obey orders, or salute officers. He was placed in the Psychiatric Ward of the Philadelphia Naval Hospital for evaluation. Diagnosed with an immature personality, a medical board found that his condition existed prior to his service (EPTS) in the USMC and recommended that he be discharged for unsuitability. He was found to be competent and was honorably discharged on 7 August 1968.

As a civilian, the applicant undertook educational pursuits and also got married. However, after a few unsatisfying years of civilian life, he began a series of unsuccessful attempts to join the Army. Realizing that the circumstances of his USMC service worked against his efforts to join the Army, the applicant withheld the information on his USMC service and finally enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 21 January 1974.

After completing all of his required military training, the applicant was assigned to a unit at Fort Knox, Kentucky, with duty as an infantryman. In February 1975, he applied for admission to Officer Candidate School (OCS) and was accepted and sent to Fort Benning, Georgia, for training. The applicant did not complete OCS and was relieved in his 14th week because of substandard scholastic and leadership scores. He was returned to enlisted duty in the rank of sergeant (E-5).

Reassigned to Korea, the applicant served as an infantryman in the 2nd Infantry Division from December 1975. While in Korea, he was observed by the Division psychiatrist for “progressively severe emotional problems.” In April 1976, he returned to the United States on ordinary leave. While on leave, he reported to Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, complaining of psychological problems. He was admitted, given a psychological evaluation on 5 May 1976, and diagnosed with chronic, undifferentiated, schizophrenia (EPTS).

The Army terminated the applicant’s tour of duty in Korea. He was given a medical evaluation board (MEB) that found him medically disqualified for retention and recommended his separation under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-40. Following a course of treatment, he was processed for a physical disability separation and honorably discharged on 9 June 1976 under the provisions of chapter 5, AR 635-40, Personnel Separations, Physical Evaluations for Retention, Retirement, or Separation. He had 2 years, 4 months, and 19 days of creditable active Army service and was erroneously credited with 2 years and 6 days of prior service in the USMC.

On 19 September 1978, the applicant received a special psychiatric evaluation from the VA which confirmed the Army’s diagnosis of chronic, undifferentiated schizophrenia. These evaluations continued every 2 years and reconfirmed the original diagnosis, the fact that the applicant was competent, and the need for the applicant to take tranquilizers (thorazine) on a daily basis. During an evaluation on 20 April 1988, the VA, noting the presence of combat stressors and significant childhood stressors [emphasis added], included the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

In the processing of this case, staff advisory opinions (COPIES ATTACHED) were obtained from the Office of The Surgeon General’s (OTSG) psychiatry consultant and the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA). The OTSG, while acknowledging that the applicant suffered from a psychiatric disturbance prior to his enlistment in the Army, opined that there was no proof that the disturbance was schizophrenia, and offered that it may have been PTSD from his USMC experience in Vietnam. The OTSG psychiatry consultant recommended the applicant be given a physical evaluation board.

The USAPDA advisory opinion took issue with the OTSG opinion, stating that PTSD did not even become a recognized diagnosis until 1980 and that “the ‘possibility’ of an incorrect diagnosis, opined some 20 years later, does not appear to . . . overcome the presumptions of regularity and proper administrative procedures accomplished upon the applicant’s separation in 1976.” The USAPDA stated that the essential determination to be made is not the label placed on the applicant’s illness, but whether he received due process at separation in 1976. They concluded that the recommendation for separation processing in accordance with chapter 5, AR 635-40 was appropriate.

DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinions, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement

2. The applicant purposely withheld from his Army recruiter certain information about a well documented, pre-existing psychiatric condition. This information, had it been known, would have effectively disqualified him from enlistment (as it did each time he previously informed Army recruiters in his failed attempts to enlist). His failure to disclose the information constituted a fraud and resulted in a fraudulent enlistment. It is a principle of equity law that a person whose petition for relief is based upon a fraud has no right in equity. But for his fraudulent act, the applicant would not have been in a position to request a physical disability retirement, thus he is not entitled to the requested relief.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION : The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE :

GRANT

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

RVO EPV SAC DENY APPLICATION




                                                      Karl F. Schneider
                                                      Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011440

    Original file (20090011440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. He was found medically unfit and referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB). The applicant was discharged on 24 November 1966 by reason of physical disability under the provisions of paragraph 6, Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) with an SPN code of 278.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076652C070215

    Original file (2002076652C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An Army psychiatrist at the Fort Campbell US Army Hospital stipulated the applicant was medically qualified to return to duty, but also recommended he not be exposed to further combat and that he be restricted to assignments within the United States not involving basic combat training. On 27 January 1989, the VA found the applicant to be 100 percent disabled due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the processing of this case, a medical advisory opinion was obtained from the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019809

    Original file (20100019809.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant reported he might be AWOL, but it was because he was hospitalized at the Jackson VA Hospital for 30 days. The medical records were provided by the applicant's counsel to show the hospitalization locations, dates, diagnosis, and attending physicians. location date diagnosis/attending physician 130th Station Hospital Germany 1-14 May 1974 chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia (Dr. C____) Brooke Army Medical Center 16 May-5 June 1974 acute moderate undifferentiated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004366C070208

    Original file (20040004366C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that his disability did not exist prior to service (EPTS), that it was service aggravated, and, in effect, that he be granted a medical retirement with a 100 percent disability rating. Counsel further states that the PEB's finding that the applicant had a long history of hospitalizations for psychiatric disturbances and schizoid traits is not supported by the applicant's records. The applicant's civilian medical history indicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009889

    Original file (20070009889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Enlistment physical and VA records indicated no PTSD from USMC service. The PEB found the applicant physically unfit and recommended a rating of 0 percent and separation, without disability benefits. The PEB stated that his Army enlistment physical and VA records indicated no PTSD from USMC service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011997

    Original file (20070011997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his VA Rating Decision, dated 26 June 2007, which shows that he was granted a 100 percent service connected disability, for, in effect, schizophrenia. Paragraph 7-20, PEB processing, states, in pertinent part, that if the PEB recommends removal from the TDRL, the PEB will forward to the Soldier a DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) and letter of explanation by certified mail, restricted delivery, return receipt requested. The Army must find that a service member...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060008394C071029

    Original file (AR20060008394C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, through his Representative in Congress, a memorandum dated 24 December 1997 discontinuing his PEB proceedings; a memorandum dated 22 April 1998 approving his request for withdrawal of his request for a formal hearing; a memorandum from the United States Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), Bethesda, Maryland, dated 24 June 1998, returning the applicant's PEB proceedings to the President, United States Army PEB; a memorandum dated 26 June 1998 discontinuing his...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00111

    Original file (PD2009-00111.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Navy Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and determined unfit for continued Naval service. He revealed his anxiety disorder on his commissioning physical but denied any symptoms at the time and the condition was considered resolved. The CI’s condition worsened over time and the VA increased his rating to 50% effective two years after he separated from the Navy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016930

    Original file (20120016930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Notwithstanding Dr. Snxxxxxss' conclusion that the applicant's condition did not fail retention standards, the USAPDA is of the opinion that this behavioral health diagnosis (now diagnosed as PTSD) was unfitting at the time the applicant was separated from the military (See VASRD 4.125 (b) (recognizing that a new diagnosis (i.e., PTSD) may represent the progression of a prior diagnosis)). The SRP finding, dated 10 September 2013, which had been forwarded to the applicant and is attached...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010511

    Original file (20140010511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP’s charge with respect to MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient...