ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608129C070209
If he had, he would have been enlisted in pay grade E-2 instead of E-1. Therefore, his advancement to pay grade E-2 should have been effective the date of his enlistment. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected: a. by showing that the individual concerned was advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 14 September 1993 with the same date of rank; and b. by showing that he was advanced to pay grade E-3 effective 14 September 1994 and that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9109333
The applicant was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 20 June 1990 under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, table 2-3, rule E. His DOR on the promotion instrument (DA Form 4187) is 23 January 1990. Paragraph 7-5 states that the DOR and effective date of promotion will be the same. The applicant’s effective date of advancement to pay grade E-3 should be 23 January 1990.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507760C070209
His enlistment contract specified that he was entitled to enlistment in pay grade of E-3 under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, table 2-3, rule E-3, based on his education. When the applicant received a recomputation for promotion to pay grade E-6 and was only awarded 50 promotion points for the credits listed on the same transcript. Had the applicant properly received credit (75 promotion points for 75 semester hours) for his civilian education, he would have received an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609631C070209
Paragraph 2-20f states, in effect, that an applicant who has successfully completed 60 or more classroom semester hours of an accredited college or university will be enlisted in pay grade E-3. The applicant should have been promoted to pay grade E-3 on 16 June 1995, the date she entered basic training, under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-20l. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicants records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021233
The DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) series of forms completed at the time of the applicant's enlistment in the USAR show she was authorized enlistment in pay grade E-3 in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), Table 2-3, Rule E. 6. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of her record to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 or to show she was appointed as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508110C070209
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he was enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 2 March 1994, in pay grade E-2. However, since there is no evidence of disciplinary actions and he completed 36 quarter hours during the 1993-1994 Winter and 1993-1994 Spring terms at the Mankato State University, the Board concludes that he should be advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 17 October 1994, the day that he completed 4 months service from the date...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023000
His enlistment contract shows he enlisted as a PFC/E-3 in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-18 (Enlistment pay grades for personnel without prior service). c. in paragraph 2-18a(16) when an applicant lacks documentation required for advanced promotion under this paragraph at time of enlistment, they may submit supporting documents to the personnel officer within 6 months of enlistment. As a result of the applicant's request to this Board, he has again gone out and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015475
The applicant states that he was never paid at the correct enlisted pay grade although his enlistment contract clearly shows he enlisted as a PFC. The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) and allied documents, dated 17 November 2006; a copy of his SGLV Form 8286 Servicemembers Group Life Insurance Certificate), dated 30 March 2007; a copy of Orders 229-1026, issued by the Joint Forces Headquarters, NYARNG, on 26 October...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012608
It appears the original education transcripts provided to the recruiter at the time of entry into the DEP were foreign and needed to undergo a foreign education evaluation for advancement determination purposes. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR DEP in pay grade E-1 on 1 October 2013, he was discharged from the USAR DEP, and he enlisted in the RA in pay grade E-1 on 13 January 2014. Since he completed 39 semester hours prior to his enlistment, his foreign...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013555
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he enlisted in the rank of specialist, pay grade E-4. He further states that he provided everything required by regulation and he still did not receive his advancement to pay grade E-4. There is no evidence showing that he provided any advanced education documents at the time of his enlistment.