Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8709019
Original file (8709019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his previous application to correct his records by upgrading his discharge, changing the reason for discharge or granting a medical discharge.

APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he suffered from a mental disorder while on active duty and was not properly diagnosed. That the continuous treatment from the VA is evidence of a disability or reason to upgrade his discharge.

NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum of consideration (MOC) prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 19 October 1988 (COPY ATTACHED).

The applicant’s contentions that his medical records prove he had a mental condition in the Army and the discharge was unjust constitutes new argument.

The applicant submits medical reports and evaluations from his civilian, military and VA doctors dating from March 1978 to 6 September 1995. Furthermore, he submits three letters from friends that state his health was fine before he entered the Army and after he was discharged he was different. Also that he is a stable young man, well mannered, and kind.

An advisory opinion obtained by the DARBA Medical advisor indicates the applicant’s military career was not interrupted by his medical status, therefore the applicant was not qualified for a medical separation. That upon examination of the medical records submitted, no information could refute the psychiatric evaluation which cleared him for separation.

DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, advisory opinions it is concluded:

1. The applicant was being processed for separation under conditions that could have led to discharge under other than honorable conditions and was not eligible for physical disability processing.

2. The applicant’s recent adjustments to civilian life and letters sent on his behalf are noted but these matters are not so exemplary nor exceptional as to demonstrate an injustice in the discharge.

3. Prior to reaching the determination that it was not in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file, the Board looked at the entire file. It was only after all other aspects had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of the records that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it undoubtedly would have recommended relief in spite of the failure to submit the application within the 3 year time limit. The Board has never denied an application simply because it was not submitted within the required time.

4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION : The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE :

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                                                      Loren G. Harrell
                                                      Director


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8809281

    Original file (8809281.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submits 1994 medical reports and evaluations from the Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital describing his alcohol and drug addictions and other mental and emotional problems. He was being processed for separation under conditions that could have led to discharge under other than honorable conditions and was not eligible for physical disability processing. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it undoubtedly would have recommended relief in spite of the failure to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8906279

    Original file (8906279.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect that there were mental (post traumatic stress disorder) and physical conditions at the time of discharge that should have been considered. NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 7 March 1990 (COPY ATTACHED).The applicant’s contention’s that the upgrade of his discharge is warranted because he was suffering from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016338

    Original file (20110016338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * the VA recently granted him a 50-percent service-connected disability for depressive disorder which began prior to his absent without leave (AWOL) period * this Board stated his completion of the primary leadership development course (PLDC) shows his mental state was not so severe that he was unable to perform his active duty assignments, but the Board did not consider he was only able to procure two medical documents * his mental illness was not properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8302910

    Original file (8302910.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 22 June 1983 (COPY ATTACHED).The contention that he was discharged under the wrong discharge authority, and that he had a heart condition and PTSD prior to his discharge and that his post service adjustment warrants review constitutes new argument. His 24 September 1962 report of medical examination...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054176C070420

    Original file (2001054176C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's previous consideration of the case (AR1999032774) on 1 August 2000. It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence (including but not limited to any facts or arguments as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9210632

    Original file (9210632.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records by showing that he was discharged for physical disability retirement. APPLICANT STATES : That he has been denied post service benefits because he was not on active duty or on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) for at least six months prior to discharge. Medical reports submitted by the applicant in the appeal show some treatment for a low back condition, however, they do not relate that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073942C070403

    Original file (2002073942C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submits VA medical records showing his treatment by that agency. VA medical records in February 2001 show that the applicant was evaluated by various medical personnel. At the time of his prior request to this Board in October 2001, the applicant made no request that his 30 percent disability rating be increased because of his left wrist condition, despite the evidence contained in the 2000 and 2001 VA medical documents indicating that he had problems with his left wrist and hand.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8300142

    Original file (8300142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS : Reconsideration of his previous request to correct his records by upgrading his discharge. The applicant’s military records show that on 22 January 1981, after the approval of his request for a chapter 10 discharge that he was counseled on the requirements for completion of a medical examination prior to his separation. Considering the entirety of the case, the Board has considered all of the applicant’s past and present contentions regarding his desire to have his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016924C070206

    Original file (20050016924C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant notes that he previously requested that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded and that he be medically discharged. In citing the basis for the deferral, the VA noted the applicant’s claim for disability for sleep apnea was received in February 2003 but his medical evidence during military service and since discharge was negative for the condition. Sleep apnea can cause serious problems if it isn't treated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052811C070420

    Original file (2001052811C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant includes a letter to the VA, continuing in this manner, and a letter to the President, stating that this Board denied his application, and stating that he had psychiatric problems. It also shows that the Army Discharge Review Board in 1992 and again in 1997 denied his request to upgrade his discharge.