ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000079C070208
He states that one of the statements was the “second statement” rendered by one of the enlisted women. She indicated that he inspected her room and then started to make small talk and asked her what she had on under the sheet and then began asking more personal questions. The evidence suggests that the investigation was conducted appropriately, that the investigating officer interviewed appropriate individuals, despite the applicant’s argument to the contrary, and that his findings and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065653C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711240
APPLICANT STATES : That his brother and another soldier (now deceased) were members of a bazooka team during an action in the vicinity of the Remagen Bridge in Germany, for which the other soldier was awarded the Silver Star. The Board believes that this man is the soldier who was awarded the Silver Star, and that he acted alone. The Board notes, still and all, that the one soldier was awarded the Silver Star for this action, that the regimental commander corresponded twice with the widow...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Feb 05 13_50_44 CST 2001
My defense counsel did not question During the (ADB) I was upset that the (ADB) any witness and myself doing (sic) the (ADB) about (0’s) behavior. Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) make this guarantee applicable to an ADB respondent by stating that such an individual is entitled to “qualified counsel,” and defining that term as “counsel qualified under Article 27(b) of the UCMJ.” Articles 3640200.7 and 3620200.lv of the United States v. Marshall, 45 Strickland, at 687. Article...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 1998-087appendices
Applicant! About 11:00 p.m., [the applicant and J.M.] [The applicant and J.M.]
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00841
ND02-00841 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020529, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I was told by navy legal office on Guam that an admin board was to be pick at random, but the Capt pick the board himself, I was also told that one member of my board was suppose to be from another command so as to be impartial this was not done everyone on my board was from my command. The possibility that one of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006794
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 1 August 1990, he was advised by his unit commander that action was being initiated to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a definite pattern of misconduct. The attached statement of his rights, which he acknowledged receiving on 2 August 1990, stated he had the right to: * consult with legal counsel * submit a request...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006171
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he filed an Article 138 against LTC S______ on 15 February 2006 which has never been concluded. On 5 December 2005, the garrison commander appointed an IO pursuant to AR 15-6 to conduct an informal investigation into allegations of misconduct regarding the applicant; specifically, to determine whether the applicant sexually harassed and/or acted inappropriately towards female Soldiers in the 3d ACR.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009778
The IO stated: a. (3) Counsel states that SPC R______, SSG S______ A________, SSG R___, SSG A______, and SGT A____, were all interviewed and none of them saw anything improper going on during the combatives training. g. SSG A________ R___, who states that he witnessed the applicant tell both SSG T_____ and SGT W______ that they looked professional on civilian clothes day.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004969C071029
The applicant provides active duty special work (ADSW) orders, dated 29 September 2001; his discharge packet; his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter); a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) and a corrected NGB Form 22; a DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States) with related letters from the Army Review Boards Agency; discharge orders, dated 8...