Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1900-1979 | 5801729b
Original file (5801729b.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his 20 December 1952 dishonorable discharge (DD) be upgraded to honorable (HD).  He states that he was the victim of racism and that his medical condition was not given proper weight at his trial by general court-martial.

3.  The applicant is a black man, born in Columbus, Ohio, on 12 January 1933.  He enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 8 August 1950.  His initial service was at Fort Knox, Kentucky.  While there, he was tried and convicted twice by summary courts-martial for being absent without leave for 4 days, and for being absent from his place of duty.  His conduct and efficiency ratings were unsatisfactory.

4.  On 2 January 1951, the applicant arrived in Korea and was assigned to the 15th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Infantry Division.  On 31 January 1951, he received fragment wounds in his left shoulder.  He was evacuated to Japan for medical treatment, then returned to his unit.  On 7 June 1951, he was wounded in the back and, once again, evacuated to Japan. He was marked fit for duty and sent back to Korea with an open wound in his back.  This created medical problems which caused his permanent evacuation in September 1951.  After spending 3 months in Japan, he was sent back to the United States in December 1951.

5.  Upon his return to the United States, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Knox.  While there, he received two more summary courts-martial for failure to report for Kitchen Police (KP) on 18 February 1952, and for disobeying an NCO on 2 May 1952.  At approximately 0530 hours, 3 June 1952, the Charge of Quarters (CQ) awakened the applicant for KP duty, but the applicant stated that he would not report for duty. The applicant got up and went to breakfast at 0610 hours.  Following his breakfast, the Mess Sergeant approached him and ordered him to report for KP duty.  He ignored the Mess Sergeant.  Shortly thereafter, the Company Commander found him in bed and ordered him to report for duty.  He refused.

6.  The applicant was tried by a general court-martial on 17 July 1952 for three specification of failure to obey a lawful order to report for KP duty.  He pleaded not guilty and, at trial, attempted to show that he was not rostered to perform KP duty, but was the victim of a whim of the first sergeant who verbally assigned him to duty at the last minute.  He also attempted to show that his medically documented war wounds gave him a physical profile which precluded him from duty involving heavy lifting and/or prolonged standing.  Trial counsel argued that, even if he was not on the KP duty roster, he still disobeyed the verbal orders of the CQ, the Mess Sergeant, and the Company Commander.  He also argued that KP duty did not violate the applicant’s profile against heavy lifting and/or prolonged standing.  Contrary to his plea, he was found guilty and sentenced to 5 years’ confinement and a DD.  On review, The Judge Advocate General reduced the period of confinement to 2 years.

7.  The Military Justice Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-209), provides, in pertinent part, that military correction boards may not disturb the finality of a conviction by court-martial.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant had a series of minor violations of military regulations for which he received four summary courts-martial.  These convictions were presented at his general court-martial as proof that he was an habitual offender and, most probably, influenced the court towards a harsher sentence.

2.  The applicant probably should never have been placed on KP duty because of his physical profile.  KP routinely involves the lifting of heavy items--sacks of food (potatoes), full trash cans, etc.--and interminably long period of prolonged standing.

3.  The applicant was guilty of disobeying a lawful order, however the command was disproportionately harsh in referring the matter to a general court-martial, and the court’s sentence was too harsh for the offense committed.

4.  While the Board cannot, by law, disturb the finality of a court-martial conviction, it can mitigate the punishment when deemed appropriate.  In this situation, the documented evidence, as well as the applicant's record, justifies mitigation.  It would, therefore, be unjust and inequitable, after more than 40 years, to continue to cause the applicant to suffer the stigma of a DD.

5.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, and in the interest of justice and equity, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as indicated below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1.  That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the DD of 20 December 1952, now held by the individual concerned, and issuing him a General Discharge Certificate, dated 20 December 1952, in lieu of the same.

2.  That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

  X        X       X   GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

ABCMR Proceedings (cont)                         AC58-01729B


4


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067351C070402

    Original file (2002067351C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was a young, 17-year old when he enlisted; that he served well in combat during the Korean War and received a head wound; that, upon reassignment from Korea to Japan, his personality changed and he started exhibiting bizarre behavior; and that, when he finally returned to the United States at 2 1/2 years of service and was given his first home leave, he went AWOL (absent without leave) for 5 or 6 months. Once the Department of the Air Force has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017308

    Original file (20070017308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with Army regulations, he is entitled to award of the Korean Service Medal with 2 Bronze Service Stars and the United Nations Service Medal. The applicant's service in Korea qualifies him for award of the Republic of Korea War Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 September 1950 through 29 February 1952, the National Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027534

    Original file (20100027534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 14 (Service Outside Continental United States) of his WD AGO 24A (Service Record) shows he left Japan on 12 July and arrived in Korea on 13 July 1950 and left Korea for Japan on 27 September 1950. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021326

    Original file (20140021326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army regulations clearly state the requirement for award of the Army of Occupation Medal is that one must serve in Japan for 30 consecutive days during the period 3 September 1945 to 27 April 1952. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. e. The Republic of Korea War Service Medal is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010971C070208

    Original file (20040010971C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Department of Defense assigned responsibility to the Department of the Air Force for distribution of the Korean War Service medal to eligible veterans or their surviving next of kin. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to this Board to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000349C070208

    Original file (20040000349C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    One daughter was an alcoholic who abandoned her children, three of whom were being raised by the applicant. At age 11, the applicant states he was placed in school in Warm Springs, Oregon. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020713

    Original file (20130020713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show: * he received shrapnel wounds to his right leg in item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) * award of the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge 2. Section 8 (Wounds Received Through Enemy Action) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) does not contain an entry. The criteria for award of the Purple Heart...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016115

    Original file (20080016115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 29 May 1951 in the Republic of Korea. The applicant provides a copy of a certificate indicating that General Orders Number 070, 7th Infantry Division, dated 24 April 1951, awarded him a Korean coin for gallantry; copies of clinical records, dated from 16 June 1952 through 12 August 1952, including Standard Form 539 (Abbreviated Clinical Record), Standard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021224

    Original file (20130021224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040008910C070208

    Original file (040008910C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division at St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Korean Service Medal with two bronze...