Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02201
Original file (PD-2014-02201.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-02201
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20150203
SEPARATION DATE: 20050609


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve E-6 (Master-at-Arms) medically separated for back pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “lumbar sprain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic lumbar strain” as unfitting, rated 20%. The CI appealed to the Formal PEB, which affirmed the PEB finding and rating and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please review all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Reconsideration IPEB – dated 20070427
 VA* – (~34 months Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Lumbar Strain 5243 20% Chronic Lumbar Strain 5237 10% 20100716
Radiculopathy, Left Lower Extremity 8520 10% 20100716
Radiculopathy, Right Lower Extremity 8520 10% 20100716
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 7
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20 101213 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low back pain (LBP). In early 2006, this CI fell and injured his back. Magnetic resonance imaging showed mild degenerative disc disease with disc bulges at L4-L5 and L5-S1, but no evidence of nerve root compression or spinal stenosis (narrowing). He was treated with multiple treatment modalities including physical therapy (PT) and epidural injections. However, the back pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB physical evaluation was performed by a neurologist in August 2006. The CI complained of constant pain in the lower back, right worse than left, with occasional radiation to the buttocks. He reported difficulty with sitting longer than 15 minutes, or standing longer than 30 minutes. On physical examination of the lower back, there was tenderness to palpation (TTP) of the right lumbar paraspinal muscles. The CI was able to heel walk and toe walk. His gait was normal and straight leg raise was negative. Neurological exam was normal. Range-of-motion (ROM) was decreased, but actual measurements were not done at that time. In March 2007, thoracolumbar ROM was measured by PT, and those measurements are summarized in the chart below.

The CI was medically separated from service on 21 September 2007. Thirty-four months later, in July 2010, he had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. He was working full-time as a police officer, and reported that his back pain was constant. On examination, his posture and lumbar spine curvature were normal. There were no spasms, and no TTP. Neurological exam was normal. Thoracolumbar ROM was normal, but there was pain with motion. The ROM evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its recommendation are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)
 PT ~ 6 mos . Pre-Sep
(20070323)
 VA C&P ~ 34 mos . Post-Sep
(20100716)
Flexion (90 Normal)
 40 90
Combined (240)
 110 240
Comment
 Pain with motion Pain with motion
§4.71a Rating
 20 % 10 % *
*10% rating based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss) , and §4.59 (Painful motion)
The Board carefully reviewed all available evidence, and directed attention to its rating recommendation. The Board noted the disparity in the ROM exams documented above. The March 2007 ROM measurements were closer to the DOS, and therefore carried greater probative value. At that exam, thoracolumbar forward flexion was 40 degrees, and combined thoracolumbar ROM was 110 degrees. IAW the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a, a 20% rating is warranted when thoracolumbar forward flexion is greater than 30 degrees, but not greater than 60 degrees. A 20% rating is also warranted when combined thoracolumbar ROM is not greater than 120 degrees.

A fter a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a disability rating of 20% was appropriate. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other codes which could be applied to the LBP condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, since the treatment record did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling spine condition which would justify a rating higher than 20%. The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. After reviewing all the information in the record, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically significant neuropathy that interfered with performance of military duties. The CI had neurological symptoms, but there was no performance-based evidence that the neurological condition impacted his military duties. Therefore, the Board concluded that there was no unfitting radiculopathy present at separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the chronic back pain condition (“Chronic lumbar strain, following back injury”).


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140513, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review




 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
 Subj:    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION
Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 10 Jun 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual's records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy' s Physical Evaluation Board:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN








XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)




Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01927

    Original file (PD-2013-01927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050524 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00082

    Original file (PD-2014-00082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain due to thoracolumbar scoliosis without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting,rated 10%, citingapplication of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain Due to Thoracolumbar Scoliosis5299-523710%Myofascial Back-Syndrome Secondary to Thoracolumbar Scoliosis with Degenerative Joint Disease(DJD) of the Thoracic Spine5003-523710%20070319Other MEB/PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01983

    Original file (PD-2013-01983.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain523710%Degenerative Disc Disease 5242-524320%20051123Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 10%RATING: 70% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02651

    Original file (PD-2013-02651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracolumbar back pain due to scoliosis” as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02692

    Original file (PD-2014-02692.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Therefore, based on a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, a 20% disability rating was appropriate for the CI’s chronic back condition. BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00297

    Original file (PD2012-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20060126 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200297 BOARD DATE: 20121102 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a 1LT/O-2 (00E, Student Officer) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. 2...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01283

    Original file (PD2012 01283.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low back pain (LBP) and right foot pain conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. -- 210No mention of painful motionPain with motion0% 10%The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.After consideration of the two back examinations noted above, it was determined that both exams had probative value, since both were conducted in a thorough manner, and were performed within 6 months of separation. Right Foot Pain .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01324

    Original file (PD-2013-01324.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate Service disability rating for each of the pain problems. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a separation disability rating of 10% was appropriate for the LBP condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01560

    Original file (PD-2012-01560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was then medically separated with a disability rating of 0%. The PEB rated it 0%, and the VA assigned a disability rating of 20%. Physical Disability Board of Review