VA - (~2 Mos. Post-Separation) | |||||||
Code | Rating | Condition | Code | Rating | Exam | ||
Lumbosacral Strain | 5237 | 10% | Lumbar Spine Strain | 5237 | 20% | 20080206 | |
Other x8 (Not in Scope) | 20080206 | ||||||
Combined: 100% |
Thoracolumbar ROM(Degrees) | Ortho ~ 9.5 Mo s . Pre-Sep | PT ~6.5 Mo s . Pre-Sep | VA C&P ~ 2 Mo s . Post-Sep |
Flexion (90 Normal) | “N ormal ” | 20 | 50 |
Combined (240) | - | 120 | 200 |
Comment | Pos. painful motion & tenderness; No spasm; Normal gait, strength & reflexes | Inclinometer used; Pos. painful motion & tenderness; No spasm, guarding, or abnormal spinal contour; Normal gait | Goniometer used; Pos. painful motion & tenderness; No spasm; Normal gait &posture ; Neg. straight leg raise bilaterally; Pos. Deluca criteria |
§4.71a Rating | 10% | 40% | 20% |
UNFITTING CONDITION | VASRD CODE | RATING |
Lumbosacral Strain | 5237 | 20% |
RATING | 20% |
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00458
The lumbar spine condition, characterized as “myofascial low back pain (LBP) syndrome” and “degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition“moderate obstructive sleep apnea,” as medically acceptable,IAW AR 40-501. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01471
The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation. When he continued to experience the mid-lower back pain he was referred into the DES. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00336
The VARD dated 12 April 2007, 6 months after separation, did not grant service-connection, specifically citing“service connection for chronic back pain is denied because the medical evidence of record fails to show that this disability has been clinically diagnosed” and there were no ROM measurements documented.Approximately 8 years later, the next VARD granted service-connection and rated the “mechanical back pain” as 10% disabling specifically citing, “…§4.59 allows consideration of...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02043
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Spinal contour was normal, but posture was “slightly abnormal, flexed forward at the lumbosacral spine region.” Lower extremity muscle strength was normal.An examination the following day recorded some muscle spasm of...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01434
Chronic Low Back Pain Condition . The evidence documents that the CI did have an intervertebral disc syndrome that could be rated based on incapacitating episodes; however, the evidence did not contain any documented episodes of incapacitation that met the VASRD definition, “For purposes of evaluations under diagnostic code 5243, an incapacitating episode is a period of acute signs and symptoms due to intervertebral disc syndrome that requires bed rest prescribed by a physician and...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02345
The back condition and anemia, characterized as “mechanical low back pain (LBP)” and “anemia,” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. A neurosurgical examination on 23 August 2004 (10 months prior to separation) showed normal spine contour and normal gait. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00130
The CI contention for radiculopathy with L4-L5 will be addressed in the review of the rating of the unfitting low back pain condition (as referenced on PEB proceedings document). At the MEB exam 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported, “back pain from C 130 hard landing.” The MEB physical exam noted mild tenderness at LS junction to moderate pressure and no overt spasm. The values reported were derived from the subjective pain threshold with motion and the rating decision stated, “an...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00261
Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Herniated Disc L4-5 with DDD524320%Lumbar Spine Strain523740%20070829Sciatic Nerve with L1-4 RL Radiculopathy852020%20070829Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x920070829 Combined: 20%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20071023 (most proximate to date of separation) invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00740
CI CONTENTION : “Attached with this application, you will find VA Rating Decision Dated 8 June 2005 detailing Mr. R-- receiving a VA disability percentage of 20% for his chronic cervical muscle spasms. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain523710%Low Back Pain w/ Limited Motion523740%20050421Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain523710%Chronic Cervical Muscle Spasms w/ Limited Motion523720%20050421Other x 3 (Not in Scope) Combined: 100%Combined:...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00870
The back pain condition, characterized as “chronic myofascial thoracic pain syndrome,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting medical standards IAW AFI 48-123. X-rays and computer aided tomograms of the spine done as part of his work up were normal without evidence of fracture or disc problem.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 24 May 2007,7 months prior to separation,described in the physical examination that the CI demonstrated “…normal gait and station,...