Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01880
Original file (PD-2014-01880.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01880
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141217
SEPARATION DATE: 20040220


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard E-4 (Signal Support System Specialist) medically separated for a right wrist condition. The wrist condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right wrist condition, characterized as “right wrist status post extensor carpi ulnaris tendon debridement and repair” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “pain right wrist post debridement extensor carpi ulnaris tendon” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI non-concurred with the PEB, but chose not to submit a written appeal. He was then medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “All conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20031105
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Pain Right Wrist Post Debridement Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tendon 5099-5003 0% Traumatic Arthritis Right Wrist Status Post Tendon Repair 5010-5215 10% 20040421
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 3
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40914 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Pain Right Wrist Post Debridement Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tendon Condition. The CI sustained a right wrist injury in February 2002. Radiographic evaluation on 11 April 2002 demonstrated cystic changes at the ulnar bone and two of the small wrist bones with evidence of early arthritis. The CI continued to present with right wrist pain and underwent an extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon debridement on 18 February 2003. Despite surgical and conservative management the CI continued to report right wrist pain.

At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination the CI reported that he worked at a desk on a computer all day. He described difficulty using a mouse, twisting open a jar, lifting more than 10 pounds and doing push-ups. The examiner noted a mildly hypertrophic right wrist scar, tenderness directly over the ECU to the head of the ulnar and tenderness at dorsal ulnar border of the forearm. There was no swelling or redness in the wrist or forearm. A diagnosis of right wrist pain status post extensor carpi ulnaris tendon debridement and repair was rendered.

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed 2 months after separation, the CI reported recurrent right wrist pain, decreased grip, and decreased ability to strenuously dorsiflex the wrist. He reported Percocet use for pain about twice a week, if the pain interfered with his sleep. The physical examination was significant for a nontender scar on the ulnar aspect of the wrist and limitation of motion in most planes. Radiographic evaluations documented evidence of prior trauma involving the ulnar styloid process, demineralization of bones and mild degenerative changes above the wrist.

The goniometric range-of-motion evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.


Right Wrist ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 5 Mo. Pre-Sep
 O T ~ 7 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~ 2 Mo. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (70 Normal) 60 55 30
Palmar Flexion (80) 60 60 45
Ulnar Deviation (45) 30 15 15
Radial Deviation (20) 10 # 20
Comment Limitation of motion with tenderness. Decreased grip strength, pain limitation of motion ulnar deviation Percocet for pain 2X/week, painful motion, but no additional decrease with repetition or pain . Degenerative changes on x-ray
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 % 10 %

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the pain right wrist post debridement extensor carpi ulnaris tendon condition as unfitting and assigned a 0% disability rating coded analogous to degenerative arthritis, 5009-5003; with cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The VA rated the right wrist pain condition at 10%; coded 5010 (traumatic arthritis)-5215 (wrist limitation of motion). The NARSUM and VA examinations documented right wrist limitation of motion and tenderness to palpation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the pain right wrist post debridement extensor carpi ulnaris tendon condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating pain right wrist post debridement extensor carpi ulnaris tendon was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy/instruction by the Board. In the matter of the pain right wrist post debridement extensor carpi ulnaris tendon condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5215 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Pain right wrist post debridement extensor carpi ulnaris tendon 5299-5215 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140421, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009956 (PD201401880)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00149

    Original file (PD2009-00149.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Using an evaluation done three months after separation from the Marines, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability at a combined 30% with 5308 Left hand repair at 20% and 5024-5215 left wrist volar and dorsal blast defects at 10%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board used the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD) as the most favorable basis for rating. The Group VII injury is characterized as moderately severe IAW with VASRD paragraph 4.56 because...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02055

    Original file (PD-2013-02055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “chronic pain, right wrist”as unfitting, rated 10%referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The examiner’s prognosis was “fair” and rated the CI’s pain as “slight” and “frequent.”At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed on 21 July 2004 (3 months after separation), the CI reported constant, but non-incapacitating right wrist pain. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00157

    Original file (PD 2014 00157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rating the condition as “moderate” would result in a 10% rating, no different from the ratings posted by the PEB and VA, so the Board considered whether the condition could be rated as “moderately severe” at 20%. During the 5 years prior to separation, the CI noted increasing pain, stiffness, decreased ROM and increasing difficulty performing required duties. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00275

    Original file (PD2009-00275.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Two left wrist range of motion measurements substantially agree with "dorsiflexion to volar flexion are of 3 to 5 degrees at the most" and active range of motion measurements of 20051215 using a goniometer demonstrated left wrist extension 0 to 1 degree, flexion 0 to 2degrees. (Range of Motion: All measurements are in degrees; first number is start of ROM; second number is when pain begins within the ROM; third number (if used) is the end of AROM; Reference range of normal ROM is in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01977

    Original file (PD-2013-01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB examination cited a physical examination dated 22 February 2001 and noted continued hand swelling, near full flexion and extension of her fingers, but decreased wrist ROM with extension/flexion of 30 degrees/45 degrees (normal 70 degrees/80 degrees) with normal skin color, temperature and appearance and normal sensation.At physical therapy visitsfrom April 2001 to July 2001, after the NARSUM cited February examination wrist ROM was noted to be flexion/extension 75 degrees/65 degrees,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00353

    Original file (PD-2014-00353.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left wrist pain with excision of ganglion cyst two times,”as unfitting, rated at 0%,referencingapplication of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02362

    Original file (PD-2014-02362.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The “right wrist injury with continued pain”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00921

    Original file (PD 2012 00921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board next considered the VA chosen musculoskeletal codes for both the wrist 5215 (limitation of motion of the wrist) rated 10% for painful limitation of motion and the elbow 5213 (impairment of supination and pronation) rated 30% for pain limited motion analogous to the 5010 code (arthritis due to trauma) which is consistent with the VA exam at that time. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), §4.45(f) (the joints) and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00025

    Original file (PD-2012-00025.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Wrist Condition . The CI was evaluated by multiple orthopedic specialists and after the MEB examination underwent repeat surgery for the OCD on 3 February 2005.A PT note on 15 August 2005 noted the CI reported doing “pretty well,” with improved ability to walk and decreased pain.At the MEB examinationthe CI reported right ankle pain. At a VA outpatient physical medicine evaluation on 9 November 2005, 2 months after separation, the CI reported right ankle pain despite two surgeries...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00095

    Original file (PD-2014-00095.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The tip of the left index finger was amputated and the little finger was shortened in comparison. ROM was decreased in the first three fingers; excluding the thumb and little finger. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling...