Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01788
Original file (PD-2014-01788.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2014-01788
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141203
SEPARATION DATE: 20060525


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) SGT/E-5 (42A20/Administration Specialist) medically separated for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and bilateral snapping hip syndrome. These conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent P3/L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bowel and hip conditions, characterized as “irritable bowel syndrome [IBS] with chronic pain and bloating” and “snapping hip syndrome,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the IBS and hip conditions as unfitting, rated 0% and ---% respectively, stating the hip condition was related to an Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (congenital connective tissue disorder) diagnosis and existed prior to service (EPTS) with no evidence of permanent service aggravation. The remaining condition w as determined to be not unfitting. The CI non-concurred with the IPEB findings, hence, she requested and w a s granted a Formal PEB (FPEB) . The FPEB reviewed the IPEB proceedings , adjudicating the IBS condition unfitting, rated at 10%, as well as reaffirming the original IPEB’s findings for the bilateral hip condition s as EPTS . The CI non-concurred with the FPEB findings, the case file was forward to the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) for finial disposition determination , whom up held the FPEB’s findings and recommendations . The CI made no further appeals and medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting IBS and hip conditions are addressed below; the requested GERD condition, which was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB, is likewise addressed below; and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.



 RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20060329
 VA - (12 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
IBS 7319 10% IBS 7319 10% 20070228
Bilat Snapping Hip Syndrome (EPTS) 5099-5003 -- Snapping Hip Syndrome, Ehler Danlos, Left Hip 5253 0% 20070228
Bursitis Left Hip 5019 0% 20070228
Snapping Hip Syndrome, Ehler Danlos, Rt Hip 5253 0% 20070228
Bursitis Rt Hip 5019 0% 20070228
GERD Not Unfitting GERD 7307 NSC* 20070228
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 3 20070228
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70522 (most proximate to date of separation )
GERD corrected to 0% in VARD dated 20081216 .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IBS and GERD are both abdominal conditions that produce a common disability picture, and both conditions are discussed together. With regards to fitness the tenants of DODI 1332.38 are applicable, and for rating the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) sections §4.114 (schedule of ratings–digestive system) and §4.113 (coexisting abdominal conditions) were considered.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and GERD. The record indicated a history of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms including pain, reflux, abdominal cramping, diarrhea and constipation, vomiting and weight loss. She was hospitalized in Kuwait and evacuated from theater. The CI had recurrent and continued bouts of gastroenteritis, abdominal symptoms, and weight loss. Specialty testing including normal colonoscopy, CT scan without significant GI lesions, and abnormal upper GI testing (EGD, esophageal pressure testing) led to a diagnosis of GERD with a hiatal hernia. She underwent abdominal surgery (Nissen Fundoplication-stomach and hiatal hernia areas) in July 2005. Following surgery, the CI had continued abdominal and epigastric complaints on medications, and reported “up to five bowel movements a day” without blood. She was evaluated for diarrhea and bloating, difficulty swallowing (dysphagia), nausea and heartburn and was diagnosed with IBS.

At the narrative summary (NARSUM) and MEB exam, the CI reported weight loss of 35 pounds, stomach pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhea. The MEB physical exam noted very small well-healed puncture marks (from surgery), normal bowel sounds and no palpable tenderness. Weight was 96 pounds [109 pounds recorded on December 2004 fitness test] and height was 61 inches (pre-deployment weight was 125 pounds). She was described as an alert, well developed, trim … (individual) in no acute distress. There was no electrolyte or other lab test abnormalities. “Present Status” indicated the CI was in medical hold, doing “CQ 2 days a week. She says on a bad day she is in the bathroom all the time and no matter what day it is she tends to work or do things where there is a bathroom available.”

Repeat CT scan of the abdomen performed in January 2006 showed non-specific thickening of the duodenum (upper intestine at stomach outlet [akin to Barrett’s Esophagus]). Barium enema (VA ~March 2006) was normal, EGD noted inflammation of the esophagus and sigmoidoscopy was unremarkable with the examiner commenting that “there was positive stool, so I do not believe that the patient has been having chronic diarrhea.”

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (performed 12 months after separation), the CI reported symptoms of daily diarrhea, moderate dyspepsia and dysphagia (swallowing and heartburn) intermittent with remissions on medication, nausea and vomiting related to meals, and having missed 5 weeks of work during the prior 12 months. Weight was 125 pounds and there were no signs of significant weight loss or malnutrition.

A remote VA C&P exam in August 2008 (performed 27 months after separation), although the CI was 7 months pregnant, her pre-pregnancy symptoms of GERD including nausea that was treated with medication with positive results and taking IBS medication that was helpful with controlling her loose watery stools. The CI stated that she averaged 5 bowel movements per day and on severe days, she could have up to 10 bowel movements. “Her symptoms would be aggravated with stress or intake of any milk products.” Symptoms were noted to have worsened and the exam was rated by the VA at 30% effective July 2008.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the service and VA rated the IBS at 10% using disability code 7319 (irritable colon syndrome). The service found GERD as not unfitting, and the VA rated GERD with IBS (after initial not service-connected GERD rating was corrected). Any possible alternative GI rating using the GERD criteria (analogous to 7346 [Hernia hiatal]) would not rise above 10% without symptoms which were “productive of considerable impairment of health” which was not in evidence proximate to separation. Dual rating the IBS and the GERD conditions (if GERD rose to the level of being unfitting) is not permitted IAW VASRD §4.113 (Coexisting abdominal conditions). The Board therefore did not specifically deliberate if the IBS and GERD symptoms could be separated or if the GERD rose to the level of being separately unfitting as it would not alter any rating determination. The Board therefore focused on rating all digestive system disability. The 10% criteria for IBS is for “Moderate; frequent episodes of bowel disturbance with abdominal distress” while the 30% criteria is for “severe; diarrhea, or alternating diarrhea and constipation, with more or less constant abdominal distress.”

All of the exams proximate to separation described frequent episodes of diarrhea, bowel disturbance and abdominal distress which were adjudged as moderate and best aligned with the 10% rating criteria. The increased symptoms noted in the 2008 VA exam were adjudged post-separation worsening and not indicative of the CI’s disability level at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudications for the combined IBS and GERD conditions.

Snapping Hip Syndrome. The bilateral snapping hip syndrome with pain was found to be unfitting by the service and that was considered administratively final. The PEB disability description stated the CI had been “diagnosed with ‘Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome’ (hyper-flexibility at joints and elsewhere),” and the condition was not compensable due to EPTS without evidence of permanent service aggravation. The DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 14 December 2005, noted complaints of bilateral hip pain during mobilization training in August 2004, with increasing hip pain due to the weight of gear and weight loss. The CI was treated with medication for left hip “bursitis versus tendonitis” and had findings of tenderness with full range-of-motion (ROM) and discomfort with abduction of the left leg. A note later that month indicated the left hip condition was resolved and she was cleared for duty without restrictions. She passed her fitness test in December 2004. The NARSUM in December 2005 noted the CI complained that both hips bothered her and snapped which she attributed to weight loss. She had been on profile restriction to include her hips. “She says if she just walks it pops or if she bends over to grab something it pops. She says it got worse when she lost weight. The pain is not constant but the pressure feeling is constant.” Physical exam documented full ROM at the hips with hyper-flexibility. “The areas that tend to snap run right through the groin close to the pubic bone. It is only certain actions such as extension of the leg as well as certain flexion or external rotation that brings that on.”

At the VA C&P exam (performed 12 months after separation), the CI reported diagnoses of bilateral hip pain, "snapping tendons," and “Ehlers-Danlos.” The course was noted as intermittent with remissions, and on no treatment. The examiner stated “Mention of ‘Ehlers-Danlos’, though has none of the findings.” Exam documented a normal gait. Hips had “cracking” with full painless active and passive ROM bilaterally.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The record had no evidence of painful hips prior to 2004. There were scant treatment notes relating to the hip condition and there was no source treatment note or consult making a diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos os syndrome. Aside from hyper-flexibility at the hips, there was no evidence of skin or vascular findings or other joint hypermobility to fully support the diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Snapping hip syndrome bilaterally was well supported by the examinations and only the left hip had an additional diagnosis of bursitis which was considered resolved.

The Board considered that both snapping hip syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome are not typically associated with painful hips. Given the question of the actual diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos, and the late onset of painful hips in the face of increased activities and weight loss, the Board adjudged that the EPTS and lack of permanent aggravation as determined by the FPEB was not to the level as to create a virtual certainty (IAW DoDI 1332.38). The Board therefore adjudged that the hip conditions were compensable. There was scant evidence to separate the left hip from the right hip in terms of severity and both hips were considered reasonably unfitting. With regards to rating the hips, however, there was no objective evidence of painful motion for either hip and no periods of incapacitation due to the hips. Each hip if rated separately would warrant a 0% rating each, under the specific hip codes or general joint codes since VASRD §4.59 for painful motion were not adjudged to have been met. The Board considered that only the left hip had had a diagnosis of bursitis, but that each hip “snapping” could be analogized to 5024 (tenosynovitis) and considered as two major joints with pathology as code 5099-5024, rated 10%, using the criteria of code 5003. There were no incapacitating episodes for a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the bilateral hip condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the IBS (and GERD) condition and IAW VASRD §4.114, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. The GERD condition is considered within the IBS rating as discussed above. In the matter of the bilateral hip condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5024 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (with GERD) 7319 10%
Bilateral Snapping Hip Syndrome 5099-5024 10%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140414, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

        


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150008243 (PD201401788)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                  Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                  (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01293

    Original file (PD 2012 01293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Prior to Separation) – Effective 19990304 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam 20030429 TDRL Sep. Ileocolonic Crohn’s Disease w/ DJD 7399-7323 30% 10% Crohn’s Disease s/p ileocolonic resection 7323 30% 19990106 Inflammatory Arthritis Secondary to Crohn’s 5009-5002 20%* 19990106 and 20050301 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The VA GI exam, approximately 9 months prior to separation, noted that the CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01695

    Original file (PD2012 01695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded “esophageal reflux, nonulcerative dyspepsia (NUD), IBS, generalized anxiety disorder, and social phobia” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The PEB adjudicated the IBS (visceral hyperalgesia) condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). After due deliberation, the Board consensus was that the preponderance of the evidence with regard to the functional impairment of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01664

    Original file (PD2012 01664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions characterized as MEB diagnoses 1)“irritable bowel syndrome”, 2)“stress fracture left tibia and fibular stress reactions with pain”, and 3)“lower abdominal pain and low back pain”, were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicatedthe IBS, subsuming the 3rd MEB diagnosis,as unfitting, rated 10% and adjudicated tibial and fibular stress fractures, as unfitting, rated 0%with likely application of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00696

    Original file (PD2012 00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB’s 10% rating was based on a combined 7319 code (IBS) and analogous 7323 code (ulcerative colitis).The VA assigned a 60% ratingunder an analogous 7323 code for Crohn’s disease deemed to be “severe; with numerous attacks a year and malnutrition, the health only fair during remissions.” However, the VA additionally assigned 10% for separately rated irritable bowel...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00980

    Original file (PD-2014-00980.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “abdominal pain, due to irritable bowel syndrome, with gastritis” and “chronic subjective neck pain status post fusion, without neurologic abnormality, cervical range of motion limited by pain”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The report of medical examination (DD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01029

    Original file (PD2012-01029.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the IBS with chronic abdominal pain and diarrhea condition. Any abdominal disability from this condition was appropriately considered as a comprehensive abdominal condition under the CI’s unfitting 7319 abdominal condition discussed above. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00474

    Original file (PD2009-00474.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated with a 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Condition 1: Ulcerative Colitis It recommended separation from service with a rating of 10% for 7323 Ulcerative Colitis.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00901

    Original file (PD2012 00901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although symptoms did improve with medication, a P3 profile due to “sleeping disorder” was recorded on 2 November 2002, limiting the CI to “no driving vehicles, handling ammunition, firing weapons or performing duties requiring concentration or alertness.” The commander’s performance statement letter, dated 14 March 2003,records that the limitation of duties for narcolepsy prohibits assignments in which “sudden incapacitation would be dangerous to self or others.” The narrative summary...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00168

    Original file (PD2013 00168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flare ups were accompanied by abdominal pain in the right upper and lower quadrants, without identifiable triggers.On examination the CI was noted to be in no distress and the examination of the abdomen was non-tender. The Board undertook a careful review of the treatment records and noted the report of constant abdominal pain in every entry; however, clinical examinations noted no distress during physical exams, and examination of the abdomen was generally reported as normal. Service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00433

    Original file (PD2013 00433.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ratings for the unfitting gunshot wound of left posterior thigh group, the existed prior to service (EPTS) Ehlers-Danlos condition, and not unfitting conditions of multiple joint arthralgias and situational depression are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the...