Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01760
Original file (PD-2014-01760.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-01760
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS         BOARD DATE: 20141230
SEPARATION DATE: 20040831


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Administrative Clerk) medically separated for chondromalacia of the left knee. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was placed on limited duty and eventually referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The knee condition, characterized as “grade IV chondromalacia of the left knee” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB adjudicated “grade IV chondromalacia of the left knee” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please Consider All Conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040712
 VA - (14.5 Mos. Pre/Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Grade IV Chondromalacia of the Left Knee 5099-5003 10% Status Post Multiple Left Knee Arthroscopic Surgeries
with Residual Grade IV Chondromalacia /Internal
Derangement of the Left Knee(No Current Disability, or
an Actual Disabling Condition)		 5299-5014 0% 20050119
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other 4
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50321 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Grade IV Chondromalacia of the Left Knee. The CI reported pre-service left knee injury secondary to high school wrestling incident that was addressed by left knee lateral release surgery (patella) in March 2000. The narrative summary (NARSUM) recorded the CI sustained an additional injury to his left knee in October 2002 while marching. Radiographs in October 2002 demonstrated mild to moderate degenerative joint disease. The CI reported persistent pain, knee locking and popping, and denied instability. He underwent a second surgery in November 2002 with a partial debridement of his meniscus. The CI participated in physical therapy for approximately 9 months; however, continued with persistent pain, diagnosed as painful and inflammatory plica. In February 2003, he had the plica excised and was informed that he had significant cartilage damage and chrondromalacia in the knee. Having failed conservative measures and treatment of his pain, the CI was referred to the MEB. At the NARSUM examination dated 12 May 2004, approximately 3 months prior to separation, the CI noted he was unable to run for any significant amount of distance, could not complete his physical fitness test and had difficulty going on long walks with his family. He noted that when his children jumped on his knee, he had significant pain. Physical examination noted well-healed arthroscopy scar, and no evidence of inflammation. Left knee range-of-motion (ROM) recorded 130 degrees of flexion (145), and no evidence of instability, or neurovascular examination compromise. He had a significantly positive patellar grind.

The VARD noted a Compensation and Pension examination was conducted on 24 February 2005. The VARD recorded there was absence of pain at rest, absence of knee instability and there were occasional episodes of swelling and stiffness with prolonged activity that also increased pain. The VA opined the evidence cited by the examining physician did not show an actual disabling condition that would warrant a compensable evaluation.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the condition, but this did not bear on the rating. The PEB’s 10% determination coded analogously 5003, was consistent with clinical findings of slight limitation of motion, which was not compensable under any ROM codes. The Board agreed that a route to a higher rating under 5257 (knee, other impairment of) was not supported by the evidence. There was likewise no history of dislocated semilunar cartilage to warrant a rating under the 5258 code. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee chondromalacia condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chondromalacia of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140424, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
 Subj:    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION
Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 10 Jun 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual's records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy' s Physical Evaluation Board:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN








XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01933

    Original file (PD-2013-01933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to DVA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The examination on 5March 2009 (5 years after separation) showed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | Pd2009-00574

    Original file (Pd2009-00574.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a review of all of the findings, the Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending the left knee plica as an unfitting condition for separation rating. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXX’s records not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02254

    Original file (PD-2014-02254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition . However, although the CI reported that his knee frequently “gave out” at the C&P exam, there was no instability or laxity noted at the MEB or C&P exams and after separation rehab records...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01851

    Original file (PD 2012 01851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20030731 At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (a month prior to separation), the CI was walking with a brace and had a limp of the right leg. The Board determined that potential codes for the right knee condition could include 5014 (Osteomalacia) or 5024 (Tenosynovitis), but that these would be rated under the same criteria as either code 5003 or 5019 under §4.71a at 10%.The Board considered whether a higher combined rating might be indicated under any other codes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00996

    Original file (PD-2014-00996.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060508 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Examination on 6 October 2004 revealed the right knee range-of-motion (ROM) 120 degrees with medial joint line tenderness with “good quad tone.” In spite of physical therapy, the symptoms of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01177

    Original file (PD 2012 01177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI reported limited function of her left leg and that it was unstable with difficulty with stairs and walking. The Board considered the findings and noted that the ROM was normal on the VA examination. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02026

    Original file (PD-2013-02026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Knee Pain Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00013

    Original file (PD 2014 00013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2014-00013BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20140527 Bilateral Knee Pain w/Patellofemoral Chondromalacia s/p Bilateral Patellar Chondroplasty . Despite medications, her knee pain continued and she had an injection of the right knee on 23 October 2003.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01076

    Original file (PD2013 01076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION :“PEB rating of 20% w/disability discharge should have been at least 30% - VA Disability Rating of 30% upon review of military records.” Slight instability of the medial collateral ligament of the left and right knee was reported. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02209

    Original file (PD-2013-02209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered that the evidence in record supports that the CI had painful, limited ROM with imaging evidence of DJD following right knee injury and surgery, without significant instability. Left knee examination was the same as the right, except no effusion was present and physical therapy noted ROM of 0 degrees-130 degrees, without painful motion.At the VA C&P exam performed a week after separation the CI reported problems in the left knee due to compensation for his right knee. ...