Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01713
Original file (PD-2014-01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2014-01713
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141119
SEPARATION DATE: 20040305


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reservist on temporary tour of active duty SPC/E-4 (13B1O/Field Artillery Cannon Crewmember) medically separated for right knee condition. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Internal derangement of the right knee”, characterized as medically unacceptable, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “right anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) laxity” condition as unfitting, rated at 20%, with application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions 40%.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below. There are no additional conditions within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040206
 VA* - (2.7 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Anterior Cruciate Ligament Laxity 5257 20% Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear…Right Knee 5257-5261 10% 20040525
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 61023 (most proxima te to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee Condition. The CI originally injured his right knee while playing basketball in February 2003. He described a twisting type injury causing pain and feeling of instability. A magnetic resonance image performed in March 2003 revealed joint bruising, an incomplete meniscal tear and a complete ACL tear. Orthopedic examination performed in July 2003 noted full right knee range-of-motion (ROM), the absence of effusion, a “stable” leg with a positive anterior drawer test (a test possibly indicating a degree of instability). He continued to have pain especially with stair climbing. Surgical correction was recommended and was declined by the CI…stating fear of unsuccessful results. His primary treatment modality remained physical therapy.

At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination performed on 14 November 2003 (4 months prior to separation), the CI endorsed right knee pain aggravated by running, negotiating stairs, deep squatting or heavy lifting. The physical examination (PE) revealed the CI wearing a knee brace. His instability tests were positive and described as “slight laxity.” ROM was decreased without comment on the presence of painful motion. There was no effusion, edema or erythema present. The frequency and severity of pain was described as “occasional” and “minimal,” respectively. His diagnosis was internal derangement of the right knee. The commander’s statement indicated the CI’s impairment as negatively impacting the performance of his duties by preventing completion of MOS requirements. The permanent profile listed ACL deficient, right knee as the sole diagnosis.

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed on 25 May 2004; 6 weeks after separation, the CI reported minimally vague symptoms of intermittent (non-daily) aching right knee pain aggravated with kneeling, squatting, weight bearing or extreme temperature exposure and relieved with rest and pain meds. He denied weakness, stiffness, or limitations of activities of daily living. The PE was detailed and revealed a normal gait with non-painful limited ROM. The drawer test was positive without end-point description; all other stability tests were negative. The CI’s diagnosis was stated per historical radiology reports of ACL tear with an additional comment of “residual instability present.”

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM
 (Degrees)
NARSUM 3.7 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20031114)
VA C&P 2.7 Mo. Post-Sep
(20040525)
Flexion (140 Normal)
 105 112
Extension (0 Normal)
 0 - 12
Comment
 (+) laxity (+) laxity
§4.71a Rating
 10%-20% (PEB 20%) 20% (VA 10%)

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the service and VA titled the unfitting back condition slightly different they both utilized (in various combinations) the code of 5257 (knee; other impairment); singularly by the PEB and dual coded with 5261 (limited extension) by the VA. Board members first agreed that the central core of this case were the persistent findings of knee laxity coupled with corresponding X-ray evidence of a complete ACL tear. Members deliberated on the level of laxity impairment. Code 5257 criterion is categorized into three levels of “slight” (10%), “moderate” (20%), and “severe” (30%) impairment. Board members considered and agreed that in light of the NARSUM’s description of “slight laxity” coupled with the VA’s finding of a normal gait without ADL limitations, the CI’s condition is best supported at the “slight” (10%) level of instability. The Board also discussed and agreed that additional limitation of motion in knee extension meets the compensable 10% level under 5261. Absent greater instability, boney pathology, or worsening evidence of limited ROM, the Board agreed that there were no available alternative joint or analogous coding options which are applicable and or advantageous to the CI’s current 20% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that although there are alternate coding pathways available, none would result in a higher rating currently applied by the PEB; and therefore, does recommend a change in the PEB’s adjudication for the right knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating the right knee was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy. In the matter of the right knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140310, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150006267 (PD201401713)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00135

    Original file (PD-2014-00135.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain/Instability Left Knee5099-500310%Left Knee Multi-Ligament Injury5010-525710%20070331Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 (Not in Scope)20070331 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00737

    Original file (PD2011-00737.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67U20/CH-47 Helicopter Repairman) medically separated for a right knee condition. Right Knee Condition . In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual coding disability rating for a combined rating of 30%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01692

    Original file (PD-2014-01692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “traumatic osteoarthritis left knee, with OCD lesions, lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau, s/p ACL reconstruction and microfracture of left femoral condyle”as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%,with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

    Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00717

    Original file (PD-2014-00717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends no disability rating for the knee condition for painful motion.The Board considered rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00024

    Original file (PD-2014-00024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition . The Board agreed the left knee condition had someforward laxity but no lateral instability/subluxation after surgery, given the normal gaits, and findings on examinations proximate to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02134

    Original file (PD-2014-02134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . (Normal: 140 and 0 degrees).On an orthopedic exam on 7 May 2001, surgical incisions were well healed and the knee had no lateral instability (varus/valgus) but mild “laxity” at the ACL repair site (1A Lachman test).At the MEB/NARSUM evaluationon 25 June 2001, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported a continued inability to walk or run without knee pain. Mild anterior laxity was again noted (1A Lachman test).ROM results are in the chart below.On the DD Form 2808...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00097

    Original file (PD-2014-00097.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee ROM (Degrees)Ortho Addendum 4 Mo. In keeping with the subjective instability the CI experienced and the “mild instability” documented by the orthopedic specialist, Board members agree that the CI’s right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01594

    Original file (PD2012 01594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: CASE: PD1201594BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20130418 Physical Disability Board of Review SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010178 (PD201201594)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00834

    Original file (PD-2014-00834.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “left ACL tear,”as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39andVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent...