Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01101
Original file (PD-2014-01101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01101
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150204
SEPARATION DATE: 20070113


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-6 (Automated Logistical) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “herniated lumbar disc,” “facet joint arthritis” and “back pain, degenerative spondylosis” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (hallux valgus and pes planus deformities and major depressive disorder) for PEB adjudication as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborates no specific contentions. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20061019
 VA* - (~5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5243 10% Herniated Disc at L4-5, w/Lumbar DDD w/Right Lumbar Radiculopathy 5237 0% 20070627
Other x 2 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 12
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70730 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. The CI was first seen for LBP in 1998 when she reported a month’s history of pain following the wear of combat gear without other trauma. She was managed with medications and duty restrictions. She next presented in 2003 reporting an 8-year history of LBP. She was treated with physical therapy (PT) and again was able to return to duty. In 2005, she again reported chronic LBP and was noted to have scoliosis (an abnormal curvature of the spine) on X-ray and treated with both PT and chiropractic therapy without benefit. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 31 January 2005 showed degenerative disc disease and degenerative joint disease of the lumbar spine with a herniated disc at L4-5 which compressed the right L5 nerve root. An MRI of the thoracic spine was remarkable for the previously noted scoliosis. Over the course of the next year, she was treated with continued physical and chiropractic therapy, medications, injections, and duty limitations without resolution of her symptoms. She was then issued an L3 profile and entered into the MEB process.

At the MEB examination on 6 January 2006, the CI reported ongoing pain and the use of a back brace. The MEB physical examiner noted a normal gait and neurological examination without limitation in the range-of-motion (ROM). Extension was painful and the muscles along the spine tender to palpation. Notes in PT on 28 February 2006 and on 15 March 2006 noted normal gait, posture, and ROM. The narrative summary (NARSUM) was dated 20 July 2006, almost 6 months prior to separation. The CI reported LBP since an injury in physical training in 1996 which persisted despite treatment. The neurological examination was normal and there was no muscle atrophy. The gait was not recorded. Spasm was not recorded. Provocative testing for nerve root irritation was negative. The NARSUM referenced normal PT ROMs which are charted below.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed 6 months after separation, the CI reported unlimited walking, but that she was careful lifting heavy objects. Her posture and gait were described as adequate. The ROM was normal and painless, and is charted below. Repetitive motion did not cause additional limitation. There was no spasm. The neurological examination was normal.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 PT ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep
 VA C&P ~ 6 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 90 90
Combined (240) 240 240
Comment Pain not recorded No pain with motion
§4.71a Rating 0% 0%

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the back condition at 10% using the 5243 code (intervertebral disc syndrome). The VA rated the back at 0% using the code 5237 (lumbosacral strain). The VA later increased the rating to 20%, retroactive to separation, based on a C&P examination over 12 months after separation, since the CI had submitted a claim within 12 months of separation. The Board considered the evidence. The ROM values in evidence proximate to separation support a 0% rating. Absent an abnormal gait or contour due to spasm, incapacitation, painful motion, or ankylosis, the Board found no route to a higher rating than the 10% rating adjudicated by the PEB. The Board also noted that the VA subsequently rated the CI for a radiculopathy, but found no evidence that an unfitting radiculopathy was present at separation. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the back condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140214, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009940 (PD201401101)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01871

    Original file (PD-2013-01871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01997

    Original file (PD-2013-01997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Active ROM “was hands to her toes, and up with slight knee flexion; good lateral bending, rotation, and extension without pain.” Neurologic examination was unremarkable. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01154

    Original file (PD-2014-01154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Examination noted normal lumbar spine ROM with pain and normal bilateral hip ROM.An orthopedic evaluation on 27 March 2009, 5 months prior to separation, noted a 16-month history of pelvic pain following pregnancy. At...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01983

    Original file (PD-2013-01983.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain523710%Degenerative Disc Disease 5242-524320%20051123Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 10%RATING: 70% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02418

    Original file (PD-2013-02418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A note in the record on 3 June 2004 noted improvement with mild to moderate LBP, aggravated by activity, with occasional RLE symptoms, with a normal examination except “some discomfort in the lumbar region.” The CI sought a second opinion from physical medicine regarding a MEB and at the evaluation on 14July 2004 the CI reported no relief of symptoms despite PT. The Board agreed that according to current VASRD spine rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation the ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01380

    Original file (PD-2013-01380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic LBP Condition . All exams proximate to separation documented chronic LBP with activity. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01014

    Original file (PD-2014-01014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain”as unfitting, rated 10% citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation....

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01819

    Original file (PD-2014-01819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Reconsideration PEB (Recon PEB) adjudicated the same diagnosis (chronic LBP), but rated 10% disability due to service aggravation; the case was adjudicated with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Physical therapy (PT) evaluation on 19 July 2004 noted no radicular symptoms were present and the examination showed decreased ROM described as “20% limited all directions”, with pain with flexion, and positive testing for sacroiliac pain, with an...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02748

    Original file (PD-2013-02748.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. DoD Physical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01143

    Original file (PD-2014-01143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20070121 Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain, Secondary to Degenerative Disc Disease5299-523710%Intervertebral Disc Syndrome with Degenerative Joint Disease of the Lumbar Spine (Mechanical Back Strain-5237)524340%20090910Nerve Root Irritation, Right Lower Extremity8520Deferred**20090910Nerve Root Irritation, Left Lower Extremity8520Deferred**20090910Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 15 RATING: 10%RATING: 70% *Derived from VA...