Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01089
Original file (PD-2014-01089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01089
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141219
SEPARATION DATE: 20080727


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Unit Supply Specialist) separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded five other conditions (mild anemia, cervical dysplasia, left knee pain, headaches, and overweight) judged to meet retention standards. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain,” rated 20% citing criteria from the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My conditions limit my forward and back flexion substantially and my back condition limit my working and daily life. As well as my headaches. Both my back injury and headaches limit my daily life activities.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.











RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080428
 VA - (1 Mo. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam*
Chronic Low Back Pain DDD, L-Spine 5237 10% 20080603

5242
20%		 Radiculopathy, Lt Lower Extremity Associated w/DDD 8521 10% 20080603
Radiculopathy, Rt Lower Extremity Associated w/DDD 8521 10% 20080603
Headaches Not Unfitting Migraine Headaches 8100 50% 20080603
Other x 5 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 80%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80910 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Condition. The STR indicated an exacerbation of non-radicular LBP in August 2006 while in Basic Combat Training. Historically, the [CI] complained of chronic back pain for “years.” X-rays of the lumbar spine and total body bone scan were normal or unrelated to spine findings. A magnetic resonance image performed on 22 March 2007 noted degenerative arthritis and multi-level disc disease about the lumbosacral spine. In October 2007, despite the CI’s new complaint of radicular pain into both legs, an orthopedic exam found painful but full range-of-motion (ROM) without sensory or motor deficits in the lower extremities. At the MEB narrative summary examination on 4 April 2008; approximately 4 months prior to separation the CI reported constant LBP at a 9/10 pain scale with “some” radiation and shooting pains to both legs. “She has flares of the back pain to increasing severity of 10/10 with activity of any kind. She has problems even with prolonged sitting and any type of repetitive movement tends to increase her pain.” The physical examination revealed a normal gait with lumbar tenderness. Lower extremity sensation and motor activity was intact. There was no muscle spasm or atrophy present. ROM was significantly decreased with painful motion. The diagnosis was chronic LBP. The commander’s statement validated the CI’s inability to adequately perform her MOS required duties due to her physical condition. Her current profile limitations include lifting a maximum weight of 10 pounds.

The VA Rating Decision dated 10 September 2008 revealed normal but painful motion of the thoracolumbar spine with normal sensation and minimally decreased motor at 4 of 5 scale bilateral lower extremities. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

DOS 20080727
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 4 Mo. Pre-Sep
(200080314)
VA C&P ~ 1 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20080603)
Flexion (90 Normal) 33 90
Extension (30) 10 30
R Lat Flexion (30) 25 30
L Lat Flexion (30) 23 30
R Rotation (30) unreadable 30
L Rotation (30) 47 30
Combined (240) - 240
Comment (+) tenderness;
(+) guarding;
(+) abnormal spinal contour
 painful motion
§4.71a Rating 20 % 10 %
invalid font number 31502
The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the PEB and VA applied similar codes of 5242 (degenerative arthritis) and 5237 (lumbosacral strain) respectively, which was appropriate to the presenting pathology. IAW VASRD §4.71a general spine formula, the ROM findings rated by the MEB was 20% and 10% by the VA. There was no evidence of VASRD defined incapacitating episodes to achieve a higher rating under an alternate rating code. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the lumbar spine condition.

The Board additionally considered if the symptomatic right and left lower extremity radiculopathy warranted a separate disability rating; but, members agreed that the requisite link of the neuropathy symptoms with functional impairment was not in evidence. The evidence of normal sensation and 4/5 motor functions to the lower extremities did not reflect a true radicular adverse condition. Additionally, any pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The Board concluded therefore that any radiculopathy condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

Contended PEB Conditions.

Headaches: The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the headache condition was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The headache condition was not profiled or specifically implicated in the commander’s performance statement and was not judged to fail retention standards. The condition was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance-based evidence from the record that the headache condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for a headache condition and so no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended headache condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB’s determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.












RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.






The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140228, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009554 (PD201401089)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01781

    Original file (PD-2013-01781.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02418

    Original file (PD-2013-02418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A note in the record on 3 June 2004 noted improvement with mild to moderate LBP, aggravated by activity, with occasional RLE symptoms, with a normal examination except “some discomfort in the lumbar region.” The CI sought a second opinion from physical medicine regarding a MEB and at the evaluation on 14July 2004 the CI reported no relief of symptoms despite PT. The Board agreed that according to current VASRD spine rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation the ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00598

    Original file (PD-2014-00598.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-operatively, pain improvement was insufficient to allow return to full duties.The neurology MEB addendum examination on 21 June 2007 (6months prior to separation) noted normal lower extremity muscle strength.At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00800

    Original file (PD 2012 00800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. The PEB rated the CI chronic LBP 10% under code 5299-5237 (lumbosacral strain) citing the ROM examination from the 21 July 2003 reported in the MEB NARSUM showing flexion greater than 60 degrees. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Low Back Pain, Secondary to Degenerative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02166

    Original file (PD-2013-02166.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, Due to Lumbar Spondylosis, Without Neurologic Abnormality5299-523710%HNP L5-S1 w/o objective evidence of Residual Lower Extremity...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00213

    Original file (PD-2014-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP523710%Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Syndrome524310%20070227S1 Radiculopathy Left Lower Extremity5243-852010%20070227Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01174

    Original file (PD-2013-01174.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. “The neurologic exam was grossly non-focal.” Three months prior to separation, he was seen for severe pain and noted to have tenderness, muscle spasm, pain with full ROM, and normal contour of the lumbosacral spine. I...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01721

    Original file (PD-2014-01721.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forward LBP with radiation to the right lower extremity condition,characterized as “ low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease” and “ probable SI radicular symptoms” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Board members agreed that sufficient evidence of limitation of motion was present to justify the PEB’s 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.71a. Right Lower Extremity Condition .The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommended under a peripheral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01718

    Original file (PD-2014-01718.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain w/Residual Left Leg Pain5299-529510%Recurrent Central Disc Protrusion, Chronic Low Back Pain, and Intermittent Radiculopathy Status Post L4-5 Microdiscectomy529320%20010709Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20010925 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...