Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01721
Original file (PD-2014-01721.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-01721
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140912
SEPARATION DATE: 20080812


SUMMARY OF CASE: The available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 ( 92Y 10 / Unit Supply Specialist) medically separated for low back pain (LBP) with radiation to the right lower extremity (RLE) . The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forward LBP with radiation to the right lower extremity condition, characterized as “ low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease ” and “ probable SI radicular symptoms ” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the “LBP with radiation to the RLE ” as unfitting, rated at 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back pain with radiation to the RLE condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080602
 VA - (3 Wks. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain …
 w ith Radiation to the Right Lower Extremity 		5299-5243 10% Degenerative Disc Disease Lumbar Spine L3-L5 5243-5237 10% 20080724
Right Lower Extremity Sensory Radiculopathy Associated with Degenerative Disc Disease Lumbar Spine L3-5 8699-8620 0% 20080724
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 6 20080724
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 40%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 81205


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Condition. Absent direct trauma, the CI first reported LBP in early 2006 that persisted throughout the majority of his service career. X-ray images revealed degenerative disc disease of his lumbar spine. He reported sharp LBP, worse with running or increased activities. Initially, he “denied pain radiating to his legs or any tingling or numbness sensation;” however, a single entry from pain management (nearly 5 months prior to separation) summarized a subjective complaint of radiating pain into his right leg. There was no consistent subjective or objective evidence of radiculopathy present on subsequent exams. Surgery was not indicated and conservative treatment of medication, manipulation, physical therapy and [steroids] injections did not provide long-term symptom relief. There were no documentations of incapacitation episodes in evident. There were frequent references in the service treatment records noting the association of his obesity to his back LBP’s symptoms.

During the MEB narrative summary examination dated 30 April 2008, the CI reported pain while running or lifting [weights]. There was no comment about having current associated radicular symptoms and he denied associated weakness. The physical examination revealed low back tenderness without [muscle] spasms. There was no limitation to thoracolumbar range-of-motion (ROM) and his gait was normal.

At the VA Compensation and Pension general medical examination dated 24 July 2008, the CI endorsed a constant back pain whereby, “the pain is present daily” with intermittent symptoms into both hips and thighs. The description of any leg involvement was poorly documented and vague. Specifically, the examiner documented “The pain in the lower back sometimes feels as if it is going towards the right hip and toward the right thigh but no typical radiculitis signs or symptoms” and “presently, the pain in the low back sometimes goes towards the left hip also a little bit, but it stays in the gluteal area.” Additionally, it was noted that “…the radiation down the lower extremities is not very clear if [he] has a dermatome distribution.”

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

DOS 20080812
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 3.5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20080430)
VA C&P ~ 3 Wks. Pre-Sep
(20080724)
Flexion (90 Normal) 90 75
Extension (30) 30 22
R Lat Flexion (30) 30 25
L Lat Flexion (30) 30 22
R Rotation (30) 30 42
L Rotation (30) 30 42
Combined (240) 240 228
Comment - normal gait; normal posture;
§4.71a Rating 0% 10 %

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the PEB and VA titled the unfitting back condition differently, they both utilized (in various combinations) the same 5243 code (intervertebral disc syndrome) and rated the LBP condition at 10%. Board members agreed that sufficient evidence of limitation of motion was present to justify the PEB’s 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.71a. The Board then considered application of §4.40, which allows for a higher rating if evidence of additional functional loss is present. Member’s concluded however that there was no examination in evidence on which to base a conclusion that repetitive motion resulted in any additional disability. The 5003 arthritic code was also considered, but absent incapacitating episodes, the maximum rating would render 10%, providing no additional benefit above the CI’s current PEB rating.

Therefore, Board members agreed that a rating higher than 10% was not justified. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic back pain.

Right Lower Extremity Condition . The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve code, for a residual radiculopathy at separation. Board precedence requires a functional impairment tied to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating to service disability in spine cases. Any pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The subjective sensory component in this case had no functional implications, and no motor weakness was in evidence. Thus there is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with fitness implications) from a residual radiculopathy. The Board cannot support a recommendation for an additional disability rating on this basis.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the RLE radiculopathy condition and IAW VASRD §4.124a, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140417, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150006330 (PD201401721)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01739

    Original file (PD-2013-01739.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the CI’s history of significant back pain with muscle spasm and radiation of pain with mild weakness and decreased sensation of the right lower leg. However, notes in the STRs proximate to separation indicated daily use of a muscle relaxant medication and later evidence in record suggests episodes of muscle spasm continued, consistent with the lumbar spine abnormalities noted on MRI.Board members consensus was that the totality of evidence in record supports the 20%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02418

    Original file (PD-2013-02418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A note in the record on 3 June 2004 noted improvement with mild to moderate LBP, aggravated by activity, with occasional RLE symptoms, with a normal examination except “some discomfort in the lumbar region.” The CI sought a second opinion from physical medicine regarding a MEB and at the evaluation on 14July 2004 the CI reported no relief of symptoms despite PT. The Board agreed that according to current VASRD spine rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation the ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010 00479

    Original file (PD2010 00479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A lot of evidence showed a problem at L4-L5 level, that was included in the MEB findings report and later in VAMC reports, yet that was not considered in the decision of the MEB board. Therefore, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% for the CI’s LBP condition was reasonably justified. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016402 (PD201000479)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00909

    Original file (PD-2014-00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board next considered if there was evidence of a functionally impairing radiculopathy due to the low back condition to provide additional rating. The Board considered the evidence in record supports thatthe CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02450

    Original file (PD-2013-02450.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The MEB physical exam noted decreased sensation in the right lower leg and foot but no motor weakness.The NARSUM examiner reported that the CI “could not flex his trunk greater than 30 degrees without pain,”but did not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01798

    Original file (PD2012 01798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pain was elicited on straight leg raise (SLR) without pain radiation, and no other objective evidence of radiculopathy.During the MEB/NARSUM on 4 August 2002,the evaluation noted normal neuromuscular examination, normal gait (heel toe walk and tandem walk), and no evidence ofradiculopathy.Upon MEB/NARSUM evaluation on 7 November 2002, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic back pain. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01718

    Original file (PD-2014-01718.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain w/Residual Left Leg Pain5299-529510%Recurrent Central Disc Protrusion, Chronic Low Back Pain, and Intermittent Radiculopathy Status Post L4-5 Microdiscectomy529320%20010709Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20010925 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01819

    Original file (PD-2014-01819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Reconsideration PEB (Recon PEB) adjudicated the same diagnosis (chronic LBP), but rated 10% disability due to service aggravation; the case was adjudicated with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Physical therapy (PT) evaluation on 19 July 2004 noted no radicular symptoms were present and the examination showed decreased ROM described as “20% limited all directions”, with pain with flexion, and positive testing for sacroiliac pain, with an...