Upgrade.Vet

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00077

Original file (PD-2014-00077.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD -20 1 4 - 00 077
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 201 5 0108

Separation Date: 20070312

SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty 2LT/O-1 (Student, Infantry Officer Basic Course) medically separated for a back condition. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty . H e was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “ lumbar spondylosis , with L4-5 HNP, L5- S1 anterolisthesis, and lumbago , ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar spondylosis with degenerative disc disease (DDD)” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.

CI CONTENTION : “Before my discharge from the Army, I was having trouble walking, bending, twisting, etc. Regular soldier duties were out of the question for me. This was made very clear to doctors and superiors at the time. Army documentation (not VA or Private) shows that I had a herniation in my disc at the L4-L5 level as well as sciatica that ran down both of my legs and pain in my hips. The 10% rating given to me at the time was an extreme disappointment and injustice considering I was planning on making the military my career. The rating was obviously given hastily and in the best interest of the Army rather than in the best interest of the soldier.

Since my discharge, I have had back surgery, multiple steroid/epidural shots, and continue to various medications. Unfortunately, I have not had success in finding relief from my pain. In fact, my pain has become worse and has traveled to my upper back/spine. I have also had several episodes where my back spasmed to the point where my entire body was misaligned and became completely incapacitated. Employment and family life has been difficult. Employment has been difficult since my back has trouble in any work environment including sedentary environments. My family life is difficult since the burden of my pain does not just weigh heavy on me but my wife and kids. Please consider a change in my original rating to make the right this injustice.”

SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back without neurologic abnormality is addressed below. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR).

invalid font number 31502 RATING COMPARISON invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502

Service IPEB – Dated 20090109	VA –
Condition	Code	Rating	Condition	Code	Rating	Exam
Lumbar Spondylosis with DDD w ithout Neurologic Abnormality	5237	10%	CI did not consent to the release of his VA records
Other x 0
Rating: 10%	Rating: Unknown

invalid font number 31502

ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that his disability disposition was “obviously given hastily and in the best interest of the Army rather than in the best interest of the soldier.” The Board acknowledges the CI’s opinion that a n impropriety contributed to the adjudication of his disability. It is noted for the record , that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such allegations. These issues may be addressed by the BCMR and/or the United States judiciary system. Additionally, no VA records were available in evidence before the Board due to the CI’s lack of consent for their release. The Board acknowledges the lack of relevant VA records could influence the outcome .

Lumbar Spondylosis with DDD Condition . The CI developed low back pain (LBP) after a field training exercise in July 2006. An epidural block performed in April 2006 was ineffective for pain relief . A lumbar spine X -ray showed localized narrowing of the disc space b etween L4-5 with DDD . A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) demonstrated loss of disc height and a disc bulge (L3-5) and slight anterolisthesis ( anterior vertebral slippage) at L5-S1. The n eurosurgeon noted LBP in the midline with numbness and tingling that radiate d to the back of both thighs. The physical exam findings were a mild antalgic gait with normal motor , sens ation and reflexes . Forward flexion was moderately limited due to mild LBP . The n eurosurgeon diagnosed lumbar spondylosis and disc degeneration and opined that surgery was unlikely to benefit the CI. Several prior to separation examinations documented that the CI had significant muscle spasm of the lumbar spine with “flattening” of the lumbar area. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented that the CI had daily pain rated at 5/10 that increased to 8/10 pain and spasm with activity. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings were normal forward flexion w ith a combined range-of-motion of 215 (240 is normal) with marked spasm , flattening and pain. The o rthopedic exam approximately 4 months after separation documented episodes of lower back pain rated at 6/10 that was aggravated by sitting for greater than 30 minutes. During this time , he would also experience pain, numbness and tingling which were localized to the posterior hamstring and lateral calf muscles. The CI tried and failed physical therapy , massage therapy, chiropractic treatment, acupuncture and one epidural injection. The o rthopedic physical exam findings were normal gait ; “full” flexion, extension and rotation ; painful motion, an d normal strength, sensation and reflexes. The CI did not consent to release of VA records , so there is no VA exam for consideration by the Board . A repeat l umbar spine MRI was performed a year after the initial exam and showed mild DDD at L3-4, L4-5 and L5 - S1 with mild spinal stenosis at L4-5. The CI underwent two L5-S1 epidural steroid injections under fluoroscopy in August and September 2007.

Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment.

The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the lumbar spondylosis with DDD as 5237 (lumbosacral strain) and rated it 10%. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease . ” The Board agreed that the CI met the 20% rating criteria of “muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour such as scoliosis, reversed lordosis, or abnormal kyphosis. ” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the l umbar s pondylosis with DDD condition.

BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the l umbar s pondylosis with DDD condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a . There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION	VASRD CODE	RATING
Lumbar Spondylosis with D egenerative D isc D isease	5237	20%
RATING	20%

invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131226 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President

DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150007632 (PD201400077)

1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00826

Original file (PD2013 00826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation. Contended PEB Conditions : The Board noted that no MH condition was referred into the DES. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01762

Original file (PD2012 01762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The PEB adjudicated the “lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD)” as unfitting, rated 20%with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The VA coded the DDD lumbar spine with spondylosis as 5242 with 5243intervertebral disc syndrome rated at 20%.The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01492

Original file (PD-2013-01492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board considered the 10% rating criteria – “localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour.” All exams proximate to separation documented paraspinal tenderness at the mid to lower lumbar regions and the only exam with ROM measurements documented normal thoracolumbar ROM.The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00452

Original file (PD-2014-00452.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

A review of my medical records will show this. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01529

Original file (PD2012 01529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The brain trauma and incontinence conditionswere not identified by the MEB or PEB and thus,they are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.These and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the BCMR. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02617

Original file (PD-2013-02617.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

SEPARATION DATE: 20090327 The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00077

Similar Decisions