Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00186
Original file (PD-2014-00186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD -2014 -00186
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0630
DATE OF PLACEMENT ONTO TDRL: 20040820
DATE OF REMOVAL FROM TDRL: 20060525


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve E-6 (Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for a kidney condition. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards, but he was authorized to perform an alternate physical fitness test (per PROFILE). He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “focal segmental glomerulosclerosis” (FSGS) was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (essential hypertension [ HTN ] and chronic low back discomfort) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated his kidney condition as unfitting, existed prior to mobilization and not aggravated by military service, but rated it at 30% (IAW 10 USC Section 1207(a) because he had over 8 years of active duty service), citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Approximately 2 years later, the IPEB adjudicated the kidney condition as not unfitting, the CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), which adjudicated his condition to be unfitting, rated 0%, citing application of the VASRD. The CI concurred with the FPEB findings and rating and was medically separated.

invalid font number 31502
CI CONTENTION : “Glomerulosclerosis with Nephrotic Syndrome , Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertension”

invalid font number 31502
SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


invalid font number 31502


invalid font number 31502 RATING COMPARISON invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502

Final PEB – 20060503
 VA Rating Decision1 - 20050124
TDRL Placement – 20040820
 Code Rating Condition Code

VA Rating
Condition
 TDRL
Placement		 TDRL Removal
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis 7502 30% 0% Glomerulosclerosis with Nephrotic Syndrome, Hypercholesterolemia and HTN 7599-7507 60%*
HTN Not Unfitting
Hypercholesterolemia Not in Scope
Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 1
RATING: 30% → 0%
 RATING: 0%
invalid font number 31502 VA rating decision ( invalid font number 31502 VARD invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 20050124 initially rated at 30% from19951230 to 20030126, then decreased the rating to 0% effective 20040820. VARD Decision Review Officer 20060124 ack invalid font number 31502 nowle invalid font number 31502 dged a clear and unmistakable error in rating and invalid font number 31502 increased the rating to 60% effective 20040820. invalid font number 31502


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Condition . The CI underwent a renal biopsy on 2 February 1996 which demonstrated FSGS (a pathologic kidney finding associated with high protein in the urine, low blood albumin, hyperlipidemia, increased risk of infection, and peripheral edema) . He was placed on immunosuppressive therapy. The Nephrologist opined that the duration of the immunosuppressive therapy was indeterminate at that time , but would be at least another year . At a n ephrolog y evaluation dated 10 A ugust 1998 the examiner noted that the CI was being followed for nephrotic syndrome, hypertension , and immunosuppression as a result of FSGS . The CI resumed active duty status on 27 January 2003. At an acute medical care visit on 12 February 2003 the CI ’s blood pressure was documented as 138/103, 144/110 , and 162/111. Another antihypertensive medication (Adalat) was added . At a fitness test physical evaluation dated 9 December 2003 the examiner noted a history of kidney disorder that was in remission and hypertension. The blood pressure at this examination was 125/92. The initial MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam ination approximately 5 months prior to TDRL placement documented that January 2003 abnormal kidney function lab results ( creatinine of 1.7 [ normal is 0.0-1.3 ] ) , a 24 hour urine sample in the non-nephrotic range , and a blood pressure of 122/72 . On 7 April 2004 repeat kidney function labs remained abnormal (blood urea nitrogen [ BUN ] 25 [ normal 6 to 20 ] and creatinine was 1.8 [normal is 0.0-1.3]) demonstrative of stable, but definite decrease in kidney function. The CI reported bilateral ankle swelling and frequent urination of one time per hour. The initial VA Compensation and Pension exam ination approximately 2 months after TDRL placement noted a creatinine of 1.6. VA labs performed on 2 November 2004 demonstrated a creatinine of 1.9 and a 24 hour urine creatinine of 2555.0 (range 500-2000). The Urologist noted that the creatinine was stable at 1.8 to 1.9 , but still indicative of decreased kidney function. A renal ultrasound demonstrated irregularity and thickening of the urinary bladder. Cr eatinine monitoring performed on 24 October2005 was 1.5 , in December 2005 was 1.8 , and t he second MEB NARSUM exam ination approximately 3 months prior to TDRL removal documented a creatinine at 1.6 indicative of stable decreased kidney function with out further decrement in kidney function.

The Board direct ed attention to its TDRL placement rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the FSGS condition as unfitting and rated at 30% ; a lbumin constant or recurring with hyaline and granular casts or red blood cells; or, transient or slight edema or hypertension; coded 7502 (Nephritis, chronic). The VA coded the Glomerulosclerosis with Nephrotic Syndrome, Hypercholesterolemia, and HTN as 7599-7507 (analogous to Nephrosclerosis, arteriolar). A VARD noted an initial disability rating of 30% from 30 December 1995 which was subsequently decreased to 0% effective on 20 August 2004. A VARD Decision Review Officer dated 4 December 2006 acknowledged a clear and unmistakable error in rating and increased the rating to 60% effective on 20 August 2004. The Board considered whether the evidence supported a higher than 30% rating at the time of TDRL placement . There was well documented evidence of kidney disease and a definite decrease in kidney function (creatinine of 1.7 in January 2003 and a worsening with a creatinine of at the MEB exam of 1.8 and a BUN of 25 ) . The CI remained under the care of a n ephrologist and was given a permanent P3L2E2 profile for focal glomerulonephritis with diffuse joint pain. The commander’s statement documented that the CI had been diagnosed with a kidney disorder and both his medication and condition prohibited him from performing his MOS. The Board agreed that the CI’s abnormal creatinine values of 1.7 and 1.8 respectively which demonstrated kidney dysfunction, more closely aligned with the 60% rating of definite d ecrease in kidney function. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a change in the PEB adjudication for placement into TDRL at 60% for the FSGS co ndition coded 7502 IAW§4.115a.

The Board direct ed attention to its recommendation for permanent rating based on the above evidence. The FPEB coded the FSGS as 7502 and rated at 0%. There was clear evidence that although the CI’s creatinine was stable at 1.5 to 1.6, this was abnormal as the normal creatinine ranges from 0.6 to 1.3. This stable creatinine of 1.5-1.6 should in no way be considered normal, but rather succinctly implies a chronic decreased kidney function. The CI continued to be followed by a Nephrologist who closely monitored the creatinine and his other kidney function tests with spot urinalyses for protein and creatinine. The B oard agreed that the CI’s creatinine was still abnormal and clear and distinct evidence of chronic decreased kidney function. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a permanent disability rating of 60% for the FSGS co ndition coded 7502 IAW§4.115a.

Hypertension Condition : The h ypertension condition was discussed above, as part of the FSGS .

invalid font number 31502
BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the FSGS condition, the Board unanimously recommends an increase in the TDRL placement rating of 6 0% coded 7502 ; and the Board unanimously recommends a permanent rating at removal from TDRL of 6 0% coded 7502 IAW §4. 115a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified to reflect a disability rating of invalid font number 31502 6 invalid font number 31502 0% for the prescribed period of temporary retirement (IAW §4.129), and then a permanent combined invalid font number 31502 6 invalid font number 31502 0% disability retirement effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: invalid font number 31502

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
TDRL PERMANENT
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis 750 2 6 0% 6 0%
COMBINED
 6 0% 6 0%
invalid font number 31502

invalid font number 31502
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131230 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review




invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150015582 (PD201400186)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to constructively place the individual on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at
60% rather than 30% disability rating for the period 20 August 2004 to 25 May 2006 and then following this period recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 60%.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of temporary disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the day following the TDRL period.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, provide 60% retired pay for the constructive temporary disability retired period effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation and then payment of permanent disability retired pay at 60% effective the day following the constructive six month TDRL period.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.



3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA




Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00158

    Original file (PD2013 00158.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was psychiatrically hospitalized for a 2-week period following this suicide attempt. Prior to Final Adjudication Date) - Effective 20031003On TDRL - 20031003 CodeRating Condition CodeRatingExam ConditionTDRL Sep.Major Depressive Disorder943430%0%Bipolar Disorder with Depression943230%20040212No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x320040204 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 50% invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The VA evidence and the service treatment record evidence were not available...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01556

    Original file (PD-2013-01556.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to Adjudication Date*) - Effective 19991115On TDRL - 19990820 CodeRating Condition CodeRatingExam ConditionTDRL Sep.Chronic LBP5299-529510%Chronic LBP with Degenerative Disc Disease529220%19991217523710%Narcolepsy810820%0%Narcolepsy with Cataplexy810820%19991217Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x8(Not in Scope) Combined: 30% → 10% Combined: 50% *Reflects VA rating exam proximate to TDRL placement (Final VA rating did not change at time of Separation) Chronic LBP Condition . The Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02163

    Original file (PD-2013-02163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “interstitial nephritis requiring chronic steroid treatment, recent creatinine normal”as unfitting, rated 0%, referencing the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00213

    Original file (PD 2013 00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted the MH condition was rated 100% by the VA. The Board agreed this was not supported by the record, specifically the VA C&P statement of no total occupational and social impairment . The Board agreed that, at the time of separation, the CI had been working and was socially involved and symptoms were controlled with medication, and/ or related to exogenous factors not ratable .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00007

    Original file (PD 2014 00007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Using the criteria in code 7101 yields a 30% rating under code 7533 that states, “…or hypertension at least 10 percent disabling under diagnostic code 7101.”After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 30% for the nephralgia back pain attributed to polycystic kidney disease condition. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01133

    Original file (PD 2013 01133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB recommended placement on TDRL since additional surgery had been recommended for the knee condition indicating the condition was not stabilized for rating.At an interim TDRL evaluation in October 2005, the CI had not been able to obtain the recommended surgeries. Examination during the surgery indicated no ligament laxity or instability and the remainder of the joint was normal as at the time of the 2003 arthroscopic surgery. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01693

    Original file (PD-2014-01693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20060316VA - (3 Mos. Chronic Upper Back Pain Condition . The CI was seen in pain managementprior to deploying for pain medications due to the chronic clavicle and shoulder pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00151

    Original file (PD2009-00151.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the CI unfit for PTSD only and he was medically separated with a disability rating of 10%. That was not very problematic in this case because the VA rating examination after two years was not significantly changed from the MEB and pre-separation VA psychiatric evaluations. There are therefore no additional conditions in this case appropriate for Board recommendation as additionally unfitting for separation rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02446

    Original file (PD-2013-02446.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence,particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. By a majority, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02196

    Original file (PD-2013-02196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. ROM limited by pain Pain with repetition. With a normal gait, non-tender MEB examination (but tender VA examination), normal X-rays, and lack of abnormal wear from weight bearing, the Board found no route to a rating...