Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00173
Original file (PD-2014-00173.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX        CASE: PD-2014 - 00 173
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0311
Separation Date: 20070115


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E- 5 (Health Care Specialist) medically separated for a seizure disorder. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his M ilitary Occupational Specialty . He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The seizure condition, characterized as “seizure disorder,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (migraine headaches) for PEB a djudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “seizure disorder” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The migraine headache condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) which increased the seizure disorder rating to 10%. The CI further appealed to the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), w hich affirmed the FPEB findings, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Issues regarding migraine he adaches were left out of PEB.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


invalid font number 31502


RATING COMPARISON :
Service FPEB – Dated 20061011
 VA* - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Seizure Disorder 8910 10% Petite Mal Seizures 8911 20% 20070323
Fracture of the Nose and Cheek Associated With Petite Mal Seizure 5299-5296 NSC 20070323
Cognitive Disorder Associated with Petite Mal Seizure 9399-9326 NSC 20070521
Migraine Headaches Not Unfitting Migraine Headaches 8100 0%** 20070323
Other x0
 Other x3
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 40%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070607 (most proximate to date of separation)
 * * I ncreased to 50% effective on 20090707 by VARD dated 20100125


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :
Seizure Disorder Condition . The CI had his fi rst seizure on 25 October 2004 with symptoms of right hand twitching first at the fingertips, then progression up the hand arm and then shoulder over a few minutes. He was found face down on the floor unresponsive and jerking all limbs. During the seizure he had bitten his tongue and had multiple cuts and bruises to his nose and forehead. He was post tictal with fatigue and confusion. Th e CI was transported via ambulance to Walter Reed where he was admitted. He had an episode of right arm myoclonic jerking while hospitalized. During the admission , an electroencephalogram (EEG) demonstrated a mild abnormality that was consistent with a seizure disorder . A brain magnetic resonance imaging was normal. The n eurologist noted that a second EEG also showed potential epileptic activity in the fronto-temporal cortex. The CI’s wife reported that he had an episode prior to this appointment that started with three to four shakes of his arm, moved up his shoulder and d own the other side involving his legs ; however , there was no loss of consciousness. The examiner adjusted his medications and opined that the CI could be having simplex or complex partial seizures. The CI underwent video EEG monitoring on 28 November 2005 which was normal. The CI was given a P3 profile for seizure disorder with additional rest rictions noted on the profile.

The MEB narrative summary exam , 9 months prior to separation , documented that the CI had stopped his seizure medications because he felt that his increased headache frequency was due to the seizure medications. He did not want another trial of seizure medication because h e could not tolerate the side effects and felt tha t it negatively impacted his relationship with his family. The physical exam findings were normal. The examiner opined that the chance of a repeat seizure while off medications was higher than would be acceptable in an active duty soldier . The commander’s statement noted that the CI was no longer able to deploy because of the severe limitations of his permanent profile. The CI was seen in the emergency room for an episode the prior evening of 10 -15 minutes of left arm tremors with post tictal symptoms o f fatigue and lightheadedness.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam , approximately 2 months after separation , documented that the CI had a minor seizure disorder described as a “phasing out and no recall of the event followed by a severe headache. ” He reported such an event approximately 4 days prior to this exam and had 24 attacks in total, averaging one each month . He was not on medication for the seizure disorder. The VA Neurologist documented a plan to increase the antiepileptic medication until a maximum dose was reached and then evaluate him. The Neurologist documented that the CI was taking his medication ; however , he was still having seizures.

The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the seizure disorder condition as 8910 and rated at 10%. The VA coded the petite mal seizures (Claimed as Seizure Disorder Secondary to Meningitis) condition as 8911 and rated at 20%. There was consistent documentation that the CI had an initial seizure which manifested itself as starting with arm shaking and progressing up to his shoulders and down the other side of his body. The CI continued to have episodes of staring into space, tremors in his arm and no recall of the event. The VA examiner documented that the CI experienced an event 4 days prior to the C&P exam and the CI further reported 24 such episodes in total averaging one per month. The Board agreed that the CI’s condition exceeded the 10% rating criteria (a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy with a history of seizures ) . The Board agreed that the 24 episodes in total averaging one per month more closely aligned to the 20% rating criteria ( at least 2 minor seizures in the last 6 months ) . The next higher 40% rating level requires averaging at least 5 to 8 minor seizures weekly, which is not supported by the evidence present for Board review. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20 % for the seizure disorder condition IAW §4.124a.

Contended PEB Conditions. The contended condition adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB was migraine headaches . The Board’s first charge with respect to these conditions is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudications. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The migraine headaches condition w as not profiled; nor was this condition implicated in the commander’s statement . The migraine headaches were not judged to fail retention standards. This condition was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no indication from the record that this condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the Migraine Headaches contended condition and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the seizure disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20 %, coded 8911 IAW VASRD §4. 124 a. In the matter of the contended migraine headaches condition , the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Seizure Disorder 8911 2 0%
COMBINED
 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

invalid font number 31502


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131216 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record









XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review




invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150014352 (PD201400173)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




 Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                                                                            Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                       (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03429

    Original file (PD-2014-03429.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The IPEB also determined there was compelling evidence to support a finding that the seizure condition existed prior to service (EPTS) and was not permanently aggravated beyond natural progression by military service. The Board noted the CI experienced another seizure in April 2009, 3 months after separation and the ER physician indicated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00011

    Original file (PD2012-00011.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA chose code 8911 (epilepsy, petit mal) and rated 40% defined as at least 1 major seizure in the last 6 months or 2 in the last year; or averaging at least five to eight minor seizures weekly based on the CI report that the seizures occur without warning and occur approximately once every 6 months. The challenge before the Board was to evaluate the hard subjective evidence and consider the tally of the CI’s major and minor seizure activity in order to apply the appropriate VASRD code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01533

    Original file (PD-2013-01533.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “TBI with residual neck pain and headaches;” “low back pain (LBP);” and “left knee pain with degenerative joint disease (DJD),” as unfitting, rated at 10%, 10%, and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the treatment record that documented any significant interference of the neck pain condition with the performance of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01915

    Original file (PD2012 01915.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He reported headaches for a short time afterwards that subsided after recovering.The CI also reported being placed on medication for seizure prevention but that he never had a seizure and the medication was discontinued 6 months after injury. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01708

    Original file (PD2013 01708.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded seven other conditions for PEB adjudication one of which was a MH condition of adjustment disorder, meeting retention standards. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01556

    Original file (PD-2013-01556.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to Adjudication Date*) - Effective 19991115On TDRL - 19990820 CodeRating Condition CodeRatingExam ConditionTDRL Sep.Chronic LBP5299-529510%Chronic LBP with Degenerative Disc Disease529220%19991217523710%Narcolepsy810820%0%Narcolepsy with Cataplexy810820%19991217Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x8(Not in Scope) Combined: 30% → 10% Combined: 50% *Reflects VA rating exam proximate to TDRL placement (Final VA rating did not change at time of Separation) Chronic LBP Condition . The Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00267

    Original file (PD2013 00267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted no mental health (MH) conditions were referred to the MEB or PEB for adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a determination of unfit for a mental health condition; and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016483 (PD201300267)I have...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00067

    Original file (PD2012 00067.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The earliest documentation in the service treatment records (STR)of a left shoulder problem is a radiology report of the left shoulder dated 7 September 2007 that was normal; the X-ray had been requested for a history of severe pain in the left anterior shoulder after an apparent anterior subluxation on the previous day.Examination by physical therapy in October noted left shoulder abduction limited to 160 degrees and flexion limited to 170 degrees, both by pain. A week later, the CI had...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02593

    Original file (PD-2013-02593.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At the neurology evaluation for the MEB examination dated 2 August 2004, the examiner noted that the video EEG recorded no epileptic activity during her episodes and she was subsequently diagnosed with psuedoseizures. The CI reported that she has had one seizure since...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02110

    Original file (PD2013 02110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His also complained of sleep issues,which were considered to meet retention standards. Surgery was not indicated.The MEB separation examination on 5 May 2009 (6 months prior to separation) noted no back tenderness or muscle spasm. The VA examination meanwhile showed completely normal ROM and no additional limitation after repetition.