Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00072
Original file (PD-2014-00072.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2014-00072
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141002
SEPARATION DATE: 20060407


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard SSG/E-6 (88M/Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic low back pain (LBP). The conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The COPD and LBP conditions, characterized as “COPD and degenerative disk disease (DDD) with central herniation L4-5,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Right meniscal tear and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was also submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The right meniscal tear and PTSD conditions were not adjudicated by the PEB. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting COPD and LBP condition is addressed below. The right meniscal tear and PTSD conditions are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20060228
 VA - (3.5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
COPD 6604 10% COPD 6604 30% 20060821
Chronic LBP 5299-5242 0% DDD Lumbar Spine 5003-5242 10% 20060821
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 8
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 70%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20070625 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

COPD Condition. The first evidence of COPD documented is a pulmonary function test (PFT) result dated 13 months prior to separation. The overall results were consistent with “moderate obstruction.” Three months later, the CI had a chest X-ray (CXR) that revealed probable atelectasis (a partial deflation of an area of the lung) in the left lower lung field. A case management note documented that the CI’s primary care provider started him on an inhaler medication to manage his COPD. Repeat PFTs, 9 months prior to separation, revealed “normal spirometry” with FEV1 of 90% predicted and FEV1/FVC of 86%. Repeat CXR performed 3 months prior to separation was essentially within normal limits. The narrative summary (NARSUM) prepared 6 months prior to separation noted the CI was diagnosed with COPD while serving in Iraq between January and August 2004. The CI noted improvement in his symptoms with the prescribed medications (Singulair and Advair). His lung exam was normal as documented on the DD Form 2808 dated 2 months prior to separation.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 4 months after separation, the CI reported he developed a lung infection in Iraq. He indicated that he was in a high air pollution area and that he would have been exposed to diesel fumes, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, ozone and carbon monoxide. His primary care provider diagnosed COPD as the CI was a long term tobacco abuser and continued to smoke. The physical exam documented decreased breath sounds in the right and left lung fields. The CXR dated 22 August 2006 was essentially normal. Although there were no actual PFT results documented in the C&P exam, the VARD contained the following statement:

“We have assigned a 30 percent evaluation because your VA examination, at the VA Medical Center Lexington, dated August 21, 2006, indicates that your pulmonary function tests revealed a ratio of FEV-1 to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) of 65 percent. An evaluation of 30 percent is assigned whenever there is forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV-1) of 56 to 70 percent of predicted value; or the ratio of FEV-1 to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) of 56 to 70 percent; or diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide by the single breath method (DLCO (SB)) 56 to 65 percent predicted.”

The C&P exam however, did contain the following PFT interpretation: “Pulmonary Function Tests: Obstruction: Gold Stage 1: Mild COPD with no significant response to bronchodilators on this study. No Restriction. Diffusion decreased.” The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria are copied below for the reader’s convenience:

invalid font number 31502 In GOLD COPD, classifications are then used to describe the severity of the obstruction or airflow limitation. The worse a person's airflow limitation is, the lower their FEV invalid font number 31502 1 invalid font number 31502 . As COPD progresses, FEV invalid font number 31502 1 invalid font number 31502 tends to decline. GOLD COPD staging uses four categories of severity for COPD, based on the value of FEV invalid font number 31502 1 invalid font number 31502 :
Stage I Mild COPD FEV1/FVC<0.70 FEV1≥ 80% normal
Stage II Moderate COPD FEV1/FVC<0.70 FEV1 50-79% normal
Stage III Severe COPD FEV1/FVC<0.70 FEV1 30-49% normal
Stage IV Very Severe COPD FEV1/FVC<0.70 FEV1 <30% normal, or <50% normal with chronic respiratory failure present*
invalid font number 31502 * Usually, this means requiring long-term oxygen therapy.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the COPD condition by applying VASRD code 6044 (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and rated it 10% based on the VASRD rating criteria. The VA also applied code 6044 but rated it 30% citing PFT results that were not documented in the evidence for review. The Board noted the conflicting evidence contained in the evidence, specifically the PFT results documented in the VARD (supporting a 30% rating) versus the PFT interpretation documented in the C&P (supporting a 10% rating). The 10% and 30% rating criteria for VASRD code 6044 are copied below for the reader’s convenience:

FEV–1 of 56- to 70-percent predicted, or; FEV–1/FVC of 56 to 70 percent or; DLCO (SB) 56- to 65-percent predicted ………………………. 30%
FEV–1 of 71- to 80-percent predicted, or; FEV–1/FVC of 71 to 80 percent or; DLCO (SB) 66- to 80-percent predicted............................ 10%

The prior to separation PFT evidence did not meet the minimum compensable rating of 10% as the FEV1 was 90% predicted and the FEV1/FVC was 86%. There were no specific after separation PFT values documented in the evidence, only an impression based on the GOLD criteria. The “mild COPD” conclusion, according to the GOLD criteria, corresponds to an FEV1 greater than or equal to 80%. Both the pre-separation PFT results and the post-separation “mild COPD impression” do not meet the 10% rating criteria IAW VASRD code 6044. Board deliberations settled on assigning more probative value to the VARD data which was consistent with the 30% rating as applied by the VA. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 30% for the COPD condition.

Chronic LBP Condition. While deployed in February 2004, the CI stepped in a hole and suffered a low back injury with resulting chronic pain. He was initially treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxers and duty limitations. His pain continued and a magnetic resonance imaging study in May 2004 revealed degenerative disc changes at L4-5 with a “mild posterior bulge.” When his pain did not respond to continued conservative treatment and he developed right sided radicular pain, he was medically evacuated back state-side for treatment. He has plain film X-ray of the lumbar spine that was normal. He was evaluated by a neurosurgeon for his persistent low back pain with right sided radicular symptoms and intermittent right leg numbness. The surgeon recommended continued exercises after the CI decided to defer the surgical procedure option they discussed. Conservative therapy did not result in relief of his symptoms and he was referred into the Disability Evaluation System. There was a physical therapy (PT) evaluation accomplished 8 months prior to separation and the pertinent findings are summarized in the chart below. The NARSUM noted chronic back pain related to DDD with central herniation. The physical exam simply said, “Low back pain with decreased range of motion.” At the C&P exam, the CI reported that he continued to have LBP. He was employed as a police officer and wore a 24-pound belt that exacerbated his back pain but did not change his work assignment. He denied any bowel or bladder complaints and there was no radiculopathy. The pertinent physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

The two goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

T horacolumbar ROM (Degrees)
 PT ~ 8 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 3.5 Mos. Post- Sep
Flexion (90 Normal)
 25 65
Combined (240)
 - 200
Comment
 Pos. painful motion & muscle spasm; Neg. straight leg raise bilat. Normal gait & posture; No Deluca criteria; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation
§4.71a Rating
 40 % 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the chronic LBP condition by applying the analogous VASRD code of 5299-5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) and rated it 0%. The VA also applied an analogous code of 5003-5242 and rated it 10% citing ROM measurements consistent with the 10% rating IAW the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. The Board considered the evidence present for review and all evaluations of the CI’s low back condition at least warranted a 10% evaluation. The 8-month pre-separation PT evaluation contained ROM measurements consistent with a 40% rating. It was also accomplished on a day when the CI had muscle spasms present which would temporarily decrease his ROM. The C&P exam performed 3 months after separation documented ROM values consistent with a 10% evaluation. It also documented resolution of the CI’s radicular symptoms and that he was able to work as a police officer without a change in assignment due to his back pain. Board members agree that the C&P exam was the more probative evaluation and more accurately reflected the CI’s level of disability at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the low back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the COPD condition, the Board majority recommends a disability rating of 30%, coded 6604 IAW VASRD §4.97. The single voter of dissent elected not to submit a minority opinion. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 6604 30%
Chronic Low Back Pain 5242 10%
COMBINED
 40%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131227, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150006495 (PD201400072)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 40% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 40% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.


3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01908

    Original file (PD-2013-01908.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20040617 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00491

    Original file (PD2011-00491.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI developed symptoms of shortness of breath associated with an acute upper respiratory illness (URI) in March 2004. The PEB and the VA used the same coding, but arrived at different ratings for the condition. In the matter of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease condition, the Board unanimously recommends a permanent service disability rating of 10%, coded 6604 IAW VASRD§4.97.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01534

    Original file (PD-2013-01534.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Restrictive Lung Disease Condition . The CI was diagnosed with restrictive lung disease of unclear etiology and the pulmonary specialist also noted possible chronic obstructive lung disease associated with smoking.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01360

    Original file (PD-2013-01360.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB examination of the lungs and heart was normal.The permanent profile listed “obstructive lung disease.”The commander’s statement indicated that the CI’s required use of a CPAP device for his “obstructive lung disease” and his “numerous health problems” made him unfit for duty.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) respiratory examination,4 months after separation, the CI reported his OSA. The CI was not diagnosed with a specific obstructive or restrictive lung disease by the PEBand...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01964

    Original file (PD-2013-01964.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. He requires close medical follow-up, and consideration should be given to TDRL status.”On 4 January 2004, the CI was placed on the TDRL with a rating of 60%. The CI’s asthma was not severe enough to justify a higher...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01773

    Original file (PD-2014-01773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Sep (200 70104 ) FEV-1 (% of Predicted) 94 % pre-drug, 94 % post-drug 73.5 % FEV-1/FVC 76 % pre-drug, 76 % post-drug 65.5 % Medications intermittent use of inhaled bronchodilator in termittent use of inhaled bronchodilator§ 4.97 Rating 1 0% 30%The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the evidence above. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, resides in evaluating the fairness of PEB fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02803

    Original file (PD-2013-02803.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02350

    Original file (PD-2013-02350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was prescribed a combined steroid (Advair) and BD inhaler twice daily and follow-up PFT in three months was recommended.A follow up PC visit 29 March 2004 noted that the CI had no symptoms and was not using the BD inhaler “at all.”At the MEB exam 29 March 2004, the CI reported asthma, denied any SOB or chest tightness, but still had occasional coughing spells.The medications list included Advair twice daily “started today.” The MEB physical exam noted a normal lung exam. However, a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01802

    Original file (PD2012 01802.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated asthma and chronic LBPconditionsas unfitting, rated10% and 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and AR 635-50 respectively.The remaining conditions (OSA, benign prostatic hypertrophy, patellofemoral syndrome (PFS), posttraumatic stress disorder(PTSD) and congestive heart failure) were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separatedwith a 10% combined disability rating. The PEB designated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01210

    Original file (PD2012 01210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated asthma with VCDand chronic pain left knee conditions as unfitting, rated 30% and 0% respectively,referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. 660230%10%Asthma with Vocal Cord Dysfunction660230%20020606Chronic Pain, Left Knee In addition, the CI had a VCD that significantly responded to the beta-agonist inhalational medication, Albuterol for which the medication profile in evidence reflects dosing...