Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00048
Original file (PD-2014-00048.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00048
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141202
SEPARATION DATE: 20061213


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Army SSG/E-6 (L9K30/Armor Crewman) medically separated for a lumbar condition. The lumbar condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The lumbar condition, characterized as “low back pain (LBP) with degenerative disk disease (DDD) after two procedures for L5-S1 herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP),” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded “residual pain and stiffness following left Achilles’s tendon repair” and “hypertension,” conditions as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated “low back pain with traumatic onset” as unfitting, rated at 10% with probable application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting lumbar condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070611
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
LBP With Traumatic Onset 5243 10% DDD, Lumbar Spine 5243 10% 20070227
Not Unfitting No VA Entry
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70517 (most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain Condition. The CI was first seen for LBP in 1997, almost 9 years prior to separation, and treated conservatively over the ensuing years. On 23 November 2005, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multi-level DDD with an L5-S1 HNP which impinged on the nerve root. The CI subsequently underwent a discectomy (surgical removal of the disc) on 15 February 2006. His symptoms persisted though and a repeat MRI showed congenital narrowing of the spinal canal in the lumbar region, scar tissue surrounding the right S1 nerve root, and a recurrent HNP. He underwent a second operation on 27 July 2006. Despite rehabilitation, he continued to have LBP and was entered into the MEB process. The initial narrative summary (NARSUM) was dictated on 10 July 2006, 2 weeks before the surgical revision. It was updated by an orthopedic surgeon on 19 October 2006, less than 3 months after the second operation and 2 months prior to separation. The CI reported continued pain. On examination, the CI walked, sat and stood well, muscle spasms were absent. The neurological examination was normal other than hypersensitivity (to touch) above the right foot. Heel and toe walk were normal. The lumbar curvature was normal. The range-of-motion (ROM) is captured in below chart.

At the general VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed on 17 February 2007 (performed 2 months after separation), the CI reported that he rarely wore tie shoes or socks due to the difficulty bending his back. His posture and gait were normal as was the neurological examination. He was then seen specifically for the spine 2 weeks later. He denied both incontinence and incapacitation, but reported periodic numbness bilaterally in the distribution of the sciatic nerve. On examination, the gait and posture were normal; spasm, tenderness, and weakness were absent. The neurological examination was normal. The ROM captured in below chart. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~2 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 2 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 55 60
Combined (240) 180 180
Comment DeLuca negative
§4.71a Rating 20% 20%

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both rated the back condition at 10% using the 5243 code for intervertebral disc syndrome. The Board noted that the ROM supports a rating of 20% on both the PEB and the VA C&P examinations. The Board found no route to a higher rating using any other available code. The Board also noted the subjective sensory changes reported by the CI, but that the neurological examination was normal on both C&P examinations, which were more remote from surgery, and essentially normal on the NARSUM addendum. The Board determined that there was not an unfitting neuropathy present at separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the back condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain With Traumatic Onset 5243 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131217, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007629 (PD201400048)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                  Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                  (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02592

    Original file (PD-2014-02592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Multiple entries in the STR document normal gait, normal lower extremity neurologic findings, grossly normal or modestly impaired range-of-motion (ROM); and, there was no documentation of incapacitation.The narrative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01856

    Original file (PD-2013-01856.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The condition was characterized by the MEB as “chronic low back pain with lumbar degenerative disc disease” and it was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain”…with “no neurological deficits “as unfitting, rated 10%citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining condition was determined to be “medically acceptable.” The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Contended Pain and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01435

    Original file (PD2012 01435.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No physical examination findings were documented. Although the DA 199 mentioned characteristic pain on motion, which supports a 10% disability rating using either the 2003 or the current VASRD, the PEB assigned a 0% rating.The VA determined that neither the back pain nor the left leg radiculopathy was service-connected or service aggravated. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02147

    Original file (PD-2014-02147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The range-of-motion (ROM) and neurological examination were normal. The radiculopathy condition was reviewed and considered by the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01332

    Original file (PD-2013-01332.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20040820 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The ROM in evidence on the VA examination and the initial MEB measurements support a 20% rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00200

    Original file (PD 2013 00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examination noted bilateral lumbar muscle tenderness and limited range-of-motion (ROM) and reported a diagnosis of “acute lumbosacral strain/sprain with (+) [right] SLR test.” The permanent (L3) profile listed the diagnosis as back pain, but also with herniated disc (HNP) with radiculopathy, and severely restricted the CI from activities. The VA C&P examination, a month after separation, noted a positive straight leg raise test in the right leg (indicative of radiculopathy),(4/5)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00151

    Original file (PD-2012-00151.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00032

    Original file (PD2012-00032.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lower Back Condition . The Board considered whether the PEB removal of an unfitting sciatica was deliberate and if additional permanent rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve code, as conferred by the FPEB for TDRL entry, for the sciatic radiculopathy at separation. The Board concluded therefore that the left sciatic radiculopathy condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...