Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00001
Original file (PD-2014-00001.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00001
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141218
SEPARATION DATE: 20050626


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Infantryman) medically separated for a right knee condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition, characterized as “right knee prominent tibial tubercle ossicle” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic right knee pain following traumatic injury to a prominent anterior tibial tubercle” rated 0% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Over the past few years the conditions have become worse. From driving, to shopping for groceries, and even putting dishes away. I can be walking in the store and my back or knee will give out for no reason. I have severe pain in my conditions daily with the most simplest task. At the same time I’ve had to give up my dream of opening and running a restaurant because I can barely handle cooking for myself or family.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050411
 VA - (3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Knee Pain Following Traumatic Injury to a Prominent Anterior Tibial Tubercle 5099-5003 0% Patellofemoral Syndrome, Right Knee with Scar 5299-5262 10% 20050921
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 51220 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee Condition. The MEB examiner recorded the CI’s history of chronic right knee pain associated with a reported fall he sustained in September 2001 while active duty. The CI noted he was unable to ambulate due to the pain in the anterior portion of his right knee. Radiographs were negative for fractures; however, there were findings consistent with a prominent tibial tubercle and Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD). He experienced a brief period of disability, but continued to participate in his active duties, albeit with increasing pain. The injury was initially treated with physical therapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication without improvement. In 2002 he underwent surgery of the right knee to remove excess bone (symptomatic OSD- tibial tubercle ossicle excision), without complication. He continued to report pain. Seven months later, a magnetic resonance imaging was obtained documenting inflammation. Radiographs of the right knee in July 2004 demonstrated persistence of tibial tubercle soft tissue swelling consistent with distal patellar tendinosis. The CI continued to report pain and having failed conservative treatment he was provided a permanent profile and referred to the MEB. There was no report of knee locking, give way, instability, or effusions.

At the MEB narrative summary evaluation on 11 March 2005, 3 months prior to separation, the CI stated his pain was worse after surgery than before the surgery. He was unable to perform his duties and could not run. He had pain over his right tibial tubercle with any type of running, prolonged standing or walking. He had pain with normal daily activities such as driving a car or sitting at his desk. Physical examination of the right knee demonstrated painful prominence of the tibial tubercle. Right knee range-of-motion (ROM) recorded flexion of 125 (140) degrees compared to full ROM in the left. Evidence of painful motion was absent. There was no evidence of knee instability, inflammation of the joint, or neurovascular compromise. There was no tenderness to palpation along joint lines. The VA Rating Decision referenced a 21 September 2005 examination that recorded the diagnosis of retropatellar pain syndrome and OSD. That examination found only pain with limited ROM. ROM flexion of the right knee recorded at 130, and gait was normal.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition of chronic right knee pain, 0% analogous to degenerative arthritis code of 5299- 5003 citing no loss of joint motion (ROM). The VA rated the condition at 10% coded analogously to 5262 based on painful limitation of motion. A higher rating of 20% under this code requires evidence of moderate knee or ankle disability secondary to impairment of the tibia and fibula, not supported by the record in evidence. On review of the records the Board noted that even though the flexion was reduced it was not compensable under 5260 and 5261. The Board considered the 5258 code; however, there were no objective evidence of frequent episodes of locking and effusions to support the use of this code. In 2005, the commander reported the CI continued to have pain that worsened after surgery and limited his ability to perform MOS related duties. He was non-deployable and “would never be able to fulfill the requirements of his duty as an infantryman.” In 2003, the commander wanted to retain and retrain the CI.

The Board agreed the evidence supported the application of VASRD §4.40 compensable rating for functional loss (described in the CS). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating knee pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by the Board. In the matter of the right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5003 IAW VASRD § 4.71a, and 4.40. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131202, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150008493 (PD201400001)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00868

    Original file (PD2012 00868.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Pain . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the left knee pain, and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45 and §4.71a; the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00916

    Original file (PD2012 00916.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Bilateral Osgood-Schlatter’s disease, status post tibial tubercle excisions, moderate was forwarded by them MEB as unfitting to the PEB IAW AR 40-501.”Low back pain (LBP), dorsal wrist ganglion, mild and hypothyroidism, moderate conditions, identified in the rating chart below, were also identified and forwarded by the MEB. The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the bilateral knee conditions as unfitting, rated 0%, withlikely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00344

    Original file (PD-2014-00344.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060405 Left Knee Condition . By the time of separation, the CI’s condition had improved such that he had a full ROM, albeit that knee pain persisted in spite of treatment.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01985

    Original file (PD-2013-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20050224VA -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain Secondary To Osgood-Schlatter Disease5099-50030%Osgood-Schlatter Disease, Left Knee5299-526010%STROsgood-Schlatter Disease, Right Knee5299-526010%STROther Conditions in Scope x 0Other x 6 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050526 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD FINDINGS :...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01962

    Original file (PD-2014-01962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Physical examination (PE) of the right knee revealed deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Right Knee ROM (Degrees)MEB ~7 mos.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00076

    Original file (PD2009-00076.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had excessive daytime sleepiness and was diagnosed with OSA requiring CPAP as noted above. Right Knee Condition . The 5 months after separation VA exam, demonstrated ‘tender patella tendon, tender patella rub, prominent tibial tubercle; no instability.’ History on both exams noted increased pain with activity, walking and standing, but did not indicate painful motion, or pain-limited motion of the knee.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01960

    Original file (PD 2014 01960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A left knee X-rayfor chronic left knee pain was normal. VASRD §4.71a specifies for 5003 that “satisfactory evidence of painful motion” constitutes limitations of motion and specifies application of a 10% rating “for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion.” The left knee condition could not be reasonably rated higher than 10% using any exam proximate to separation or any alternate coding schema.While the VA exam is approximately 5 years remote from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01866

    Original file (PD-2013-01866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01866 BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20140806 The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00518

    Original file (PD 2013 00518.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had a long history of chronic right knee pain and arthritis dating from 1992. The PEB coded the DDD right knee condition as 5003 arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) and rated at 10%.The VA coded the right knee s/posteotomy proximal tibial plateau, with DJD condition and rated at 5010 arthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings with 5262tibia and fibula, impairment of and rated at 20%, with moderate knee disability, citing, “ This 20percent is...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00451

    Original file (PD 2014 00451.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050430 The treatment notes documented painful motion of each knee and the NARSUM “Noble compression test” is considered painful motion. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the bilateral...