Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02826
Original file (PD-2013-02826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-02826
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20150116
SEPARATION DATE: 20050601


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty O-3 (Surface Warfare Officer) medically separated for testicular pain (testalgia). This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of the Navy, so he was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The testicular condition, characterized as “unspecified disorder of male genital organs,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “right chronic testalgia” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “The VA has never done a review which didn’t have errors. I have limited mobility and take medications which limit my ability to drive, my employment, and quality of life. The VA has been inconsistent in its evaluations, starting with the initial determination that my injury happened after the Navy performed the surgery to correct the injury. I have requested a formal review board and have been denied for years. I am not unemployable. I have a good job. But I have to continually spend time and money to compensate for the limitations for which I was involuntarily separated medically from the Navy.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – Dated 20050222
 VA* - (3 Wks. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Testalgia 8730 10% S/P Scrotal Exploration… 7599-7525 10% 20050622
Scar, Scrotal Region 7804 10% 20050622
Other x 1
 Other x 4
RATING 10%
 COMBINED RATING: 20%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060221 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)).
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Testicular Condition. Review of the treatment record showed that the CI underwent bilateral orchiopexy (fixation of the testis in the scrotum) in 1997 to prevent recurrence of testicular torsion (twisting of the testis on its blood supply). Post-operatively, the CI experienced chronic right testicular pain. An ilioinguinal nerve block failed to resolve the pain, but medication for neurologically mediated pain was helpful. The narrative summary dated 7 January 2005 (5 months prior to separation) reported that the CI could only perform desk work or mild activities and had been on a physical training waiver since 1997. A physical exam was not performed. The non-medical assessment on 28 January 2005 indicated that the CI lost work almost 2 days every 2 weeks due to “inability to concentrate brought on by spasms and pain.” He could not sit for more than 90 minutes at a time without standing. Medications prevented him from performing overnight watches.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed a month after separation, the CI reported that medications used for the pain caused fatigue as a side effect. He denied any recent time lost from work due to the condition. Examination showed a centrally located, moderately tender scar and fibrotic changes within the scrotal sac region. Tenderness or evidence of pain was not otherwise mentioned and gait was normal. The neurologic exam was normal.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Under VASRD code 8730 (neuralgia of ilioinguinal nerve) the PEB assigned a 10% rating for severe to complete paralysis. The VA’s 10% rating was based on analogous code 7525 (chronic epididymo-orchitis rated as urinary tract infection). Board members agreed that the condition was best represented by chronic pain related to the ilio-inguinal nerve, and the 10% rating (the highest rating allowed under code 8730) was appropriate. The Board could find no other clinically appropriate coding pathways. The Board noted the additional rating by the VA on the basis of the residual surgical scar of the scrotum. By precedent, the Board does not recommend separation rating for scars unless their presence imposes a direct limitation on fitness. The Board agreed that the preponderance of the evidence in this case does not suggest that the scrotal scar was separately unfitting. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right chronic testalgia condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right chronic testalgia condition and IAW VASRD §4.124a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends no re-characterization of the disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131213, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
 Subj:    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION
Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 16 Jun 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual's records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy' s Physical Evaluation Board:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00560

    Original file (PD2009-00560.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and determined unfit for the Testalgia (coded 8730). The prognosis was good, and “with regard to disability rating I would say it would be mild with respect to the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.” The Navy PEB determined that the CI’s PTSD was not unfitting. These other conditions are all judged by the Board to be not unfitting at the time of separation from service, and are not relevant for disability rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01884

    Original file (PD-2013-01884.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the 14 September 2004 post-operative urology follow-up, the CI complained of constant 6-7/10 right groin and testicle pain. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two ratings), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right testicular pain condition (coded 7525). Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00509

    Original file (PD-2014-00509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Chronic Left Scrotal Pain Condition . DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01678

    Original file (PD-2014-01678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left testicular condition was characterized as “severe left testalgia,” and “persistent varicocele,”was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20020128VA *ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Severe Left Testalgia7599-873010%Chronic Testalgia (Specifying Surgical Residuals and Neuritis)7599-752510%*Persistent Varicocele“Related to [Above]”Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 11 (Not in Scope)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00479

    Original file (PD-2012-00479.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the CI’s condition as neuralgia of the ilioinguinal nerve, unfit, rated at 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In this case, the PEB rating is for chronic right groin pain; however, the NARSUM indicated right groin pain that was constant, worse with any activity, and interfered with daily activities. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01859

    Original file (PD2012 01859.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He reported having 4-5 headaches that month, but he was not in pain on that day. After due deliberation and considering all of the evidence, the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the migraine headache condition. Right Foot Pain Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00720

    Original file (PD2012-00720.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the condition, but this did not bear on rating. The Board agreed the evidence supports likely a neuropathic etiology, but also clinically could support the 7525 code and considered evaluating the evidence for a higher rating under this code. 2 PD1200720 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00652

    Original file (PD2012-00652.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a permanent P3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB physical exam demonstrated a surgically absent right testicle and a normal left testicle. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 SUBJECT: Department of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01046

    Original file (PD2012-01046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20030215 NAME: X CASE NUMBER: PD1201046 BOARD DATE: 20130306 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCpl/E-3 (5811/Military Police) medically separated for chronic pain syndrome following two hydrocelectomies (removal of a fluid-filled sack in the scrotum). RATING COMPARISON: Service PEB –...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00965

    Original file (PD2012 00965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) forwarded chronic left testicular pain status post (s/p) left varicocele and left cord stripping procedure; left knee pain; and history of toxoplasmosis of the eyes to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The PEBadjudicatedchronic left testicular pain as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. Other x 620050124 Combined:...