Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02139
Original file (PD-2013-02139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-02139
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140617
SEPARATION DATE: 20050829


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (11B/Infantryman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). His back condition not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic LBP, mild degenerative disc disease (DDD) at L2 and L3, characterized as medically unacceptable, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic LBP as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting LBP is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050628
 VA* - (7 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5243 0% Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbar Spine, L2-L3 5243 0% 20060410
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 20060410
Rated: 0%
 Combined: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60828 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )



ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Chronic Low Back Pain. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI sustained questionable hairline fractures of the back during basic training with back pain exacerbated by active duty in Afghanistan. He began seeking active medical treatment for the back condition in October 2004. A magnetic resonance imaging study obtained in December 2004 revealed mild DDD without nerve impingement. Upon clinical examination on 18 January 2005, spinal range-of-motion (ROM) was full with normal strength and reflexes. At an examination performed on 26 January 2005 the CI had a normal gait, normal spinal muscle strength and reflexes and was able to flex to within 12 inches of the floor with pain. A nerve conduction studies obtained on 11 May 2005 revealed no peripheral neuropathy.

At the MEB/NARSUM exam on 16 May 2005, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported continued back pain with activity and numbness and tingling in both feet. The MEB physical exam noted tenderness over the lower spine on palpation; no motor weakness was present. Straight leg raising produced no pain. No ROM evaluation was performed. The examiner noted the CI to “not have much pain right now possibly secondary to lidocaine patch (pain control technique) and was presently doing office work.”

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 7 months after separation, the CI reported continued dull back pain without radiation to the legs and feet. He noted having seen no physicians and taken no medications for the back condition, since separation from the military. He was independent in his activities of daily living and had lost no time from work as a security guard. On physical examination posture and gait were normal. On examination of the spine, there was no evidence of painful motion, spasm, weakness or tenderness. ROM was 90 degrees flexion (normal). Motor, sensory and reflex examinations were normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both rated the back pain condition 0%, code 5443 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) IAW §4.71a. A higher rating of 10% under this code requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 60 degrees, but not greater than 85 degrees. The Board unanimously agreed that the evidence in record did not support a compensable rating for the back condition under VASRD ROM criteria. The Board considered a rating for pain IAW §4.59 but unanimously agreed the preponderance of evidence in record did not support the back condition to rise to the level of 10% rating. The Board considered a rating under code 5243 (incapacitating episodes/intervertebral disc syndrome). An incapacitating episode is defined as a period of acute signs and symptoms due to intervertebral disc syndrome that requires bed rest prescribed and treated by a physician. The record documents no incapacitation under this definition in the 12-month period prior to the MEB examination. The Board agreed that no rating could be recommended under this code. The Board considered a rating IAW §4.123 (neuritis, peripheral nerve). The Board agreed there was no evidence for ratable peripheral nerve impairment in this case, since no motor weakness was present, nerve conduction studies were negative and sensory symptoms had no functional implication. The Board found no other appropriate codes for consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a and§ 4.31, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131026, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review




 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002609 (PD201302139)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02260

    Original file (PD-2013-02260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The examiner also noted that the CI had a normal gait, no muscle spasm and pain rating was recorded as moderate / intermittentIAW the American Medical Association.The MEB’s history and physical examinationdocumenteddecreased ROM of the lumbar spine with tenderness to palpation and decreased sensation in the right lower extremity.The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings were summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (performed a month post separation),...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00268

    Original file (PD-2014-00268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam LBP524310%Lumbar Spine Disc Herniation’s524320%20070105Other x 2 (Not In Scope)Other x 3 Combined: 10%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070104 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the LBP condition 10% and the VA rated it 20%, both coded 5243(intervertebral disc syndrome). RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02494

    Original file (PD-2013-02494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No apparent VA C&P exam was performed as noted above.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB and the VA rated the back condition 10% coded5243 (disc syndrome) IAW §4.71a.citing forward flexion of the back of 80 degrees.Under this code, a rating of 10% requires forward flexion of the lumbar spine greater than 60 degrees but not greater than 85 degrees. The 40%rating requires flexion of the lumbar spine of 30% or less.The Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02323

    Original file (PD-2013-02323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cervical spine MRI on 20 January 2005 noted lower cervical spine disc herniation with spinal stenosis and general degenerative disc disease.As noted above, a note in the STR indicated “EMG/NCS-no evidence of radiculopathy.”Notes in the STR near the date of separation noted continued neck pain with intact ROM and normal strength and sensation.At the MEB examination on 27 May 2004, (approximately 5 months prior to separation)the CI reported neck pain. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00947

    Original file (PD 2012 00947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200947 SEPARATION DATE: 20040105 BOARD DATE: 20130307 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (52C10/Air Condition Technician), medically separated for “chronic low back pain due to lumbar disc disease, without neurologic abnormality.” Early in 2002 he experienced sudden...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00886

    Original file (PD-2014-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) neurological examination noted that initially the CI had normal lumbar x-rays and was treated with physical therapy. At the VA C&P examinations reviewed, both on the same daya year after separation, the CI’s exam noted muscle spasm and TL ROM of flexion of 40 degrees with pain to 80 degrees and a combined ROM of 225 degreesand normal sensation at the neuro exam, whereas the general exam noted only “pain with motion” with decreased LLE sensation. At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02206

    Original file (PD-2013-02206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also considered rating the back condition using the VASRD formula based on incapacitating episodes due to intervertebral disc syndrome. In the matter of the chronic back pain, without neurologic abnormality condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02365

    Original file (PD-2014-02365.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Radiating Low Back Pain52430%Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine524310%20070414Other x0 (Not in Scope)Other x2 (Not in Scope)20070414 Rating: 0%Rating: 10%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070522(most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board notes the earliest VA evaluation was approximately 2 years after the date of separation. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of post-separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01413

    Original file (PD-2013-01413.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    During an examination at a VA medical center in 1 March 2001 approximately 3 years prior to separation, the CI noted “constant discomfort at the lower back at 3/10 intensity,” increasing to 6/10 with exacerbations and radiating into the left thigh and knee. In the matter of the low back pain with herniated disc condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB rating, but recommends a change to VASRD code 5243, IAW the VASRD rating standards for the...