Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01851
Original file (PD-2013-01851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD -20 13 - 0 1851
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS   BOARD DATE: 2014 1008
Separation Date: 20040531


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E-3 (0311/Rifleman) medically separated for a right knee condition. The right knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right knee condition, characterized as “right knee partial anterior cruciate ligament tear” and “persistent right knee pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. There was no MEB available; however, the Report of Medical Board did not identify any other conditions for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated persistent right knee pain as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “I was diagnosed with PTSD 100% by VA + post meniscus tear repair R Knee w/degeneration no further surgery.”


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right knee condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The requested PTSD was not identified by the PEB and is not within DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040323
 VA - (22 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Persistent Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 10% Right Knee Meniscus Tear 5259 0% 20060309
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 8 20060309
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20051109 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board makes note that some of the CI’s contended conditions are derived from VA evaluations performed well after separation and that his current VA ratings are higher than those reflected in the above rating chart. The Board’s operative instruction, DoDI 6040.44, specifies a 12 - month interval for special consideration to VA findings. This does not mean that the later VA evidence was disregarded, but the Board’s recommendations are directed to the severity and fitness implications of conditions at the time of separation. In this circumstance, therefore, the evidence from the service record is assigned significantly more probative value as a basis for the Board’s recommendations.
 Persistent Right Knee Pain Condition . There were two goniometric range - of - motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM (Degrees) MEB 8 Mo. Pre-Sep VA VARD 21 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (140 Normal) 110 140
Extension (0 Normal) 5 0
Comment Pos. pain limited motion, patellar compression & joint line tenderness; Mild effusion; No atrophy or instability Pos. painful motion; No instability
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10% (VA 0 % )
invalid font number 31502
The CI developed right knee pain after running approximately three miles in April 2002. A right knee X -ray performed for tenderness to palpation (TTP) of the medial collateral ligament and superior aspect of the patella was normal. He continued with right knee medial joint line pain. A right knee magnetic resonance imaging showed a tear of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. The CI was placed on a 30 day LIMDU for the right knee pain. The CI was evaluated by o rthopedics and underwent right knee arthroscopic surgery on 30 January 2003. He was placed on a second LIMDU on 2 December 2002 for 8 months until 13 May 2003. He was seen by p hysical t herapy for a very slow recovery and pain eight to nine out of ten. The o rthopedist noted soreness at baseline with ROM only to 90 degrees limited by pain and diffuse anterior TTP on all testing. The s ports m edicine specialist noted mild anterior swelling and mild TTP of the popliteal area and diagnosed hyperextension strain to the right knee. Although the CI had chronic right knee pain, there were numerous notes which documented noncompliance with PT appointments and a lack of motivation towards his recovery. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 8.5 months prior to separation documented that the CI had chronic right knee pain and pain limited motion. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above. The CI was given the following specific limitations of duty board processing: no physical fitness testing , squatting, kneeling, jumping or crawling, however the CI could swim and bicycle as tolerated. The CI did not appear at the initial scheduled VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam , however the rescheduled C&P exam, approximately 21 months after separation as cited in the VARD o n 11 April 2006 documented no pain limited motion of the right knee. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the p ersistent r ight k nee p ain condition as 5099 analogous to 5003 a rthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) , and rated at 10%. The VA coded the r ight k nee m eniscus t ear condition as 5259 ( c artilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic ) and rated at 0%. All exams performed proximate to separation documented painful motion. The MEB a ddendum examiner specifically documented pain limited flexion. VASRD §4.71a specifies for 5003 that “satisfactory evidence of painful motion” constitutes limitation of motion and specifies application of a 10% rating “for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion” and VASRD §4.59 ( p ainful motion ) provides an alternate justification for a 10% rating. The Board considered coding as 5259; however , the right knee condition could not be reasonably rated higher than 10% using any exam proximate to separation or any alternate rating schema. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the p ersistent r ight k nee p ain condition.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the r ight k nee p ain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI's disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130816 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record



                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 26 Feb 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:

- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN



                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01882

    Original file (PD 2014 01882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right knee condition, characterized by the MEB as “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee,” “lateral meniscus tear” and “left knee neuroma” (Board believes this to be an error and should have been right knee), were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB adjudicated “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with likely application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01224

    Original file (PD-2013-01224.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01978

    Original file (PD-2013-01978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral anterior knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner recommended an NSAID, continued use of a splint, aggressive PT and Hyalgen...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01299

    Original file (PD-2013-01299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain due to Chondromalacia5099-500320%Chondromalacia Patella L Knee526120%20050311Chondromalacia Patella, R Knee526120%20050311Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x020050314 Combined: 20%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050412 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01856

    Original file (PD2012 01856.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is insufficient evidence to support a finding of not unfitting for either knee.Therefore, it is reasonably justified that the CI be found unfit for continued military service in her MOS due to her left and right anterior knee pain with patellar crepitus and patellar apprehension condition. However, there is no evidence of any further examination in the record. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01965

    Original file (PD-2013-01965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting s/p left ACL reconstruction condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Members deliberated if this negatively impacted their ability to render a fair assessment and agreed that the available evidence was sufficiently probative; evidence presumed not accomplished would not materially affect the Board’s final recommendation.The PEB coded the left knee Grade II chondromalacia patellae s/pleft...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00518

    Original file (PD 2013 00518.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had a long history of chronic right knee pain and arthritis dating from 1992. The PEB coded the DDD right knee condition as 5003 arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) and rated at 10%.The VA coded the right knee s/posteotomy proximal tibial plateau, with DJD condition and rated at 5010 arthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings with 5262tibia and fibula, impairment of and rated at 20%, with moderate knee disability, citing, “ This 20percent is...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01635

    Original file (PD 2012 01635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the any of the left knee conditions, so no additional disability ratings can be recommended.The Board next considered the CI’s right knee condition for its rating recommendation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00772

    Original file (PD-2014-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2014-00772BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20141030 Right Knee Pain Condition . The CI underwent right knee arthroscopy in June 2003 at which time a lateral meniscal tear was repaired, but no ACL tear was present.Follow-up right knee X-rays showed mild changes of osteoarthritis.Ongoing pain led to a second arthroscopy in November 2004 that involved operative repair of cartilage lesions; the ACL...