Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01831
Original file (PD-2013-01831.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-01831
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140620
SEPARATION DATE: 20040605


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (55B/Ammunition Specialist) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP), without neurologic abnormality. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The LBP condition, characterized as “medically unacceptable” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals at that time and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “At the time of my discharge I was being treated for all the symptoms of Lupus. 3 months after I was discharged I was diagnosed as having Lupus.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting low back pain condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20031208
 VA - (6 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5237 10% Lumbar Strain 5237 10% 20041228
No Other Item in Scope
 Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50816 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the contention expressed by the CI, that lupus was diagnosed after separation. It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for conditions that are diagnosed after separation from service. The Board’s authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. While other symptoms or conditions may have been present, compensation can only be offered for those conditions that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of separation.

Low Back Pain. The CI injured her back while lifting heavy boxes. Computerized tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine showed a small disc bulge at L4-L5, with no significant central canal or neural foraminal narrowing. She was treated with multiple treatment modalities including physical therapy, medications, chiropractic care and trigger point injections. However, her LBP persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary was dated 21 October 2003. At that time, the CI reported constant LBP, which was “aching-type” in character. The symptoms got worse with prolonged standing/sitting/walking, running, sit-ups, lifting or bending. She denied radicular symptoms and gait was normal. On physical examination (PE) of the back, there was some tenderness to palpation bilaterally. She was able to walk on tip-toes and heels. Straight leg raise was negative. Neurological exam was normal. Range-of-motion (ROM) was assessed and is summarized in the chart below.

The CI was medically separated from service on 5 June 2004. Six and a half months later, she had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. She was fully ambulatory without assistance and in no distress. Posture and gait were normal. PE of the back revealed normal curvature and symmetry of the spine. Thoracolumbar ROM was normal. There was some right-sided muscle spasm when she flexed forward to about 90 degrees. Repeated and resisted motion did not further limit ROM or function. The ROM evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 7½ mos . Pre-Sep
(20031021)
 VA C&P ~ 6 ½ mos . Post-Sep
(20041228)
Flexion (90 Normal) 70 90
Extension (30) 20 Normal
R Lat Flexion (30) 30 Normal
L Lat Flexion (30) 30 Normal
R Rotation (30) 15 Normal
L Rotation (30) 15 Normal
Combined (240) 180 (n/a)
Comment Some tenderness Some m uscle s pasm/ p ain
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 % *
*10% based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss), §4.45 (The joints), and §4.59 (Painful motion)

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB and the VA chose similar coding options for the LBP condition and both assigned a disability rating of 10%. At the October 2003 MEB exam, forward flexion was 70 degrees, and combined thoracolumbar ROM was 180 degrees. IAW VASRD §4.71a, a 10% rating is warranted when thoracolumbar forward flexion is greater than 60 degrees, but not greater than 85 degrees. Also, a 10% rating is warranted when combined thoracolumbar ROM is greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was appropriate. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other codes which could be applied to the LBP condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, since the treatment record did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling spine condition which would justify a rating higher than 10%.

The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. After reviewing all the information in the record, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically significant neuropathy that interfered with performance of military duties. Therefore, the Board concluded that there was no unfitting radiculopathy present at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the LBP condition.

Other Contended Condition. As noted above, the CI contends that lupus was diagnosed after separation from service. This condition was not within the scope of the Board.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131009, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001032 (PD201301831)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00618

    Original file (PD2012 00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The low back condition, characterized as “spondylolisthesis (grade I),” “bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (S1) and “degenerative disc disease L5-S1,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) In accordance with (IAW)AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain with injury”as unfitting rated at0%. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00297

    Original file (PD2012-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20060126 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200297 BOARD DATE: 20121102 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a 1LT/O-2 (00E, Student Officer) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. 2...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01753

    Original file (PD-2013-01753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neck Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01580

    Original file (PD-2013-01580.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Low Back Pain (LBP) . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02120

    Original file (PD-2014-02120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Lumbago”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.AnInformal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic low back pain(LBP) without neurologic abnormality as unfitting, rated 0%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01159

    Original file (PD-2014-01159.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060206VA – (1 week Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain…523710%Discogenic Disease and Spinal Stenosis…524320%20060228Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 3 Combined: 10%Combined: 40% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060321 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that a higher rating should have been granted for the unfitting medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01947

    Original file (PD-2012-01947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the April 2006 MEB exam, forward flexion was 50 degrees. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a disability rating of 20% was appropriate. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00204

    Original file (PD 2013 00204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting SI joint pain is addressed below. Range-of-motion (ROM) of the lower back was measured, and is summarized in the chart below.Examination of the sacral region revealed marked TTP of the SI joints bilaterally. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00405

    Original file (PD-2012-00405.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB adjudicated the chronic LBP condition as unfitting, rated 10% using VASRD code 5241. The rated condition for chronic LBP is the only condition that meets the Board’s purview for review. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE RATING 5241 COMBINED 10% 10% Chronic Low Back Pain UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00849

    Original file (PD2013 00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB found the LBP condition unfitting, and rated it 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals at that time, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating. Low Back Pain (LBP) . Neurological exam showed normal sensation, normal reflexes, and normal motor strength.