Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01787
Original file (PD-2013-01787.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01787
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140626
SEPARATION DATE: 20051024


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (1N1/Imagery Analysis Craftsman) medically separated for Crohns disease. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The Crohns disease condition, characterized as medically unacceptable was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated Crohn’s disease as unfitting rated 10% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be C ategory II conditions . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My Crohn’s is worse than at the time of separation and I frequently miss work due to flare ups, which occur more frequently. Also my knees & carpal tunnel have worsened to the point of the ability to use my hands for short periods of time.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting Crohns disease, condition is addressed below; as well as contended conditions of carpal tunnel and knee pain; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050830
 VA1 - (3 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Crohn’s Disease 7399-7323 10% Crohn’s Disease 7399-7323 10% 200601302
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 8699-8615 Cat II Right Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 8515 0% 200601302
Left Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 8515 NSC 200601302
Patellofemoral Syndrome 5099-5003 Cat II PFS, Right Knee 5299-5257 0% 200601302
PFS, Left Knee 5299-5257 0% 200601302
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 3 (Not in Scope) 200601302
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
1 Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060410 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS))
2. VA C&P exam dated 20060130 most proximate to DOS was not in evidence; therefore, the Board utilized VARD 20060410 which contained the exam’s notes


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected conditions continue to burden him. The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests a higher rating should have been granted on the unfitting medical condition documented at the time of separation. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation.

The Board noted the absence of the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam from the record performed most proximity to the date of separation. The Board further noted that the VARD referenced the results of this exam in the explanation of its rating decision. Members deliberated if the absence of the original VA document would negatively impact their ability to render a fair assessment. The Board unanimously agreed that the evidence referenced in the available VARD was sufficiently probative such that the missing document would not materially affect the Board’s final recommendation.

Crohn’s Disease Condition. The CI was referred to a gastroenterologist on 6 September 2001 for a history of chronic abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. He reported that at age 17, he had been diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after an extensive work up for a one-year history of intermittent rectal bleeding. He was again evaluated with X-ray studies and endoscopy (viewing the bowel with a lit fiber-optic instrument) of the small and large intestine with biopsies of the tissue. He was suspected of having Crohn’s disease, but no definitive diagnosis could be made. The CI reported a partial response to Asacol, a medication used to treat Crohn’s disease. He did have one episode of a partial small bowel obstruction in January 2005, just over 9 months prior to separation. He was issued a P4 profile on 21 May 2005 and noted to be in the MEB process. The narrative summary (NARSUM) was accomplished on 29 July 2005, 3 months prior to separation. The CI did not have a firm diagnosis of Crohn’s disease despite multiple studies and it was also noted that IBS remained a possible diagnosis. However, he did have a family history of Crohn’s disease in one grandmother. On examination, the oral ulcers or skin problems associated with inflammatory bowel disease (such as Crohn’s) were not present. The working diagnosis was Crohn’s disease. The VA C&P exam was performed 3 months after separation on 30 January 2006, but is not in evidence. The VA rater recorded some of this examination on the 10 April 2006 rating decision. The CI reported a loss of 5 days of work over the previous 12 months and that he was allowed to work from home when symptomatic. The abdomen was tender in the right upper quadrant, a chronic problem. There were no extra-gastrointestinal signs of Crohn’s disease present.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both assigned a 10% disability rating for infrequent exacerbations, analogously using the code 7323 (ulcerative colitis). The Board determined that the criteria for the next higher rating, moderately severe with frequent exacerbations, were not met. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the Crohns disease condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The CI also contended for the bilateral knee condition and for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that these conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. Neither condition was specifically profiled at the time of separation nor implicated in the commander’s statement. While the commander did not cite the Crohn’s disease either, he commented on the CI’s condition rather than conditions in his letter. Neither contended condition was judged to fail retention standards and neither was addressed by the MEB or in the NARSUM, other than under past medical history. Both were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that either condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance in the year prior to separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination either contended conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the Crohn’s disease condition and IAW VASRD §4.114, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended bilateral carpal tunnel and patella-femoral syndrome conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131022, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01787.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,







         
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01136

    Original file (PD 2014 01136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Following partial bowel resection, the CI denied symptom of abdominal pain or abnormal bowel movements and service exams documented normal abdominal exams. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX PresidentDoD Physical Disability Board of Review I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00696

    Original file (PD2012 00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB’s 10% rating was based on a combined 7319 code (IBS) and analogous 7323 code (ulcerative colitis).The VA assigned a 60% ratingunder an analogous 7323 code for Crohn’s disease deemed to be “severe; with numerous attacks a year and malnutrition, the health only fair during remissions.” However, the VA additionally assigned 10% for separately rated irritable bowel...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00633

    Original file (PD-2012-00633.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 2003 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed to the current §4.71a rating standards in 2004. IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at the time of separation (i.e. pre‐2004 standards). At an orthopedic evaluation 10 months prior to separation, the CI indicated his pain was exacerbated by flexion and extension.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02664

    Original file (PD-2013-02664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic LBP with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at L5-S1” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). My rating was for Chronic Low back pain with Degenerative disc Disease at L5-S1, what was not included but could be condition for being unfit. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01217

    Original file (PD2012-01217.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    TDRL RATING COMPARISON: Service USAPDA – Dated 20030124 VA – All Effective Date 20050429* Condition Code Rating Exam Condition Enter TDRL (19981117) Crohn’s Disease Code 7326-7319 Enter TDRL 30% Rating Sep (20030219) 10% No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Crohn’s Disease Lumbar Strain w/ DDD 7323 60%** 5010-5242 Not Service Connected x 8 40% 19990707 20050929 20050929 20050929 Combined: 10% Combined: 80% * VA rating based on exam most proximate to date of permanent separation. Crohn’s Disease...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01833

    Original file (PD-2013-01833.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board members’ consensus was that the severity of GI symptoms near the time of permanent separation was more closely in line with “moderate” impairment at 10%.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) the Board recommends no change in the 30% TDRL placement rating, with a disability rating of 10% for the Crohn’s disease condition upon removal from the TDRL, coded 7399-7323 IAW VASRD §4.114. The Board could not find evidence...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02231

    Original file (PD-2013-02231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Crohn’s Disease Condition . The CI did well for the next 11 months noting regular bowel movements with occasional constipation and minimal right lower quadrant tenderness without rebound.The commander’s statement indicated that the CI’s physical condition interfered with his MOS performance in that he could not take a pulmonary function test and he could have difficulty with heavy lifting due to his abdominal surgeries. The VA applied the combination code of 7328 (resection of small...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01893

    Original file (PD-2013-01893.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. * VARD dated 20080710 indicates a rating of 10% for the Crohn’s Disease based on a C&P exam specific to that condition dated 20080505. DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01112

    Original file (PD 2012 01112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “degenerative disc disease, thoracic spine and low back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Back Pain with Degenerative Disc Disease, Thoracic Spine 5299-5295 10% COMBINED 10% The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01484

    Original file (PD2012 01484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The physical examination was normal.The VA rating decision of 12June 1998 assigned a 10% disability rating for the CI’s Crohn’s disease. The gastroenterologist concluded that the CI’s Crohn’s disease was stable and advised to continue his usual medication regimen.The CI was removed from the TDRL and separated with 10% disability for Crohn’s disease (VASRD code 7399-7323).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The Board first considered if a...