Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01750
Original file (PD-2013-01750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01750
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150116
SEPARATION DATE: 20040828


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Food Service Specialist) medically separated for a bilateral foot condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty, but was authorized to perform an alternate physical fitness test (per PROFILE). She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “chronic plantar fasciitis bilaterally,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral plantar fasciitis, rated as moderate” as unfitting, rated 20% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “bilateral plantar fasciitis migraines bronchitis.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20040407
 VA* - (~3 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis 5399-5310 20% Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis 5299-5276 20% 20040511
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 4 (Not In Scope)
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 40%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40908 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis Condition. The CI was seen for bilateral lower leg pain for several years after accession before she was first diagnosed with bilateral plantar fasciitis on 11 March 2003. Over the course of the next year, she was treated with medications, shoe of comfort, duty restrictions, injections, and finally shock wave therapy, all without adequate relief of her pain sufficient to return to full duty. She was issued an L3 profile and referred for an MEB. The commander noted on 24 February 2004 that she could perform her duties in-garrison, but could not deploy. The narrative summary was dated 10 March 2004, 5 months prior to separation. The CI reported ongoing pain since basic training. On examination, she was noted to have severe pain bilaterally at the insertion of the plantar fascia into the heel bone, but other abnormalities of the feet were not present. Her X-rays were negative. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed on 11 May 2004, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported bilateral foot pain since March 2003 after running and marching a lot. This is consistent with the contemporaneous records. She used medications and inserts. Activity was limited with walking no more than a mile or standing greater than 25 minutes. She could not run; however, she could hop on one foot. Her gait was normal. She was tender as described above. A bone scan showed mild, diffuse uptake bilaterally of the knees, ankles, and feet.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both awarded 20%. The PEB coded the condition 5399-5310, analogous to (dysfunction of) muscles of the forefoot and toes, with the VA coding 5299-5276, analogous to flat feet (pes planus). The Board observed that there is no specific code for plantar fasciitis in the VASRD. It considered these codes and other options for the feet. While the CI had bilateral tenderness at the insertion of the plantar fascia, her gait was normal, she was able to walk a mile, and had a normal examination other than pain. The Board found no route to a rating higher than the 20% rating adjudicated by both the PEB and VA for the bilateral condition. The Board noted that each foot was separately unfitting and would warrant a 10% rating; however, this provides no advantage to the CI. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the bilateral plantar fasciitis condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral plantar fasciitis condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a and 4.73, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130919 w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record







                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150009929 (PD201301750)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00694

    Original file (PD2013 00694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had a long history of bilateral foot pain finally diagnosed as chronic bilateral fasciitis in 2001. The NARSUM and the C&P exam contain language that the CI was functional but had pain in both feet only with prolonged activity. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01157

    Original file (PD2012 01157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The IPEB adjudicated bilateral plantar fasciitisas unfitting, rated 10% and 0% (not specified, but probably left and right, respectively) with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The bilateral pes planus condition was determined to be a Category IIcondition (one which contributes to the unfitting condition).The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), which changed the PEB ratingfor the plantar fasciitis...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01817

    Original file (PD-2013-01817.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The rating for the unfitting chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00091

    Original file (PD-2014-00091.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The left foot conditions, characterized as “symptomatic pes planus on the left foot” and “left plantar fasciitis” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Plantar Fasciitis Left Foot w/ Congenital Pes Planus5399-53100%Left Foot Plantar Fasciitis and Pes Planus52760%*20060102Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Combined: 0%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060410(most proximate to date...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01462

    Original file (PD-2013-01462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20041117 The rating for the unfitting bilateral footcondition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.The Board unanimously agreed the calcaneal exostosis condition to be part and parcel of the bilateral foot conditions and will discuss it as well as the foot conditions.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01403

    Original file (PD-2013-01403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bilateral foot condition, characterized as “plantar fasciitis (PF)” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board therefore, only reviewed to see if a higher combined rating was achieved with any applicable VASRD code. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02729

    Original file (PD-2013-02729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral…Plantar Fasciitis5399-531010%Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis5299-527910%20070409Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 2 RATING: 10 %RATING: 20% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01652

    Original file (PD-2013-01652.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “bilateral ankle pain and instability post Brostrom reconstruction” and “chronic foot pain due to plantar fasciitis” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB found the referred left knee condition as not unfitting. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Foot Pain due to Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Left Foot Plantar Fasciitis with Pes Cavus5299-502010%20040205Right Foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02250

    Original file (PD-2014-02250.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Plantar fasciitis bilateral, bilateral knee retropatellar pain syndrome and left iliotibial band were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEBadjudicated bilateral planter fasciitis as unfitting, rated 0%,with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01772

    Original file (PD-2013-01772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD‐2013‐01772 BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY BOARD DATE: 20140624 SEPARATION DATE: 20040525 invalid font number 31506 SUMMARYOFCASE :...