Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01710
Original file (PD-2013-01710.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx       CASE: PD-2013-01710
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150416
SEPARATION DATE: 20040721


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve (temporary tour of active duty) O-2 (Field Artillery) medically separated for a right knee condition. The knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded “degenerative joint disease” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “degenerative arthritis of the right knee” as unfitting, rated 0%. The CI submitted a rebuttal. The US Army Physical Disability Agency reviewed the rebuttal, affirmed the PEB findings, and issued an Administrative Correction to the original PEB proceedings. The CI made no further appeals at that time and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Admin Correction IPEB – Dated 20040220
 VA* – based on Service Treatment Record (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Degenerative Arthritis of Right Knee 5003 0% Degenerative Joint Disease of Right Knee 5260-5003 10% STR
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 7
RATING: 0%
 RATING: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50325 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right knee condition. This CI has had a long history of right knee pain. He had arthroscopic surgery on the right knee in 1988, 1990, and 1991. In May 2003, he aggravated his right knee pain while running. A short time later, he deployed overseas with his unit. While deployed, his right knee continued to give him problems. In July 2003, the CI was medically evacuated from theater and returned to the US. Magnetic resonance imaging showed degenerative joint disease (DJD), but no evidence of acute meniscal or ligamentous injury. Due to the chronic, persistent nature of his right knee pain, MEB was initiated. The full MEB physical examination (PE) was in October 2003. But, a detailed exam of the right knee was performed by orthopedics in July 2003. At that July 2003 exam, there was medial joint line tenderness, and trace effusion present. The knee was stable to anterior, posterior, varus, and valgus stress. Lachman’s test was negative, and McMurray’s sign was equivocal. Range-of-motion (ROM) was 10 degrees to 110 degrees. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) was prepared on 12 November 2003. In the NARSUM, the examiner’s diagnosis was: Right knee medial compartment DJD, with past history of arthroscopic repair (times 3) for torn meniscus.

The CI was medically separated from service on 21 July 2004. A month after separation, on 19 August 2004, he was examined at a VA Medical Center. He did not complain of joint pain at that time, and his gait was normal. On PE, there was no swelling or erythema (redness) of his joints. On 2 September 2004, the CI was seen by orthopedics. The PE of the right knee showed some tenderness and crepitus. Tests for ligamentous laxity were negative. Right knee ROM was 0 degrees to 120 degrees, with pain.

The ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation are summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM
(Degrees)
PT ~ 12 mos. Pre-Sep
(20030724)
 NARSUM ~ 8 mos. Pre-Sep
(20031112)
 Ortho ~ 6 weeks Post-Sep
(200 40902 )
Flexion (140 Normal) 95 60 12 0
Extension (0 Normal) 5 10 0

The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The Board determined that the September 2004 o rthopedic exam was just 6 weeks after the DOS, and therefore carried significant probative value. At that exam, right knee ROM was 0 - 120 degrees, with pain. The knee condition was essentially noncompensable, based solely upon the VASRD §4.71a codes for loss of knee motion. However, a 10% rating is warranted under diagnostic code 5259 (Cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic). There was no path to a higher rating for the right knee since there was insufficient evidence of ligamentous instability, subluxation, or other seriously disabling joint abnormality that would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the unfitting right knee condition. It is appropriately coded 5259, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, meets criter ia for a 10% disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5259, IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.



RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Degenerative arthritis of the right knee 5259 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131008, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , AR20150012517 (PD201301710)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01939

    Original file (PD-2014-01939.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left knee pain . The Board determined that, since the left knee was implicated in the Physical Profile (DA Form 3349), and in the commander’s performance statement dated 10 May 2004, it was appropriate to document the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00891

    Original file (PD2012-00891.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Rating 10%* 10% Exam 20000325 20000325 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20040302 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200891 BOARD DATE: 20130125 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC E-4 (62E/Heavy Construction Equipment Operator), medically separated for right knee injury. There was no MEB ROM evaluation. Meniscal coding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01857

    Original file (PD-2014-01857.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Left Knee Pain Condition . At the VA Compensation and Pension examon 7 March 2005 (8 months after separation) the CI reported chronic pain in the left knee joint with flare-ups from prolonged walking, going up and down stairs or trying to squat. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01992

    Original file (PD-2014-01992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20020515 It was the more proximate to the date of separation and its objective examination was most detailed, accurate, and complete.The Board agreed that the PEB’s 10% rating was supported under the 5003 coding pathway by sufficient evidence of painful motion (§4.59); or alternatively, under the 5259 code due to surgical intervention and the removal of cartilage. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01564

    Original file (PD-2013-01564.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Those measurements are summarized in the chart below.Two months prior to separation from service, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, the examiner noted that the CI was walking with a limp, and using a cane. Right Knee ROM (Degrees)MEB ~ 7 mos. In the matter of the right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a 10% disability rating, coded 5299-5259 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00093

    Original file (PD-2014-00093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01933

    Original file (PD-2013-01933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to DVA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The examination on 5March 2009 (5 years after separation) showed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00104

    Original file (PD-2014-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.In the matter of the left knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5010 IAW VASRD §4.71a.In the matter of the contended hyperlipidemia condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02156

    Original file (PD-2013-02156.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20031020VA*ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals Left Knee Arthroscopy w/ RPPS*10%*Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other VA Ratings: RAD 30%; R Knee 10%; L Wrist 0% Combined: 0%Combined: 50% No VA rating decisions nor the Compensation and Pension (C&P) evaluationswere in evidence. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of post-separation VA findings, particularly within 12 months of separation, although the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01745

    Original file (PD-2014-01745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hyperlipidemia was submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, and “left knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). On PE of the knees, the left knee was normal in appearance. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.