RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1201487 SEPARATION DATE: 20020402
BOARD DATE: 20130307
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (88M20/Motor Transport Operator),
medically separated for left wrist arthritis. The CI injured her left wrist when she fell on her
outstretched arm during Army physical training in August 1999. Initial treatments through
occupational therapy did not resolve her persistent pain. An arthrogram performed in
December 2000 revealed a triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear in her left wrist. She
had an uncomplicated procedure on 9 February 2001 for arthroscopic debridement and repair
of her lesion. Chondromalacia of her distal radius was incidentally discovered in surgery.
Postoperatively, the CI remained with left wrist pain with almost any activities. Her pain
restricts her ability to perform her job and military duties. There was no relief refractory for her
pain except for rest. The CIs left wrist arthritis condition could not be adequately rehabilitated
to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy
physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical
Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board
PEB adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the left wrist arthritis condition as unfitting, rated 0%,
with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and AR 40-
501. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating. The CI is
right hand dominant.
CI CONTENTION: I have lived with chronic pain since 1994 when I was injured in the Army. My
condition has worsened since I was last evaluated by the VA. I suffer from severe degenerative
disease and advanced scoliosis and I am currently under the care of a doctor for pain
management and physical therapy for the third time to help cope with pain. My job
perforemance (sic) is limited and very hard to do because I am always in pain. I am forced to
take pain medication to cope with pain which most of the time restricts me from effectively
performing on the job. I have considered quitting my job because my pain affects me too often
on the job. My rest cycle and sleep is limited daily to approximately 3 hours daily because I can
only lay on the right side of my body. I cannot sleep on my back, stomach, or left side of my
body. My condition is not curable and I also have issues with the discs in my back as well at this
point. I am always in pain and pain medication often times do not even work. My disability has
not only affected me physically but emotionally because I am so limited to what I can do and
have no tolerance for pain at all. My job as a spouse and a mother is limited because I often
need help with household duties as well. sic
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The unfitting left wrist arthritis condition
as requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board
purview; and, is addressed below. The other requested conditions of back degenerative
disease, advanced scoliosis, and sleep limitation are not within the Boards purview. The
remaining conditions rated by the VA at separation and listed on the DA Form 294 are not
within the Boards purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or
otherwise outside the Boards defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration
by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB Dated 20020103
VA All Effective Date 20020403
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Left Wrist Arthritis
5003
0%
Triangular Fibrocartilage
Complex (TFCC) Tear, Left Wrist
5299-5215
0%*
STR
.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries.
0% X 3 / Not Service-Connected x 4
STR
Combined: 0%
Combined: 0%**
*Later, VA changed the VA code and rated triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear, left wrist at 5003 to 10% 20070330.
**Later other conditions were added; combined rating increased to 40% from 20070330.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CIs contention regarding the significant
impairment with which her service-connected condition continues to burden her; but, must
emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to
compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions
resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the
Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board
considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI
6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence.
Post-separation evidence is probative to the Boards recommendations only to the extent that
it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.
Left Wrist Arthritis Condition. The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence
which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of
additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
Left Wrist ROM
(Degrees)
OT ~12 Mos. Pre-Sep
MEB ~8 Mos. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~70 Mos. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (0-70)
30
45
0-45
Palmar Flexion (0-80)
10
45
0-40
Ulnar Deviation (0-45)
20
0-20
Radial Deviation (0-20)
15
0-20
Comment: Surgery 14
Mo. Pre-Sep
Stiffness & pain;
Pain w/ PROM
Painful motion; swollen;
Neurovascularly intact
Painful motion
§4.71a Rating
10%
10%
10%
At the MEB examination (8 months prior to separation and 5 months post-surgery), the CI
reported continued pain and ache in her left wrist with activities. The examination revealed
well healed surgical portal scars on the dorsal aspect of the left wrist and her wrist was grossly
swollen with tenderness to the areas of the TFCC and distal radius. There was good muscle
strength and grip. The exam is summarized above. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P)
examination (70 months post separation), the CI reported left wrist pain specifically worse with
typing and lifting. Additionally, she reported left wrist stiffness and weakness and the need to
wear a wrist support brace. The VA exam revealed painful motion without wrist joint ankylosis.
The exam ROM is summarized above.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
Board acknowledges the C&P exam was very remote (70 months) to the CIs date of separation
and therefore, provides minimal probative value in the rating decision. The Board determined
that the MEB exam had the highest probative value due to its medical completeness and its
proximity to the CIs date of separation. Both the Army and VA rated the CIs left wrist arthritis
condition at 0% using 5003 (arthritis) and analogous code 5299-5215 (wrist, limitation of
motion) respectively. All exams indicated noncompensable ROMs under the appropriate wrist
code of 5215. The Board considered analogous code of 5003-5014 (Osteomalacia) for the
chondromalacia condition contributing to her persistent pain. The initial VARD (VA 0% rating)
noted the CI failed to show for a scheduled VA exam or to submit records of treatment. The
treatment record consistently documented painful motion of the wrist, and the Board
conceded painful motion IAW VASRD §4.59 for a major joint IAW VASRD §4.45. After due
deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of
reasonable doubt) and §4.59 (Painful motion), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10%
for the left wrist arthritis condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy and AR 635-40 for rating left wrist arthritis was operant in
this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the
matter of the left wrist arthritis condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability
rating of 10% coded 5003-5014 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the
Boards scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Left Wrist Arthritis
5003-5014
10%
COMBINED
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120825, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130008729 (PD201201487)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.
Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Boards
recommendation to modify the individuals disability rating to 10% without recharacterization
of the individuals separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected
accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and
to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02055
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “chronic pain, right wrist”as unfitting, rated 10%referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The examiner’s prognosis was “fair” and rated the CI’s pain as “slight” and “frequent.”At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed on 21 July 2004 (3 months after separation), the CI reported constant, but non-incapacitating right wrist pain. ...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01505
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI had documented pain on motion and an increase of symptoms with repetition at the VA C&P examination just prior to separation, a 10% rating using code 5099-5003 is reasonable. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44,...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01163
SEPARATION DATE: 20090203 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the chronic left wrist pain, status-post repair of tear of triangular...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00481
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Chronic Left Wrist Pain Condition . At the VA exam performed on 27 July 2005, 28 months after separation, the CI stated he had not been seen for the condition since he separated from the service, and was not taking medication for it.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00789
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY SEPARATION DATE: 20080128 NAME: CASE NUMBER: PD1200789 BOARD DATE: 20130103 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty DC2/E-5 (Damage Control Man), medically separated for a left distal radius fracture. The conditions right distal radius fracture and left proximal fibular fracture as requested for consideration meet the...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00749
CI CONTENTION: “I had two major surgeries at one time before I was released from active duty that was no included in my med board evaluation. Chronic Right Wrist Pain due to Malunion of Right Wrist Fracture. The CI was noted to be left‐handed.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00592
The PEB adjudicated the chronic right wrist pain/instability and chronic left wrist pain/instability conditions as unfitting, rated 10% for each wrist, with a bilateral factor of 1.9% applied, providing a combined 20% permanent disability rating, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Chronic Left Wrist Pain/Instability. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00025
Right Wrist Condition . The CI was evaluated by multiple orthopedic specialists and after the MEB examination underwent repeat surgery for the OCD on 3 February 2005.A PT note on 15 August 2005 noted the CI reported doing “pretty well,” with improved ability to walk and decreased pain.At the MEB examinationthe CI reported right ankle pain. At a VA outpatient physical medicine evaluation on 9 November 2005, 2 months after separation, the CI reported right ankle pain despite two surgeries...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00263
VA -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)*CodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain [and Surgical Residuals], Both Wrists... The Board’s initial charge in this case was therefore directed at determining if the PEB’s combined adjudication was justified in lieu of separate ratings.To that end, the evidence for the bilateral wrist, bilateral shoulder, and bilateral knee conditions are presented separately; with attendant recommendations regarding separate unfitness, and separate ratings...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01215
The bilateral feet, pubic symphysis, bilateral wrist and left ankle condition, characterized as “bilateral foot bunionectomies with chronic pain,”“pubic symphysis pain,” “bilateral wrist pain,” and “left ankle pain” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Bilateral Feet Following Bunionectomy, Pubic Symphysis, Bilateral Wrists, Left Ankle5099-500310%Residuals of Bunionectomies Both...