Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00617
Original file (PD-2012-00617.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

 

 

  

BRANCH OF SERVICE:   ARMY  
SEPARATION DATE:  20020410 

 
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200617 
BOARD DATE:  20130108    
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty, SPC/E‐4, (19K/Armor Crewman), medically separated 
for chronic low back pain (LBP), due to herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP).  He was treated, but 
did  not  improve  adequately  to  fully  perform  his  military  duties,  or  meet  physical  fitness 
standards.  He was issued a permanent P3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board 
(MEB).  The MEB found his LBP medically unacceptable IAW AR 40‐501, and referred him to a 
Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  No other conditions were listed on the DA Form 3947.  The 
PEB found the LBP condition unfitting and rated it 10%.  The CI accepted the PEB finding, and 
was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.   
 
 
CI  CONTENTION:  “My  conditions  have  all  gotten  much  worse,  my  back  so  bad  I  required 
another  surgery.  My  knees  make  it  impossible  to  sit  for  hours  and  all  this  raises  blood 
pressure.” 
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those 
conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military 
service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be 
unfitting by the PEB.”  The unfitting back pain condition (chronic lower back pain with left lower 
extremity  radicular  pain)  meets  the  criteria  prescribed  in  DoDI  6040.44,  and  is  accordingly 
addressed below.  No other condition is within the Board’s purview.  Any condition outside the 
Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for 
Correction of Military Records.   
 
 
RATING COMPARISON:   
 

VA (7 mos. Post‐Separation) – All Effective 20020411 

 
 
 
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:  The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertion that his conditions have all 
gotten much worse.  It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the same laws for 
Service  disability  entitlements  as  those  under  which  the  Disability  Evaluation  System  (DES) 
operates.  The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for future 
severity  or  potential  complications  of  conditions.    That  role  and  authority  is  granted  to  the 
Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA).    The  Board  evaluates  DVA  evidence  in  arriving  at  its 
recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating 
determinations  at  the  time  of  separation.    While  the  DES  considers  all  of  the  CI's  medical 
conditions,  compensation  can  only  be  offered  for  those  conditions  that  cut  short  a  service 
member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of separation.  

Army PEB – dated 20020201 
Condition 

Rating 
10% 
↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ 

Code 
5293 

Low Back Pain (LBP) 

Combined:  10% 

Condition

Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)

0% x 1 / Not Service‐Connected x 2

Combined:  20%

Code

5293‐5292 

Rating 
20% 

Exam

20021119
20021119

The  DVA,  however,  is  empowered  to  compensate  for  service‐connected  conditions  and  to 
periodically  re‐evaluate  said  conditions  for  the  purpose  of  adjusting  the  Veteran’s  disability 
rating should the degree of impairment change over time. 
   
Low Back Pain (LBP), with Left Lower Extremity Radicular Pain.  In 1999, the CI began having LBP 
and left radicular pain.  He underwent back surgery and was better, but his symptoms gradually 
returned  and  became  progressively  worse.    The  pain  was  hindering  his  ability  to  perform 
normal daily activities.  The CI declined further surgery, and an MEB was initiated.  His MEB 
narrative summary (NARSUM) was dictated in November 2001.  The physical examination (PE) 
was done on 16 August 2001, and is recorded on DD Form 2808.  At that exam, back flexion was 
45  degrees.    Lumbar  paraspinal  muscles  were  tight,  and  some  tenderness  to  palpation  (TTP) 
was noted.  Motor testing showed a slight decrease in strength for the left leg, due to pain.  A 
follow‐up neurological exam was done on 7 January 2002, and it was normal.  As noted above, 
the  CI  was  medically  separated  from  the  Army  on  10  April  2002.    Seven  months  later,  in 
November 2002, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam.  At that exam, he did 
not  appear  to  be  in  obvious  pain,  and  did  not  walk  with  a  limp.    Examination  of  the  back 
revealed  moderate  muscle  spasm.    Back  flexion  was  50  degrees,  with  pain.    No  neurological 
deficit was found. 
 
The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its 
rating  recommendation  based  on  the  above  evidence.    The  2001  VA  Schedule  for  Rating 
Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time 
of  the  CI’s  separation,  were  modified  in  September  2002,  and  then  were  changed  again  in 
September 2003.  The older standards were based on the rater’s opinion regarding degree of 
severity, whereas current standards specify certain rating thresholds, with measured degrees of 
range‐of‐motion (ROM) impairment.  IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must use the VASRD coding 
and rating standards which were in effect at the time of separation.  Based on forward flexion 
of  45‐50  degrees  and  the  other  evidence,  the  Board  unanimously  agreed  that  the  most 
appropriate VASRD code was 5292, and the CI’s condition was best described as “moderate.”  
There was insufficient evidence in the treatment record to support classifying his LBP condition 
as “severe.”  After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 
(reasonable  doubt),  the  Board  unanimously  recommends  a  disability  rating  of  20%  for  the 
chronic low back pain (LBP), with left radicular pain.  It is appropriately coded 5292, and IAW 
VASRD §4.71a, meets criteria for the 20% rating level.  
 
 
BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent  with  the  VASRD  in  effect  at  the  time  of  the  adjudication.    The  Board  did  not 
surmise  from  the  record  or  PEB  ruling  in  this  case  that  any  prerogatives  outside  the  VASRD 
were  exercised.    In  the  matter  of  the  LBP  condition,  the  Board  unanimously  recommends  a 
rating of 20%, coded 5292, IAW §4.71a of the VASRD in effect at the time of separation.   
 
There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.   
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:  The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be 
modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:  
 

UNFITTING CONDITION

VASRD CODE  RATING

 

Chronic Low Back Pain, with Left Lower Extremity Radicular Pain

5292 

COMBINED 

20%
20%

   2                                                           PD1200617 
 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120603, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SFMR‐RB 
 

 
 

 

 

 

           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           President 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

 
 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation  

for XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130000826 (PD201200617) 

1.  I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review 
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  

Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization 

of the individual’s separation.  This decision is final.   

2.  I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 

accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.    

3.  I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the 
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and 

to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

Encl 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXXXX 

     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 

 

 
 
 

   3                                                           PD1200617 
 

 

   4                                                           PD1200617 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01050

    Original file (PD2012 01050.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The DVA, however, is empowered to compensate service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the Veteran’s disability rating should...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00802

    Original file (PD2012-00802.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated chronic LBP as unfitting, rated 20%. The PEB and the VA both rated the back condition 20% using different codes. The Board agreed that the normal gait and posture, mild to moderate reduction in forward flexion, absence of spasm and normal motor, sensory and reflex findings on both exams confirmed the back condition to be mild to moderate.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00979

    Original file (PD 2012 00979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200979 SEPARATION DATE: 20020802 BOARD DATE: 20130222 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (12B20/Combat Engineer), medically separated for mechanical non-radicular mid low back pain (LBP). The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00933

    Original file (PD2012 00933.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Chronic Low Back Pain .The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI sustained a lifting injury in March 2001 causing severe low back pain (LBP). The Board must apply the VASRD rating criteria in effect on the date of the CI’s separation and the Board did...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01827

    Original file (PD2012 01827.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must use the VASRD coding and rating standards which were in effect at the time of the CI’s separation from service. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00199

    Original file (PD2013 00199.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board carefully reviewed all available evidence and directs attention to its rating recommendation.The VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of the CI’s separation, were changed in September 2003. After a thorough review of the evidence in the service treatment record (STR) and based primarily on the November 2002 MEB exam, the Board determined that IAW VASRD §4.71a, the CI’s back condition was best...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01442

    Original file (PD2012 01442.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based primarily on the data from that C&P exam, the Board unanimously agreed that the most appropriate coding option was 5292, and the CI’sLBP condition was best described as “moderate.” There was insufficient evidence in the treatment record to support classifying hisLBP condition as “severe.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20% for the low back pain (LBP) condition....

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01699

    Original file (PD2012 01699.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the MEB exam (also 6 months prior to separation), the CI reported continued constant pain. The Board considered that the MEB exam of decreased pain-limited motion and the PT exam with slight decreased extension and lateral flexion measurements supported application of VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations) for a rating of 10% rather than the 0% evaluation based on the VA exam, which may have been on “a good day” for a condition which is known to vary from day-to-day. Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01457

    Original file (PD2012 01457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI requested a reconsideration of the IPEB findings after which the IPEB found the CI unfit for his low back condition, rated 10%. Subsequent multiple VA physical therapy records ranging to the end of 2002,within the 12-month window specified in DoDI 6040.44 regarding VA evaluations for Board consideration, did not demonstrate any deterioration in the CI’s condition, although the Board noted that the CI continued to have ongoing low back pain that was being treated with non-steroidal...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00430

    Original file (PD2011-00430.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 20% rating requires muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in standing position, and a 40% rating requires severe lumbosacral strain with listing of whole spine to opposite side, positive Goldthwaite’s sign, marked limitation of forward bending in standing position, loss of lateral motion with osteoarthritic changes, or narrowing or irregularity of joint space, or some of the above with abnormal mobility on forced motion. Both the NARSUM and VA...